We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and Wallarm NG WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The most valuable feature of AWS WAF is its highly configurable rules system."
"The most valuable feature is the scalability because it automatically scales up or scales down as per our requirements."
"The access instruction feature is the most valuable. This is what we use the most."
"The initial setup was very straightforward. Deployment took about ten minutes or less."
"The most valuable feature is that it is very easy to configure. It just takes a couple of minutes."
"The solution's initial setup process is easy."
"The ease of deployment of the product is valuable to me."
"It is Amazon. Everything is scalable. It is beyond what we need."
"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."
"There is room for improvement in pricing."
"Technical support for AWS WAF needs improvement."
"The solution should identify why it blocks particular websites."
"They should work to define more threats, add more security, and make it more compliant with more security companies."
"The solution could improve by having better rules, they are very basic at the moment. There are more attacks coming and we have to use third-party solutions, such as FIA. The features are not sufficient to prevent all the attacks, such as DDoS. Overall the solution should be more secure."
"The technical support does not respond to bugs in the coding of the product."
"The cost must be reduced."
"I would like to see the addition of more advanced rate-limiting features in the next release. It would be beneficial to extend rate limiting beyond just web servers to the main node level."
"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."
Earn 20 points
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews while Wallarm NG WAF is ranked 33rd in Web Application Firewall (WAF). AWS WAF is rated 8.0, while Wallarm NG WAF is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wallarm NG WAF writes "Active threat detection and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas Wallarm NG WAF is most compared with Salt Security, Noname Security, F5 Advanced WAF, Cloudflare and 42Crunch API Security Platform.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.