Symantec Data Center Security Reviews

Name: Symantec Data Center Security
Brand: Broadcom
Rating: 3.8 (11 reviews)

3.8 out of 5

11 reviews
81% willing to recommend

400 followers

What is Symantec Data Center Security?

Docker containers make it easy to develop, deploy, and deliver applications where containers can be deployed and brought down in a matter of seconds. This flexibility makes it very useful for DevOps to automate deployment of containers. Symantec Data Center Security: Server Advanced provides agentless Docker container protection that allows you to achieve the performance benefits of Docker without sacrificing security. Full application control enables administrator privilege de-escalation, patch mitigation, and protection against zero day threats in today's heterogeneous data centers.

Get the Symantec Data Center Security Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Symantec Data Center Security, Trend Micro Deep Security, VMware NSX and more!

Symantec Data Center Security is the #11 ranked solution in best Cloud Security companies. PeerSpot users give Symantec Data Center Security an average rating of 7.6 out of 10. Symantec Data Center Security is most commonly compared to Trend Micro Deep Security: Symantec Data Center Security vs Trend Micro Deep Security. Symantec Data Center Security is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 75% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 19% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Data Center Security

February 2025

Get the report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Featured reviews

Atul-Vats

Consultant at Tata Consultancy

The negative aspect of that particular product is the fact it has a very, very, very complex policy structure. A user or administrator making the policy in the DCS should have a very thorough knowledge of the operating system or policy making. You have to be very specific about the data structure. If you want to secure a Linux server, an administrator should be very confident about how the directory structure of Linux, how Linux works, and where it puts the important logs. You have to be very cautious about the complete path, and you have to write it over there in the policy part. If you are not very specific, there will be a lot of noise in the system. You're going to receive thousands of events that are false positives. The fine-tuning of the policy is a very complex thing in the DCS itself. Another negative aspect that I have observed is if the product gets installed on the kernel level of any non-Windows server, it has some issues, comparability issues. Sometimes the product doesn't work properly, so it shuts down the machine and crashes the system. There are many cases in which I've observed the DCS crashing the system.

Read full review

Shahram Dehghani

Security Technical Manager at Modaberan Fanavari Pasargad

The primary focus of data center security often revolves around serving customers who offer services to other clients within the data center. For example, if I operate a data center and provide security services, third-party customers might purchase virtual machine products within my data center. These products are automatically deployed, and we safeguard these virtual machines using intrusion prevention system features. This aspect is considered the most valuable part because when we set up these security policies, it's as if we're fortifying the entire infrastructure. It's not just about having good technical support; it's about having a robust IPS and comprehensive DOS prevention system on those operating systems. The advantage of Data Center Security is its ease of use and that it serves as a single unified platform, where I can apply all my security policies to protect that server.

Read full review

Ravi_M

Senior System Administrator - Cyber Security at Sapiens Technologies India Pvt Ltd

One area where Symantec Data Center Security could improve is in refining its precision, especially when it comes to allowing certain parts. Right now, it is a bit like an all-or-nothing deal, and it could be improved by recognizing specific cases where certain parts should or shouldn't be allowed. Also, adding more compatibility with common products like Microsoft would be a plus. It should play nicely with other tools we commonly use rather than limiting our options, making it more user-friendly and flexible. Currently, with Symantec Data Center Security, we have to manually enable prevention policies to allow these patches. It would be much smoother if, by default, the system recognized and allowed these patches without needing us to intervene each time.

