We use the solution to just capture the loan forms and the insurance request or request for coverage.
Software Integrator / Project Manager at a university with 5,001-10,000 employees
A scalable and stable solution that is simple to use and has good customer support
Pros and Cons
- "The tool is low code which saves you from a developer."
- "It would be nice if the tool has more connectors to different systems. It is an expensive solution."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
They're trying to do a digital transfer. So the benefit is the cost of not having to use paper transactions versus electronic.I would say they are saving about twenty percent of the cost- based on the fully manual database process that they had before.
What is most valuable?
The tool is low code which saves you from a developer.
What needs improvement?
It would be nice if the tool has more connectors to different systems. It is an expensive solution.
Buyer's Guide
Tungsten TotalAgility
January 2025
Learn what your peers think about Tungsten TotalAgility. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2025.
832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is a scalable solution.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support is good. The only thing is that we paid for the nine to five support. Within nine to five, we got the support. We had a problem on the weekend, but we really didn't have nine to five. But on other days they responded within two hours.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
We didn't have to bring in anybody external to help us.
What other advice do I have?
I would advise others to just plan because if you do your planning with any product, you shouldn't have any problems. I know we did a lot of planning before. We read all the documentation, and then it went smoothly. You know, the only advice is that if you're budget or cost-sensitive, don't expect to find a solution out there. If you're really tight and you can't afford the code in front of you, maybe you should look and see if you can get it cheaper. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Co-Founder | CTO at Fourcicle
Is user-friendly, has good documentation, and is easy to set up
Pros and Cons
- "It is user-friendly and has good documentation. It's good for developing communication and has a lot of the APIs needed for this purpose. There aren't a lot of software options available from this time period; this is the only one from 2013 that has this concept of microservices."
- "TotalAgility needs to improve communication with ECMs or other file storage systems because TotalAgility does not have file storage. A good improvement would be to create file storage or integrate with other file storage tools that are currently available."
What is our primary use case?
We use TotalAgility in the loan approval process, such as during car loan approvals. In this case, when a client needs to buy a car, we have to process a lot of documents regarding the car and the client, and we need to match documents. We use middleware to get this match, and we use TotalAgility to orchestrate the process.
We built a website portal to consult TotalAgility APIs because we need to start the documents, for example. We need to use ECM in this case; however, TotalAgility does not integrate well with ECMs. It's a BPM. It stores documents and files and consults the files to match the data that exists in TotalAgility with the content in the ECM.
What is most valuable?
It is user-friendly and has good documentation. It's good for developing communication and has a lot of the APIs needed for this purpose. There aren't a lot of software options available from this time period; this is the only one from 2013 that has this concept of microservices.
What needs improvement?
TotalAgility needs to improve communication with ECMs or other file storage systems because TotalAgility does not have file storage. A good improvement would be to create file storage or integrate with other file storage tools that are currently available.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using Kofax TotalAgility since 2013.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is more or less scalable. We had some problems to resolve. It's difficult to make it troubleshoot to understand why we have some problems. APM observability is something that doesn't exist in TotalAgility.
How are customer service and support?
We don't have Latin American support, and it was difficult to get support when we had scalability issues.
How was the initial setup?
Kofax TotalAgility is easy to setup and can take about two or three hours to deploy.
In our case, we needed more than one instance running at the same time, which involved more detailed configurations. We needed to prepare clusters.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Kofax TotalAgility is very expensive.
What other advice do I have?
I recommend training your people because your team may need to support this tool. If you are in Latin America, you may not have Latin American support or resident support. In this case, you will need to become specialists in TotalAgility and resolve a lot of problems through troubleshooting. So, I recommend training all your people to get this knowledge and enjoy the features that you have.
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Kofax TotalAgility at nine.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Private Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Tungsten TotalAgility
January 2025
Learn what your peers think about Tungsten TotalAgility. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2025.
832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Vice president at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Good performance with great data extraction and auto-classification features
Pros and Cons
- "Data extraction and auto-classification are great features."
