We performed a comparison between Imperva DDoS and Wallarm NG WAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."Imperva Incapsula has many valuable features. One, it protects the top 10 OWAS vulnerability, the open web application software platform, this is standard. Secondly, it protects against broken authentication. As well, it has remote execution of code."
"Its unique interface for managing security performance and ease of use are the most valuable features of this solution."
"On the site security, I can see which countries have incidents, whether it was a robot attack, a real human user, or non-human user."
"We use Imperva DDoS to stop DDoS attacks and reduce the amount of unwanted queries against web services or web scraping."
"We have peace of mind that nobody will use malware on us or try to hack our website."
"It fits our requirements, as well as our budget."
"Imperva DDoS is fairly stable, and its availability is quite high."
"The three-second service level agreement is already better than the competition."
"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."
"It would be beneficial to include vulnerability management in the solution, similar to what they have for their on-premise solution."
"A limited tool if you're looking to customize."
"We had an issue when securing the web applications for DDoS protection."
"The product could use a broader scope in the area of policies."
"The salespeople tend to exaggerate its capabilities, which can cost you money if you don't verify the information."
"There’s nothing that’s missing in terms of features."
"It's quite expensive."
"The log analytics interface within Incapsula isn't really good. For example, if you have to get all logs from there, it's a very cumbersome process."
"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."
Earn 20 points
Imperva DDoS is ranked 18th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 74 reviews while Wallarm NG WAF is ranked 33rd in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Imperva DDoS is rated 8.8, while Wallarm NG WAF is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Imperva DDoS writes "I like the content monitoring feature which I haven't seen in other WAF solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wallarm NG WAF writes "Active threat detection and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us". Imperva DDoS is most compared with Cloudflare, Akamai, Arbor DDoS, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF, whereas Wallarm NG WAF is most compared with Salt Security, Noname Security, AWS WAF and F5 Advanced WAF.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.