Splunk Enterprise Security Reviews

We are resellers. We provide solutions to our clients.

Splunk is primarily used for developing CM solutions that are based on the Splunk platform for future security operation center development.

We are concentrating on assisting in the development of a security monitor as well as analysis.

If I am not mistaken, it's a standard CM system for identification, security verification, and event monitoring.

In my opinion, it is too expensive for our projects.

It is very competitive for small and medium businesses. Perhaps some should be set aside for developing markets. To begin with, similar to the current market, there may be some special conditions for large transactions.

In the next releases, I would like to see more pricing flexibility. It's a subscription-based service, and they don't sell professional licenses.

In some cases, particularly with large projects, we are not competitive in terms of pricing when compared to IBM QRadar and other solutions; even if we offer the maximum discount available, our prices remain uncompetitive.

We have been selling Splunk for approximately five years.

The scalability is good. It can be added on-demand in increments of one gigabyte or ten gigabytes. It's a per-gigabyte license, and you can add whatever you need at the time.

Our projects are sized per our current IT infrastructure.

Splunk is used by 10 of our customers.

Our team provides technical support.

I have not communicated with technical support.

We no longer resell Checkmarks. 

We were unable to assist in establishing their business on-premises because It could have been too expensive for our clientele.

Installing Splunk is not difficult, but it can be complicated in some cases.

The issue is the integration with the customer's system, as well as the configuration of the rules for correlation, log collecting, and analysis.

It has good documentation and guides, but the main works should be focused on customer needs and customer resources for monitoring.

It can take three months to complete the installation.

We have a team of three certified engineers who will deploy and maintain this solution.

The licensing fees and pricing models could be reduced.

It's a yearly subscription.

They don't sell professionally because it's a subscription service. As a result, it is only a subscription service that is dependent on the customer's IT infrastructure.

We do not sell Compliance Control Limited solutions because our focus is on auditing and independent security assessments. We put an end to our selling program with Checkmarks.

I would recommend this solution to others. Splunk is appropriate for small to medium-sized projects, and it should be calculated for large projects.

It's one of the best CM solutions on the market for monitoring, and correlation, as well as IT monitoring security.

I would rate Splunk an eight out of ten.

My primary use case is for log management. It's mostly deployed on-premises, but it can be cloud-based as well. 

The most valuable features are how stable and easy to use Splunk is. 

This solution could be improved by better pricing in general and by easier installation. 

I have been a partner of Splunk for three years. 

This solution is stable. 

Technical support is customer-friendly. 

The initial installation is not straightforward. It needs two or three days, depending on the size of the company. But it can be done with one senior engineer. 

I implemented through an in-house team. 

Splunk has a subscription and a perpetual license. 

This product could use better pricing. 

I would rate Splunk a nine out of ten. I recommend this product to others who are considering implementing it. 

I use this solution for data visualization.

The most valuable features of the solution are it is straightforward to use and the documentation is good for finding out how to get the data you are looking for.

The solution could improve by making it more business analysis oriented. The way it is now is designed more for developers.

I have been using Splunk for two weeks.

The solution is stable, I have not experienced any bugs or glitches.

The solution is scalable and it is a requirement of my company to have scalable solutions.

I have used previously Qlik Sense and Kibana.

I did the training with Slunk and once I had the training the installation was easy.

I have evaluated Tableau.

My advice to others is not to be intimidated by the solution and to give it a try. It will become easier over time.

I rate Splunk an eight out of ten.

Its integration is most valuable. Its UI is also pretty much easy.

Its setup is a little bit complex for a distributed environment. 

Their support can also be better. If we raise a case with Splunk support and by any chance we missed to respond for more than a week, they usually close the case. Sometimes, it can take us more than a week to reply. In that case What they can do is they can send a followup mail before closing.

I have been using this solution for a year now.

It is very stable haven't encounter any glitches or bugs till now.

It is very much scalable. I am acting as an admin, and we have more than a hundred users of this solution in our company. We use it on a regular basis. We currently don't have any plan to increase its usage.

I would rate them an eight out of ten. Their response speed is okay, but if, by any chance, we miss the response for more than a week, they usually close the case. Sometimes, it can take us more than a week to reply.

This is the only solution that we have been using.

Its setup is pretty much easy for standalone, but for a distributed environment, it is a little bit complex.

I would recommend this solution to others, but it should meet their needs and architecture.

I would rate Splunk a nine out of ten.

They provide excellent predefined user cases.

This helps us in the footprinting of all the incidents.

When we deep dive into the events for the triggers, we have very little information in some instances.

I have used Splunk for two years.

We raised support cases.

Scalability is always a question for this product.

Response from technical support can be improved. There was always a delay and we had to chase them.

We didn’t have a previous solution.

I was not present during the initial setup.

Pricing and licensing are always high compared to other products in the market. Storage is very expensive as well.

It is a good product, but expensive.

I am just a user, and from a user's perspective, it does the job.

It has quite extensive support in terms of integration. If you want to do anything, there are tools for that.

Its reporting can be improved. That's the only complaint I have heard. I don't need the reporting part, but I know that other people in the organization need it.

In terms of new features, I got everything that I needed from the tool. If they want to expand the capabilities to different things, they can cover topics besides log aggregation, etc.

I have been using this solution for two years. I am not using it on a daily basis.

It is stable. We don't seem to have any problems related to bugs. We are very happy with it.

We have our own internal team for its maintenance.

I would recommend this solution. If you are a technical person, it does what you need. If you are not a technical person and you require graphs, that's a different story.

I would rate Splunk a ten out of ten because I have no problems with it.

Because I'm security focused, I prefer the security features such as Splunk Phantom and Splunk Enterprise Security.

We need to get a Splunk Cloud instance inside South Africa's borders. At this stage, we are pushing Splunk Cloud, but it is not yet within South Africa's borders. So we've got data sovereignty issues, especially with government organizations.

Technical support could be improved as well.

Splunk can be an expensive solution. I think that they need to change their pricing model. At present, it is based on the number of gigabytes that you ingest into the Splunk system. Their competitors are now starting with a pricing model where you pay per device talking back. If Splunk could have a similar alternative, it would then allow people to choose the data model they want such as set data or a set number of devices.

I have been using Splunk for three years.

The technical support here in South Africa hasn't been great, but I understand why as we make up less than 3% of Splunk's total revenue in the world.

The initial setup isn't overly complex, but it's not easy either.

The pricing model is based on the number of gigabytes that you ingest into the Splunk system. So it can be an expensive solution.

Plan your requirements properly from the beginning so that you can get the most value in a shorter space of time.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Splunk at six.