- "Kofax needs to improve the low-code or citizen developers."
What is our primary use case?
Our primary use case of TotalAgility is for extracting data from structured and unstructured documents. Structured documents refer to statements and documents that have a defined structure. Our unstructured data refers to non-standard forms or documents where keywords are required to extract data. We are customers of TotalAgility and I'm the company vice president.
What is most valuable?
Data extraction and auto-classification are great features. We have over 15 applications, and the performance is good; we're able to extract the data that we need.
What needs improvement?
Kofax needs to improve the low-code or citizen developers rather than focusing on other cloud solutions for data extraction. We've found them to be a little more robust on their low-code citizen developers, but they need to improve quickly in order to compete with other market vendors.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using this solution for five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable and we have very few production incidents. We haven't had any issues in the last few months.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable. If you want to add more power, you need to process more and you can always add more transformation servers that do actual extraction and classification. Scalability is a matter of how quickly your company or your environment can set up a VM. That's all it is.
How are customer service and support?
The vendor technical support is good. They respond relatively quickly although it can sometimes take a little while to get a resolution. Overall, they're good.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We also use Microsoft Cloud solution and IBM Datacap. I think Kofax is more advanced than Datacap; it's easier to use and easier to develop. Microsoft has more in terms of low-code citizen development. They are more advanced than Kofax, although Kofax is a complete product, and therefore provides more features.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is easy and it's also easy to upgrade. There are challenges but in comparison to other products, it's easy to upgrade and easy to deploy. Deployment generally doesn't take long unless there's a dependency on other systems that need to be tested. We now have an in-house team and deployment usually takes less than an hour.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The licensing cost is competitive. There is the initial cost and contract so it depends on the agreement you reach with the vendor. Licensing is on a per-page basis. Other products have licensing based on the CPUs, so if you're adding power, then you'll have to think about purchasing more licenses.
What other advice do I have?
I think Kofax is a good product. I would definitely recommend it to anyone looking for document extraction or classification, or data extraction from structured and unstructured documents. They've been on the market for a long time and are one of the market leaders.
I rate this solution eight out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Kofax Certified Professional Developer at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees
A low-code, intelligent, and all-in-one platform with good integration capabilities and good support
Pros and Cons
- "Its integration capabilities are valuable. It has low code/no code features. You have to do minimal coding."
- "Room for improvement would be better OCR functionality in terms of Arabic OCR. There should be better accuracy."
What is our primary use case?
It is an intelligent automation platform. It is for the automation of processes.
I am using the latest version, and in terms of deployment, it supports both on-premises and cloud deployments.
How has it helped my organization?
You can build applications or design forms with minimal coding. Its target audience includes business users who have some IT skills. They're not software developers. They are citizen developers. If they have that IT mindset, they can build and automate some of the processes.
If you have different applications running, but they don't talk to each other, you can use KTA to integrate them and remove the manual steps. By using its various tools and capabilities, you can enhance the performance of humans. An example would be a bank where a customer service representative deals with the end customers in the bank. He accepts some forms and requests, and then he has to go to the core banking system, such as web banking or internet banking system, and connect to Excel sheets or other different applications that he might be using. With KTA, all the systems can be integrated into a single process. The customer service representative can track the complete job in one KTA system, which is integrated with all these diverse systems. He can get visibility in terms of the SLA, performance indicators, and time spent completing the job. The management can see the KPIs.
What is most valuable?
Its integration capabilities are valuable. It has low code/no code features. You have to do minimal coding.
It is not just a process designer or a traditional BPM software; it is an intelligent platform that uses robotics, electronic signatures, BPM process management, case management, and document capture with OCR technologies. It is a platform for automating all the manual processes and semi-automatic processes in an organization.
What needs improvement?
Room for improvement would be better OCR functionality in terms of Arabic OCR. There should be better accuracy.
