Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Imperva DDoS vs Wallarm NG WAF comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Wallarm NG WAF is praised for real-time threat detection, API protection, scalability, easy deployment, and detailed analytics.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Users desire better documentation, support responsiveness, fewer false positives, smoother integration, flexible pricing, and frequent updates for Wallarm NG WAF.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Users praise Wallarm NG WAF for its responsive, knowledgeable support, effective solutions, clear communication, and consistent customer service quality.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
<p>Wallarm NG WAF offers flexible, cost-effective subscription pricing with customizable options for scalable enterprise security needs.</p>
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Wallarm NG WAF efficiently scales to handle substantial traffic, integrates smoothly, and offers flexible cloud and on-premise deployment options.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Wallarm NG WAF is praised for stability, effective threat detection, seamless integration, robust scalability, and strong support.
 

Categories and Ranking

Imperva DDoS
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
21st
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
77
Ranking in other categories
CDN (7th), Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection (10th)
Wallarm NG WAF
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
35th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
API Security (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Imperva DDoS is 1.8%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wallarm NG WAF is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
 

Featured Reviews

DerrickAkankwasa - PeerSpot reviewer
Provide DDoS protection and better security at effective rate
It is expanding its number of data centers for scrubbing traffic. Currently, there is only one POP for cleaning in South Africa. They might add another POP in North Africa, possibly in Nigeria or Egypt. Latency concerns customers, especially in regions like East and West Africa, where traffic has to travel to South Africa before returning. Increasing the number of POPs across the continent would help address these latency issues and improve overall service. While the platform is already quite strong, there’s always room for improvement, especially in keeping up with emerging trends and new types of attacks. Enhancing security capabilities could be beneficial. Integrating more advanced AI features could significantly improve its effectiveness and help customers leverage these tools more effectively. It would be great to see more focus on AI integration to handle and analyze data more efficiently.
it_user662952 - PeerSpot reviewer
Active threat detection and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us.
I would say that the active threat detection feature and adaptive rules are the most valuable for us. With active threat detection, we are no longer over-swamped with tons of useless events. As all the payloads from malicious requests are analysed with a cloud scanner, we don’t need to do this manually. We also built up an incident management process when Wallarm confirmed that some of the attacks are exposing actual vulnerabilities. Adaptive security rules allowed us to use WAF in blocking mode which was almost impossible previously.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user68487 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 6, 2013
CloudFlare vs Incapsula: Web Application Firewall
CloudFlare vs Incapsula: Round 2 Web Application Firewall Comparative Penetration Testing Analysis Report v1.0 Summary This document contains the results of a second comparative penetration test conducted by a team of security specialists at Zero Science Lab against two cloud-based Web…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Real Estate/Law Firm
8%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Imperva Incapsula?
We use Imperva DDoS to stop DDoS attacks and reduce the amount of unwanted queries against web services or web scraping.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Imperva DDoS?
The pricing is rated a ten on a scale where ten is very expensive. The solution is only cloud-based and does not provide on-premises services.
What needs improvement with Imperva DDoS?
Pricing can be improved, as it is quite expensive. Additionally, support response times for emails can sometimes be delayed, which is an area that could use improvement.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Imperva Incapsula
Wallarm NG-WAF
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hitachi, BNZ, Bitstamp, Moz, InnoGames, BTCChina, Wix, LivePerson, Zillow and more.
Panasonic. Miro. Rappi. Wargaming. Gannett. Omio. Acronis. Workforce Software. Tipalti. SEMRush.
Find out what your peers are saying about Imperva DDoS vs. Wallarm NG WAF and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.