Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Wallarm NG WAF based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF, and Imperva DDoS.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Wallarm NG WAF surpasses its competitors by offering AI-driven security, real-time threat detection, and seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines, ensuring robust protection for modern web applications and APIs.
Wallarm Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Wallarm, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Wallarm NG WAF excels in API security and integrates well with modern environments. In comparison, AWS WAF provides advanced traffic filtering within AWS infrastructure, favoring users seeking seamless integration and resource scalability, while Wallarm NG WAF is preferred for its pricing transparency and proactive customer support.
Wallarm NG WAF offers affordable pricing and integrates seamlessly with modern development workflows. In comparison, F5 Advanced WAF delivers advanced threat protection with extensive scalability. Wallarm appeals to budget-conscious users, while F5 caters to enterprises prioritizing comprehensive security infrastructure.
Wallarm NG WAF offers a straightforward setup at a low cost, while F5 Advanced WAF has a more complex setup with higher associated costs, highlighting a significant difference in implementation investment between the two services.
Wallarm NG WAF offers a straightforward setup at a low cost, while F5 Advanced WAF has a more complex setup with higher associated costs, highlighting a significant difference in implementation investment between the two services.
Imperva DDoS offers comprehensive network protection, appealing to those focused on minimal downtime during attacks. In comparison, Wallarm NG WAF prioritizes web application security with innovative features, attracting tech buyers seeking superior application-level protection despite potentially higher costs.
Imperva DDoS incurs setup costs that users find reasonable, while Wallarm NG WAF offers a more competitive pricing structure appealing to budget-conscious users.
Imperva DDoS incurs setup costs that users find reasonable, while Wallarm NG WAF offers a more competitive pricing structure appealing to budget-conscious users.
Wallarm NG WAF offers competitive pricing, quick integration, and robust support, appealing to businesses prioritizing simplicity. In comparison, Akamai App and API Protector delivers comprehensive features and extensive security capabilities, making it attractive for those needing advanced API protection and long-term value despite higher costs.
Wallarm NG WAF has a straightforward setup cost, while Akamai App and API Protector presents a more complex pricing structure. Wallarm focuses on simplicity, whereas Akamai emphasizes a comprehensive approach with its multiple pricing layers.
Wallarm NG WAF has a straightforward setup cost, while Akamai App and API Protector presents a more complex pricing structure. Wallarm focuses on simplicity, whereas Akamai emphasizes a comprehensive approach with its multiple pricing layers.
Wallarm NG WAF appeals to tech buyers with its cloud integration and real-time threat detection. In comparison, NGINX App Protect attracts those needing robust security and microservices support. Wallarm's ease of deployment suits agile teams, whereas NGINX provides comprehensive security tools for larger enterprises.
Wallarm NG WAF offers a straightforward setup with no obvious initial cost, whereas NGINX App Protect often involves higher upfront expenses for deployment.
Wallarm NG WAF offers a straightforward setup with no obvious initial cost, whereas NGINX App Protect often involves higher upfront expenses for deployment.
Fastly excels in pricing and support with advanced caching and scalability, appealing to those prioritizing rapid content delivery. In comparison, Wallarm NG WAF offers superior AI-driven threat detection and API security, benefiting businesses focused on comprehensive cybersecurity despite higher initial costs.
Fastly has a minimal setup cost, making it accessible, while Wallarm NG WAF has a more substantial initial investment requirement, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
Fastly has a minimal setup cost, making it accessible, while Wallarm NG WAF has a more substantial initial investment requirement, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
Wallarm NG WAF is praised for cost-effectiveness, featuring automated anomaly detection and API protection. In comparison, Fastly Next-Gen WAF excels with real-time threat intelligence and scalability, offering long-term value for large enterprises despite higher initial costs, enhanced by flexible integration options.
Wallarm NG WAF offers a low initial setup cost, appealing to budgets focused on cost efficiency, while The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) requires a higher investment, reflecting its advanced integrations and enterprise-level capabilities.
Wallarm NG WAF offers a low initial setup cost, appealing to budgets focused on cost efficiency, while The Fastly Next-Gen WAF (powered by Signal Sciences) requires a higher investment, reflecting its advanced integrations and enterprise-level capabilities.