In addition, when you design the forms, there should be inbuilt facilities for collaboration, document sharing, and providing feedback and comments. All those features should be there in the form design.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have worked with this solution off and on for five to six years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a very stable product. Once you go live, the process that you've automated is satisfactory, and it fulfills your requirement. It works fine.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is very scalable. It is also easily scalable. If we want to have a very big application, we can have a lot of servers or instances.
In terms of its users, because I'm the Professional Services Consultant, I don't use it, but we have some customers with thousands of users. It is being used in very big companies where thousands of users are there.
How are customer service and support?
It has its own knowledge base. The whole documentation is available for free for everyone, and there is also a dedicated technical support team. They have a very highly skilled technical support team. You get very good quality support. I would rate them a 5 out of 5 because they're really skilled.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have used other BPM software previously. I switched to Kofax because it has a lot of options in terms of intelligent automation. It has its own RPA, its own OCR engine, and its own process designer. The mobile component is also there, and a lot of verticals are there for invoice automation, process automation, accounts payables automation, customer onboarding, and check processing. There are a lot of applications and a lot of tools in the kit. It is an all-in-one package.
How was the initial setup?
It depends on the size of the implementation. You can do the installation very fast in just 15 to 20 minutes with a few clicks, but because it is an enterprise application, you might have requirements for load balancing and high availability. You might want to have a failover system for disaster recovery. In such cases, it will take more time.
What about the implementation team?
It was done in-house. It should be done by trained professionals of KTA. That's the best practice. The end users or customers can also do it, but they should get trained on that.
The number of people required for deployment and implementation depends on the size of the implementation. In a small organization with a few users and one or two servers, only one person can maintain it. A very big organization with a lot of processes, users, and servers, such as 40 servers, would need more people for maintenance.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It has a perpetual license. You pay once in a lifetime for the volume of scans you will do and the number of users you will have. You can have participants or regular users, and you can have developers and administrators. So, once you purchase it, it is for a lifetime, and then every year, you have to pay for the maintenance. There is an annual maintenance cost, which is about 18% of the licensing cost.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this solution. Nobody is working on paper and pen now. Everybody has some applications. Even Excel sheets are gone now. People are using robots and BPM software, but applications are disconnected. KTA will connect all the systems and lead the intelligent automation.
I would rate it a 9 out of 10. I would not rate it a 10 out of 10 because no product is 100% ready with all the features. There is always room for improvement.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
ESM consultant/ Kofax developer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Easy to set up with great monitoring and lots of built-in features
Pros and Cons
- "Now it has an OCR, optical character recognition, engine where it can extract data from the document."
- "Sometimes there isn't enough accuracy when it comes to extracts."
What is our primary use case?
I'm using a Kofax document extraction application, however, it doesn't only do that. It can also capture some stuff and can export and extract data from documents.
One use case would be that we develop the application and deploy it on the server, and then we get users to process whatever that we develop for them depending on the type of document that they're using. For example, if they have to extract data from proof of residence, you'll get a name, address, et cetera, depending on the client. You can scan through a document using this application and once they've scanned through a document, there are different queues that the document goes through. The first one will be the scan queue and then the next will be document review where they're reviewing the document now structured with current data.
We've preconfigured everything on the server. Once they confirm everything, they can move into the next queue, validation. Validation is making sure that the data is valid and all the mandatory fields are there or you cannot submit. The ID number on the document, that's mandatory, the user has to enter that. The tool checks those kinds of things. And, depending on the document, they have to also make some calculations.
We used to work with statements as well, bank statements, and we would perform calculations. That's the validation.
The export is the last part. Once they submit the validated documentation, a user can move now to export. We would also call in some services to come and then check data and then compare it and then populate it. You can export it as a PDF or text. Some data is exported to IBM Content Manager or Content Navigator. Kofax itself has types of export connectors. Depending on the client, we will integrate with different solutions.
How has it helped my organization?
Being able to extract data from documents is great.
The capability of this tool is great. It can work like your C Sharp, your Java, et cetera. We had to replace something that was developed using rebe.net and we built it using TotalAgility for a call center department. For example, if a bank was dealing with a lost or stolen card, the client would provide details, and we would save them in a PDF. We had a two-step system where we could take the PDF we created and deploy it into another system for extraction and export. It made everything very easy.