Read full review

Symantec Data Center Security mindshare

As of February 2025, the mindshare of Symantec Data Center Security in the Cloud and Data Center Security category stands at 1.7%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud and Data Center Security

PeerAnalyst reports

Type	Title	Date
Category	Cloud and Data Center Security	Feb 22, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Feb 22, 2025	Download
Comparison	Symantec Data Center Security vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation	Feb 22, 2025	Download
Comparison	Symantec Data Center Security vs VMware NSX	Feb 22, 2025	Download
Comparison	Symantec Data Center Security vs Illumio	Feb 22, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Trend Micro Deep Security	4.3	3.2%	94%	89 interviews Add to research
VMware NSX	4.0	13.8%	88%	102 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

Symantec Data Center Security's valuable features include built-in hard disk protection, centralized management console, and user-friendly tools. Users appreciate file integrity monitoring, comprehensive system lockdown with detection and prevention capabilities, partnership-oriented data center security features, robust hardening with customizable rules, and precise access control. Its granularity in policy application and endpoint protection are commended features, along with providing a single unified platform for applying security policies and protecting servers and data in the infrastructure.

"The real strength lies in its straightforward approach, offering just two key policies: prevention and detection."
"The ability to finely control permissions and restrictions on servers or assets through a customizable rule set is a key strength."
"We use the product to prevent unauthorized access to data, systems, and servers. It provides essential features for data center security."

Room for Improvement

Symantec Data Center Security can be improved by enhancing platform metrics and integration capabilities. It faces challenges with Microsoft Defender and has complex policy structures. Centralized management options are limited and technical support needs more local representation in India. There are compatibility and performance issues with certain operating systems and virtualization environments. Improved user interface, reporting capabilities, and flexibility in deployment would be beneficial, along with better compatibility with common products like Microsoft.

"Adding more compatibility with common products like Microsoft would be a plus."
"It would be advantageous if Symantec or Broadcom, given the rebranding, could simplify the process, enabling users to leverage the antivirus functionality more easily."
"The product blocks certain processes, even after allowlisting them."

Pricing

Enterprise buyers have reported that Symantec Data Center Security is generally more expensive compared to other solutions like CrowdStrike. While some perceive licensing costs as reasonable, others find the product notably costly. Pricing experiences vary, with some users not fully aware of the financial specifics. Organizations should consider these insights when evaluating investment value against their specific security needs.

"It is notably more expensive when compared to other solutions."
"The product is a bit costly."
"Compared to some other solutions, such as CrowdStrike, Symantec is more expensive."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations use Symantec Data Center Security primarily to protect data integrity, secure Docker containers, and enforce access policies. They implement system lockdown and anomaly detection on critical servers, particularly for legacy and Linux systems. The focus includes certificate-based integration, identity mapping, and firewall security for centralized operations. This ensures that file changes, especially in developer environments, are monitored and approved, maintaining code integrity and safeguarding against vulnerabilities and cyber threats.

Service and Support

Symantec Data Center Security customer service elicits mixed reactions. It is praised for being fantastic by some, while others face regional shortages in India. Support quality is inconsistent, influenced by personnel changes post-Broadcom transition, with reports of insufficient speed and expertise. Some users encounter known issues but receive effective solutions once identified. Support responsiveness varies, sometimes being efficient and at times insufficiently quick, especially when compared to competitors. Users often supplement support with in-house problem-solving or consultants.

Deployment

Many users found Symantec Data Center Security's setup straightforward, though complexity arose with dependencies, policy configuration, and SQL knowledge. Deployments varied by environment, often requiring collaboration with other teams. Timeframes ranged from hours to months, influenced by operational demands and infrastructure. Installation was easy, but managing server restarts in production posed challenges. Companies executed thorough testing and resource assessments before full deployment, and support for different deployment models provided flexibility based on requirements.

Scalability

Symantec Data Center Security appears scalable for large enterprises. While many find it effective in handling thousands of users and non-working stations, some express concerns about its manageability, highlighting complexity in monitoring across extensive server networks. Several users mention ease of scaling, but note room for improvement compared to other options, giving it a moderate to high scalability rating. Some find its built-in features sufficient without needing additional scalability enhancements.

Stability

Symantec Data Center Security shows mixed stability. Some find it stable with few issues, while others experience significant problems, especially on non-Windows systems, leading to disrupted operations. Many users note that hardware compatibility and version upgrades can pose challenges. There is praise for reliability on Windows and its simplicity in agent components. Stability ratings vary widely, from two to nine out of ten.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Symantec Data Center Security Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.