Top 10 Radware Alteon Alternatives

4.3 out of 5

48 reviews
92% willing to recommend

Top Radware Alteon Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Radware Alteon based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Azure Front Door, and AWS WAF. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Radware Alteon surpasses its competitors by offering advanced load balancing, flexible deployment options, and enhanced security measures that ensure high availability and robust performance for complex application environments.

Radware Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Radware, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

3.7 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

3.7 out of 5

Radware Alteon offers robust application delivery for on-premises environments, excelling in load balancing, user security, and reliability, with a focus on comprehensive support and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway seamlessly integrates with Azure, offering cloud-native scaling and effective traffic management.

Download Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Radware Alteon Report

Pricing

Radware Alteon has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, highlighting a significant cost difference in initial deployment expenses. Azure offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to businesses seeking cost-effective solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Azure Front Door

4.4 out of 5

Azure Front Door

4.4 out of 5

Radware Alteon delivers strong on-premise capabilities, including load balancing and SSL offloading, appealing to users emphasizing application protection. In comparison, Azure Front Door's cloud-native architecture offers scalability and CDN features, catering to those prioritizing cloud-based security and global deployments.

Download Azure Front Door vs. Radware Alteon Report

Pricing

Radware Alteon typically involves higher initial setup costs due to its hardware requirements, whereas Azure Front Door offers a more affordable and flexible cloud-based solution. Users often note Radware's complexity contrasts with the straightforwardness of Azure Front Door's setup.

View comparison

Pricing

AWS WAF

4.0 out of 5

AWS WAF

4.0 out of 5

Radware Alteon offers strong security and application delivery features with comprehensive load balancing and support, suitable for on-premise and hybrid deployments. In comparison, AWS WAF integrates easily with AWS services, providing scalable, cloud-based security and cost-effective pay-as-you-go pricing.

Download AWS WAF vs. Radware Alteon Report

Pricing

Radware Alteon incurs a higher setup cost, focusing on advanced load balancing features, whereas AWS WAF offers a more economical initial setup, appealing to users prioritizing cost efficiency over extensive features.

View comparison

Pricing

F5 Advanced WAF

4.3 out of 5

F5 Advanced WAF

4.3 out of 5

Radware Alteon offers robust security and stability with budget-friendly pricing, attracting buyers seeking efficient load balancing. In comparison, F5 Advanced WAF provides automatic threat detection and premium security, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive traffic management despite higher costs.

Download F5 Advanced WAF vs. Radware Alteon Report

Pricing

Radware Alteon presents a lower initial setup cost, making it more accessible for smaller budgets, whereas F5 Advanced WAF demands a higher upfront investment, offering advanced features that cater to enterprises with more extensive needs.

View comparison

Pricing

Fortinet FortiWeb

3.9 out of 5

Fortinet FortiWeb

3.9 out of 5

Radware Alteon excels in load balancing and SSL offloading, offering robust customization and integration options. In comparison, Fortinet FortiWeb provides a comprehensive WAF with advanced threat prevention and ease of integration but may lag in load balancing capabilities.

Download Fortinet FortiWeb vs. Radware Alteon Report

Pricing

Radware Alteon has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiWeb, which offers more affordable initial pricing. Radware Alteon may entail a steeper investment upfront, while Fortinet FortiWeb provides a cost-effective option for initial deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

4.1 out of 5

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

4.1 out of 5

Radware Alteon offers attractive features like SSL-TLS acceleration and application protection with cost-effective pricing, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager provides comprehensive traffic management and flexibility, ideal for users demanding advanced capabilities despite higher costs.

Download F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs. Radware Alteon Report

Pricing

Radware Alteon has a lower setup cost compared to F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), making it a more cost-effective option for initial deployment. F5 BIG-IP LTM's higher setup cost may reflect its robust feature set.

View comparison

Pricing

NetScaler

4.2 out of 5

NetScaler

4.2 out of 5

Radware Alteon excels with comprehensive application delivery, strong security, and scalability, ideal for SSL offloading and scripting automation. In comparison, NetScaler's flexible deployment and traffic management make it attractive for security-focused users despite its pricing complexity and configuration challenges.

Download NetScaler vs. Radware Alteon Report

Pricing

Radware Alteon offers competitive setup costs with straightforward pricing, while NetScaler's setup cost is higher, reflecting its extensive feature set. Radware Alteon is budget-friendly, contrasting with NetScaler's premium positioning.

View comparison

Pricing

HAProxy

4.1 out of 5

HAProxy

4.1 out of 5

Radware Alteon offers comprehensive application delivery and feature-rich security while being known for its stability. In comparison, HAProxy is valued for cost-effective flexibility and customization. Radware Alteon provides robust investment return whereas HAProxy appeals with its open-source affordability and simplicity.

Download HAProxy vs. Radware Alteon Report

Pricing

Radware Alteon generally involves higher setup costs, offering advanced features, while HAProxy provides a more cost-effective setup, focusing on simplicity and efficiency.

View comparison

Pricing

Radware Alteon generally involves higher setup costs, offering advanced features, while HAProxy provides a more cost-effective setup, focusing on simplicity and efficiency.

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

4.2 out of 5

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

4.2 out of 5

Radware Alteon delivers advanced load-balancing and application protection suitable for scalability and security needs. In comparison, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall emphasizes DDoS protection and accurate security features, appealing to users favoring ease of configuration and minimal maintenance in cloud environments.

Download Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs. Radware Alteon Report

Pricing

Radware Alteon requires a significant setup cost compared to Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option. This price difference may impact the initial investment decision between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Imperva Web Application Firewall

4.3 out of 5

Imperva Web Application Firewall

4.3 out of 5

Radware Alteon excels with robust hardware, load balancing, and security, appealing to those valuing integration and flexible licensing. In comparison, Imperva offers strong application security and advanced threat intelligence, ideal for those prioritizing adaptable deployment and comprehensive protection. Pricing is crucial for both products.

Download Imperva Web Application Firewall vs. Radware Alteon Report

Pricing

Radware Alteon offers a cost-effective setup, while Imperva Web Application Firewall incurs higher initial expenses. Each solution presents distinct financial considerations based on setup costs.

View comparison

Pricing

Radware Alteon offers a cost-effective setup, while Imperva Web Application Firewall incurs higher initial expenses. Each solution presents distinct financial considerations based on setup costs.

Show 13 more products

Related categories

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

CDN