What is most valuable?
It has its own monitor, where it monitors all the Kofax servers. This is great for monitoring. Other solutions don't offer this. If there are web services running or other things, it will monitor for that.
It has different types of export connectors where it exports to. Depending on the client, it integrates with a lot of systems out there.
There are also already a lot of built-in features, meaning you don't have to install and integrate many third-party plugins. It has a lot of its own stuff.
Now it has an OCR, optical character recognition, engine where it can extract data from the document.
You can deploy the CSV file and put it within Kofax, and then it'll search from the CSV file as well. For example, let's say you have a long list of names. It's integrated with scanners so it's easy to find the data you need.
They have cloud platforms you can use as well.
They really are trying to reinvent themselves all the time.
The initial setup is easy.
What needs improvement?
Sometimes there isn't enough accuracy when it comes to extracts. A user has to validate the data to make sure that the data is correct. If that step is improved, then it's perfect. We need a level of hundred percent on the extracted data. Right now, we need a user to validate and make sure that the data is correct, which is an extra step and takes some time.
This is especially true if the documents we are extracting from are handwritten. A's sometimes read as 8's, for example.
For the most part, they have so many different aspects right in Kofax, I can't speak to if there are any missing features.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution since 2013.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
You do need to keep it updated so that you can avoid dealing with bugs and things of that nature.
I do find the stability to be quite good. It's been pretty easy to maintain.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We're a small company. Maybe only seven people really use it. We do use it on a daily basis.
It's pretty easy to scale.
How are customer service and support?
We have been in touch with technical support in the past. They were quite helpful and we are satisfied with the level of service on offer.
How was the initial setup?
It's easy to set up the solution. It's not an overly complex process. It does depend on the level of experience a user has, however, I found that it was pretty quick to learn. The amount of time it takes to deploy also depends on the scope of the project. Sometimes, it can take a while.
In terms of maintenance, they keep on delivering new versions of Kofax. If you are using an older version, you find that you come across issues. Maybe using an older version, they will tell you that they no longer support it. If you log an incident with Kofax directly, they will tell you that they no longer support it or not and you may need to upgrade. You might find that the application is not performing as it's supposed to if you do not maintain it by updating it.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Everything is included under the license.
It's a bit expensive. We were using TotalAgility at one of South Africa's biggest banks, and we had to use a tool or an application that is a Kofax competitor, and their license was a bit cheaper. The manager there said that the Kofax licenses are expensive compared to the competitor. However, we do see the quality it brings. We prefer to pay more for Kofax as we see its value.
What other advice do I have?
We are a Kofax partner in South Africa.
I would recommend the product depending on the type of service that you want to get. From my experience, there are other products that are like TotalAgility, however, for me, it's the best product based on the interface configuring, which is quite simple. I've used other products and it's a bit complicated to get something that's so simple - which is what you get when using TotalAgility.
I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Technical lead
Has good scan, capture, classification, and extraction capabilities, but isn't easy to set up and its low-code capability could be improved
Pros and Cons
- "Essentially, Kofax TotalAgility as a whole is quite nice. As of now, we've only been able to use and explore its document classification and extraction capabilities. We haven't explored and used the case management capability yet, but the scan and capture capabilities we've been using heavily and those are quite good. Our solutions are mainly around those areas of Kofax TotalAgility. We haven't explored the product a lot, but the capabilities we've explored are good."
- "Kofax TotalAgility is quite vast and complex as a product. We came from Kofax Capture and Kofax Transformation, then we started learning Kofax TotalAgility, so there are a lot of things that were quite straightforward in the Kofax Capture and Kofax Transformation cross-motion modules, but to do those in Kofax TotalAgility was a bit more complex or quite long-winded and could be improved. In the next release of Kofax TotalAgility, it would be good to have a straightforward low-code or no-code process because there were instances we struggled with having to put logic into a script or a .NET script, then calling that script, instead of the process being low-code, no-code."
