Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NGINX App Protect vs Wallarm NG WAF comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
NGINX App Protect customer support has mixed reviews, with varying responsiveness and cost opinions, and issues with occasional slow responses.
No sentiment score available
Users praise Wallarm NG WAF for its responsive, knowledgeable support, effective solutions, clear communication, and consistent customer service quality.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.2
NGINX App Protect faces issues with configuration, costs, support, integration, documentation, upgrades, security, automation, and communication about features.
No sentiment score available
Users desire better documentation, support responsiveness, fewer false positives, smoother integration, flexible pricing, and frequent updates for Wallarm NG WAF.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
NGINX App Protect's scalability is mixed, with good results for small groups but issues with larger deployments and management.
No sentiment score available
Wallarm NG WAF efficiently scales to handle substantial traffic, integrates smoothly, and offers flexible cloud and on-premise deployment options.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
NGINX App Protect pricing ranges from $3,000 to $40,000+ annually based on architecture, usage, and renewal costs.
No sentiment score available
<p>Wallarm NG WAF offers flexible, cost-effective subscription pricing with customizable options for scalable enterprise security needs.</p>
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
NGINX App Protect is reliable and efficient, scoring highly in stability, but could improve in HTML5 availability.
No sentiment score available
Wallarm NG WAF is praised for stability, effective threat detection, seamless integration, robust scalability, and strong support.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
7.8
Users value NGINX App Protect for flexible deployment, security features, robust functionality, and seamless integration into CICD pipelines.
No sentiment score available
Wallarm NG WAF is praised for real-time threat detection, API protection, scalability, easy deployment, and detailed analytics.
 

Categories and Ranking

NGINX App Protect
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
16th
Ranking in API Security
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Container Security (21st)
Wallarm NG WAF
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
35th
Ranking in API Security
12th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of NGINX App Protect is 2.2%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wallarm NG WAF is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
 

Featured Reviews

Tomaz Sobczak - PeerSpot reviewer
Signature-based detection, DOS protection, and bot protection
NGINX App Protect is easier to automate and configure, or manage from an API. This is good for securing applications. However, it's not suitable for more complex tasks. NGINX App Protect positively impacted performance changes. There's a cache or it works like a proxy, so it can speed up applications. It can also offload some functions from servers, which NGINX can handle faster.
it_user662952 - PeerSpot reviewer
Active threat detection and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us.
I would say that the active threat detection feature and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us. With active threat detection, we are no longer over-swamped with tons of useless events. As all the payloads from malicious requests are analysed with a cloud scanner, we don’t need to do this manually. We also built up an incident management process when Wallarm confirmed that some of the attacks are exposing actual vulnerabilities. Adaptive security rules allowed us to use WAF in blocking mode which was almost impossible previously.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Real Estate/Law Firm
8%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with NGINX App Protect?
The product's price is high, making it an area of concern where improvements are required. The tool's licensing model is also not good. The product should have more documentation, especially like t...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

NGINX WAF, NGINX Web Application Firewall
Wallarm NG-WAF
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Panasonic. Miro. Rappi. Wargaming. Gannett. Omio. Acronis. Workforce Software. Tipalti. SEMRush.
Find out what your peers are saying about NGINX App Protect vs. Wallarm NG WAF and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.