Windows Server Reviews

The most valuable feature of the solution is it works well overall.

I would like to see easier implementation and better customer service in the future.

I have beends using the solution for 20 years.

I have found the solution to be very reliable.

We have 18 people in our organization using the solution.

The customer service should be easier to access.

I was involved in the installation of the solution and it did go well. We have an HP Server and we are using Microsoft software, they clashed. It took months to get it to work well.

We used a consultant for the implementation and it took approximately six months to get everything working correctly.

We had to purchase the solution and also the licenses to go on each computer system.

We are going to continue using the solution until everything is on the cloud. I would not recommend it.

I rate Windows Server a five out of ten.

We use this solution for virtualization and the remote desktop.

We like the performance. 

We use this solution because we need Microsoft. It's not a choice about the other operating systems.

I have been using Windows Servers for approximately five years.

We are not yet using the latest version. We are using version 2016.

We have approximately 80 users in our company and we have a range of a couple of customers to 1,000 customers who are using this solution.

Technical support is okay.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward.

Depending on the size of the infrastructure, you need one single person single-handedly to four or five people to maintain this solution.

The price could be better and the licensing model could be easier to understand.

Our customers prefer lifetime licenses.

I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.

I would rate Windows Server an eight out of ten.

We're using it primarily for domain control, additional domains, and servers. Everything is used under the Windows platform.

I like that it's simple and the users are happy. 

It could be more secure. We can't compare it to other products because they have their own security and all those things. When it comes to email security, there are issues. Microsoft products used to get hacked all the time, but we're still comfortable with that.

I have been using Windows Server for almost ten years, and we're still using it.

It was a straightforward installation.

My four-member team of engineers can install and manage it themselves.

I would recommend this solution to potential users.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Windows Server a seven.

We use the solution as a typical server for our organization.

I have found the solution to be flexible and easy to use.

I believe the solution needs to be more secure in the future.

I have been using the solution for 10 years.

The solution has been stable.

The solution is scalable but not as much as some of their competitors. We have approximately 400 users using the solution in my organization.

The support is okay but it takes some time before you have someone on the telephone that is an expert that is needed for the issue.

I have previously used Linux and this solution is not as scalable.

The installation was straightforward.

The deployment is not a single-person job and we have used vendors in the past. For the deployment and maintenance of the solution, we have three technicians.

There is a license needed for this solution.

I would recommend using this solution to others.

I rate Windows Server an eight out of ten.

The solution is primarily used to deploy applications into the cloud and as remote information storage. Additionally, it is useful for test purposes. 

I find the solution to be easy to use, flexible with overall great performance.

The solution would be better by implementing more security and integration. 

Among some of the additional features, I would like to see in the next release are more integration and security.

I have used the solution for a few years.

The solution is stable. 

The solution is scalable. We have approximately 20 people using the solution. 

The installation was straightforward and took approximately one hour. 

I have deployed the solution by myself. 

The solution requires licencing. 

I will continue using and recommend the solution. 

I rate Windows Server an eight out of ten. 

We primarily use the solution as a database.

The product, overall, is very simple. It's easy to use and navigate. It's got a good design.

The implementation is very easy. It doesn't give you any trouble.

The stability is okay, however, it could be better. It's an area that they could improve on if they wanted to.

I've been using the solution for two years at this point.

The stability is somewhere in between good and bad. It's so-so. It could be better. 

We have 15 people that use the solution, and five engineers that manage everything as necessary.

We do plan to continue to use the product going forward.

I don't really need the assistance of technical support. I'm an engineer. Typically, I can fix any issues that may arise. Therefore, I don't contact Microsoft. I can't speak to their support service and how helpful they are.

We found the initial setup to be very simple and straightforward. It's not complex. We didn't have any issues.

I can't recall how long the actual deployment took. It was a while ago now.

I handled the installation by myself. You only really need one person to deploy the product.

We have engineers that can handle maintenance on the solution in our company.

I handled the implementation myself. I didn't need to have the installation done by a consultant or integrator.

We only really use Windows Server for one thing. We don't have too complicated of a setup.

I would recommend the solution to other organizations. I've mostly been happy with the product overall.

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten.

The solution is a general server, It can be used for any of the products that you want to create or use. For example, it can be used for application server deployment and web applications. It can be used for everything.

Nothing is required for the maintenance of the solution, Microsoft does everything. It is very good and robust.

The solution could be cheaper.

I have used the solution for 20 years

In my experience the solution is stable.

The solution is extremely scalable.

The support for this solution is excellent.

When comparing the installation to Linux and others, it is probably the best one.

The whole deployment with everything installed takes approximately one week. I have done the implementation of the solution for 10 years but now I use my team to do it. It normally only takes one person to do the deployment.

We pay yearly for a license. If you ask any vendor they will tell you that it could be cheaper.

I am going to continue to use this solution in the future.

I rate Windows Server an eight out of ten.

We use Windows Server as our certified server for compatibility.

It could be more compatible with other platforms.

The compatibility and the ease of use are areas that I would like to see improved.

We have been using Windows Server since 2016.

We are using the latest version.

It's a stable solution.

It's a scalable product. We have approximately 3,000 users in our organization.

We plan to continue to use this solution.

We have not contacted technical support.

The initial setup was straightforward. It was easy to install.

The deployment took three to six months.

We have a team of 50 admins for deployment and maintenance.

We had the help of a system integrator.

Definitely, I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.

I would rate Windows Server an eight out of ten.

We hosted servers on the solution. We installed programs and services on it such as Azure, an ERP product.

The solution is easy to use mostly but some features can be hard to understand for customers.

I have been using the solution for some time now and I have done so in the past year.

I would say Microsoft operating systems are more stable now than they were before, they have made some improvements over the years.

We have approximately 2000 users using the solution.

Windows server installation can be easy but it depends on what your needs are. If you built a huge platform, you can have some difficulties. On the other hand, if you use some simple build with, for example, services like IAS, it can be easily installed and you might be fine with the standard edition of Microsoft Server.

Microsoft has done a great job with Windows. Nothing is perfect, there is always going to be some issues with software at some point but when there are problems they are normally fixed easily. 

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Windows Server a seven out of ten.

We are using Windows Server locally for our DNS.

We are implementers, and we perform this service for our clients.

Our company is an ISP (Internet Service Provider). Windows Server is not directly used for internal purposes, but as our product for our external customers.

We chose Windows Server because it is easy to use, and easy to maintain.

The license model needs improvement. It would be better if the license had a longer lifetime.

This may be a feature that is already in place, but I like to see a monitoring feature for the desktop.

I have been using Windows Server for approximately three years.

It's a stable solution. Its stability is one of the reasons we decided to adopt Windows Server.

I have not yet experienced the scalability.

Technical support is pretty good.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward.

I recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.

I would rate Windows Server a seven out of ten.