What is our primary use case?
We are systems integrators, and we build solutions for our customers, so we use Kofax TotalAgility to build solutions for accounts payable and mailroom purposes.
What is most valuable?
Essentially, Kofax TotalAgility as a whole is quite nice. As of now, we've only been able to use and explore its document classification and extraction capabilities. We haven't explored and used the case management capability yet, but the scan and capture capabilities we've been using heavily and those are quite good. Our solutions are mainly around those areas of Kofax TotalAgility. We haven't explored the product a lot, but the capabilities we've explored are good.
What needs improvement?
Kofax TotalAgility is quite vast and complex as a product. We came from Kofax Capture and Kofax Transformation, then we started learning Kofax TotalAgility, so there are a lot of things that were quite straightforward in the Kofax Capture and Kofax Transformation cross-motion modules, but to do those in Kofax TotalAgility was a bit more complex or quite long-winded and could be improved.
In the next release of Kofax TotalAgility, it would be good to have a straightforward low-code or no-code process because there were instances we struggled with having to put logic into a script or a .NET script, then calling that script, instead of the process being low-code, no-code.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have three years of experience with Kofax TotalAgility.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Kofax TotalAgility is a stable solution, as long as you know what you're doing and you have an understanding of product features, for example, how to use and how the features work, whatever you build will be sustainable and stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Kofax TotalAgility is a product we can scale.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support wise, because I've been working with Kofax not just on Kofax TotalAgility, but other products as well, and I've been working with Kofax products from the past ten to twelve years, the support is quite good and the support team responds and assists in a timely fashion. Kofax support is very good.
How was the initial setup?
Kofax TotalAgility was not easy to set up. If you talk about the product being full-blown, and even in the solution side of my company, setting it up was not as straightforward. In the latest version of Kofax TotalAgility, there's this feature called Quick Capture which I haven't tried, but I've seen a demo, so if I believe what was on the demo, then that process is quite easy to set up, but with the solutions my company builds, as far as the setup of Kofax TotalAgility is concerned, wasn't easy. You have to do three processes, and unless you have something already in place which you can copy or reuse, you have to set up the processes from scratch, but as long as you know what you're doing, then it can be slightly easier to set up, but you just can't do it in a blink of an eye. It's not that easy, but if you know what you're doing, then it won't be very complex or very hard, so I could say the setup has medium difficulty.
From a deployment perspective, how long it takes would still depend on how complex the solution you have built is, but based on my experience, it has medium complexity. You can create packages, then you can export and import the packages onto the designated deployment environment, but then if you have some additional databases or additional custom DLLs that you might be interfacing, or if you have an element of RPA or any of the external web service, those would be additional, so again depending upon the complexity of your solution, the deployment time will vary.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The licensing cost for Kofax TotalAgility is very expensive, though I'm unable to give you the range, the sales representatives of my company say that the product is quite expensive.
What other advice do I have?
I started with version 7.3 of Kofax TotalAgility. I'm currently using version 7.6.
Kofax TotalAgility isn't used within my company, but my company builds solutions through it and deploys the solutions to customers, and currently, the product has twenty to twenty-five users.
My advice to people looking into using Kofax TotalAgility is that if the deployment is on-premises, as long as you're willing to invest even if it's expensive, it can be a good solution. It can be a good product for BPM. You can do BPM projects with it. You can do case management and capture extraction with Kofax TotalAgility, but it can also integrate quite seamlessly with third-party applications, so it's quite good. For small to medium-scale companies who would still like to utilize the product or have interest in the product, it's best to leverage either the cloud solution directly from Kofax or a multitenant system, for example, building a multitenant system for small-scale industries or companies, and sell the solution on a subscription basis to make it a little more cost-effective, to save on spending rather than having an on-premises solution spending on hardware and software. You can buy on a subscription basis or SaaS and benefit from it.
As I haven't completely explored Kofax TotalAgility, based on what I know, I would rate the product seven out of ten.
