Windows Server Reviews

I'm using the Windows Server to manage all the printers and all the additional hardware. I have a mini virtual server. We are customers of Windows and I'm a network system administrator.

The solution is very easy to configure.

I'd like an improvement in being able to separate all the services offered. 

I've been using this solution for seven years. 

I have some technical assistance if I need it, but it's not through Windows. 

The initial setup is very easy. You connect to the internet and it's easy. 

I rate this solution a seven out of 10. 

We are using the solution as a web server.

The most valuable feature is the performance.

The solution could improve by increasing security.

I have been using this solution for a few years.

Microsoft Server is a reliable solution.

There are a few people using this solution in my organization.

The technical support from Microsoft is good.

The installation is easy and it took me approximately 30 minutes.

I did the implementation myself.

I would recommend this solution.

I rate Windows Server a seven out of ten.

We're using it primarily for domain control, additional domains, and servers. Everything is used under the Windows platform.

I like that it's simple and the users are happy. 

It could be more secure. We can't compare it to other products because they have their own security and all those things. When it comes to email security, there are issues. Microsoft products used to get hacked all the time, but we're still comfortable with that.

I have been using Windows Server for almost ten years, and we're still using it.

It was a straightforward installation.

My four-member team of engineers can install and manage it themselves.

I would recommend this solution to potential users.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Windows Server a seven.

The solution can be used for remote access through the remote desktop.

The main feature of the solution is it has a graphical interface.

I have been using the solution for approximately five years.

The stability is not very good because you have to restart the system to keep the stability.

The solution is scalable.

The installation is very easy and the installation takes approximately 20 minutes.

I can do the implementation of the solution myself.

The price of the solution could be reduced and there is a license required.

I would recommend Windows Server if they are not able to use Linux.

I rate Windows Server a seven out of ten.

The solution is a general server, It can be used for any of the products that you want to create or use. For example, it can be used for application server deployment and web applications. It can be used for everything.

Nothing is required for the maintenance of the solution, Microsoft does everything. It is very good and robust.

The solution could be cheaper.

I have used the solution for 20 years

In my experience the solution is stable.

The solution is extremely scalable.

The support for this solution is excellent.

When comparing the installation to Linux and others, it is probably the best one.

The whole deployment with everything installed takes approximately one week. I have done the implementation of the solution for 10 years but now I use my team to do it. It normally only takes one person to do the deployment.

We pay yearly for a license. If you ask any vendor they will tell you that it could be cheaper.

I am going to continue to use this solution in the future.

I rate Windows Server an eight out of ten.

We are using Windows Server as a cloud server.

I have found Windows Server to be easy to use and the performance to be good.

I have been using Windows Server for many years.

The stability of the Windows Server has been good.

We have been using the same Windows Server release for years, we haven't needed to buy another one.

We use Windows Server primarily as a file server and as a mail server and has been working well with 20 users.

We do our own technical support within the company.

The implementation process for Windows Server was fine, we did not have any problems. It took us less than a day to complete the implementation.

We have a team that handles the implementation.

The price of the solution should be less expensive. There is an annual subscription to use the solution.

The solution has fulfilled its requirements.

There are many operating systems that people can use, such as Linux and Windows Server. They all work well for their purpose.

I rate Windows Server a six out of ten.

What I like most about Windows Server is that it's easy to use.

I would like to see better performance and more integration options in the next release of Windows Server. 

I've been using Windows Server for quite a while now. I'm not sure how long.

Windows Server is stable.

I would rate Windows support five out of 10. 

Installing Windows Server is pretty straightforward. You don't really need much IT knowledge to deploy it.

We pay for a yearly license

I would rate Windows Server five out of 10. I would recommend it to others. 

We used Windows Server to run SQL applications and a few remote desktop applications.

The solution is easy to use.

I have been using Windows Server for approximately four years.

The solution is stable.

Windows Server is scalable.

We have approximately 20 people in my organization using this solution.

Windows Server is easy to configure. However, it takes approximately three months for the full implementation.

We used integrators to do the implementation of the solution. We have one technician that works on the solution.

Windows Server's whole licensing model is complex because if you have, for example, Microsoft Office and end-user applications installed on a server with a remote desktop, then the licensing can be complex. If the model could be simplified it would be better.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Windows Server an eight out of ten.