My company is a partner of Kofax TotalAgility and used to be called a diamond partner. My company is a reseller of the product and builds solutions using Kofax TotalAgility for customers who are the end users. There's one department: the outsourcing department that's an internal customer that uses the product.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Senior Software Engineer at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
A scalable and straightforward UI- friendly solution
Pros and Cons
- "Kofax is very easy to use, UI-friendly and allows easy data extraction."
- "Kofax should improve its handwritten extractions."
What is our primary use case?
We use this solution primarily for its data extraction. It is a very simple OCR compared to other OCRs available on the market. Kofax is very easy to use, UI-friendly and allows easy data extraction.
What needs improvement?
Kofax should improve its handwritten extractions. I believe Google has some OCR that extracts handwritten data, but it is very costly from a business perspective. Kofax can extract handwritten data, but even an improvement of ten percent would be great.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using this solution for three years and currently use version 7.10.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a stable solution. It is very straightforward, and we have not faced any issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is a scalable solution. I am the only developer using Kofax TotalAgility in my company, while the others use KTM.
How are customer service and support?
We have used technical support in the past, and I rate the technical support a nine out of ten.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We used only KTM before and now use Kofax TotalAgility (KTA). KTA is the new version combining KC and KTM.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward and not complex. However, it is complicated if you try to play the solution in the IAS server. On the other hand, the deployment did not take much time either.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We have a license, but I am unsure of the details around it.
What other advice do I have?
I rate this solution a nine out of ten. If Kofax improves their handwritten mode settings, I will give them a ten out of ten.
I would recommend Kofax TotalAgility. We previously worked in the RPA domain and faced some difficulties using it. But with Kofax TotalAgility, there is no difficulty. It is easy to develop, and developers can drag and drop. There are a lot of activities you can perform with it. It is an LCAP platform, benefiting those who don't know how to code.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
Software Engineer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Poor OCR engine and technical support, but low maintenance requited
Pros and Cons
- "Kofax TotalAgility is stable."
- "Kofax TotalAgility could improve the OTR engine. The page OTR engine is not accurate in predicting the data properly. If you provide many features which are good for business process management without an accurate OTR engine people will not want it."
What is our primary use case?
We are using Kofax TotalAgility for data extraction for the mortgage industry.
How has it helped my organization?
we have seen a significant cost reduction by passing many manual interventions that where required to identify and extract data from different Tax Forms .
We have also increased out throughput and accuracy.
What is most valuable?
Seamless integration with BPM tool.
What needs improvement?
Kofax TotalAgility could improve the OCR engine. The page OCR engine is not accurate in predicting the data properly. And also the Trainable document separation methodology is not accurate in classification even with a significant larger data set.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Kofax TotalAgility for approximately two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Kofax TotalAgility is stable.
How are customer service and support?
The support is not good. They are not responsive.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of Kofax TotalAgility is easy. It does not require training. It's self-explanatory.
What about the implementation team?
We did the deployment of the solution ourselves.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price of this solution is less than some of the competition.
What other advice do I have?
The tool is not up yo the mark at all for what we needed it for.
When deciding if this solution is the right fit one has to look at the tradeoff between cost and accuracy. If they want more accuracy instead of the cost-effectiveness of this solution then they will have to choose something else.
I rate Kofax TotalAgility a three out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Tungsten TotalAgility Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: January 2025
Product Categories
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)Popular Comparisons
ABBYY Vantage
WorkFusion
HyperScience
UiPath Document Understanding
OpenText Intelligent Capture
IBM Datacap
Instabase
Hyland Brainware
Ephesoft Transact
Infrrd OCR
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Tungsten TotalAgility Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- When evaluating ABBYY, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What is the difference between Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and Intelligent Process Automation (IPA)?
- Would you choose to produce an intelligent automation solution or develop plugins for the big five (SAP, Oracle, IBM, Microsoft and Google)?
- What is the best intelligent document processing solution?
- What is an intelligent document processing solution?
- Why is Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) important for companies?