Windows Server Reviews

We use the solution for managing data base applications for client monitoring.

The solution could be more secure.

My company has been using Windows Server for ten years.

I feel the solution to be stable. 

The scalability is commensurate with what we are willing to pay for. 

We have not had experience with technical support. As we are in Indonesia, the fact that our application must follow the operating system can be problematic. 

We have an IT team which handles installation. I take care of the business aspects when it comes to customer relations. 

I do not recall how long installation took. 

We feel Windows Server to be very powerful and are not aware of solutions which can act as its replacement. 

We are an IT company and make both internal and external use of the solution, which we do as an integrator. 

We have a remote client boarder and they claim that replication is difficult. 

There are 1,500 users making use of the solution in my company. 

I would rate Windows Server as a six or six-point-five out of ten. 

We use Windows Server for hosting web pages, our SQL databases, and other things.

The interface is easy to use.

We had some complaints about the initial setup.

We have been using Windows Server for a couple of years.

This is a stable product.

We have approximately 600 users and there are two engineers responsible for management.

I have no direct experience with Microsoft technical support.

We do not have any Linux-based systems.

This is a normal installation and the initial setup is of average complexity.

It did not take too long to install, although we had some complaints while doing it.

I installed it myself.

Licensing fees are paid on an annual basis, and the price could be improved.

Overall, this is a good product and I recommend it.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We use the solution as a server for our information at our company.

The most valuable features I have found to be the flexibility and wide range of support training available.

In the future, there should be better protection for this solution.

I have been using the solution for approximately 20 years.

The solution is stable. However, you can receive a lot of cyberattacks. We need to invest more in security when we are using Windows. It tends to be the target of attacks and hacks compared to other operating systems, such as Linux. 

We have approximately 400 users using the solution in my organization.

We used Ubuntu Linux previously.

The installation of the solution is easy. The time depends on what you are going to configure on the server. The install itself can be done in approximately 10 minutes.

We did the implementation ourselves and we use a team of two developers and three administrators for maintenance.

I would recommend this solution. However, I would advise investing in more security measures. We plan to continue using the solution in the future.

I rate Windows Server a seven out of ten.

We are using Windows Server locally for our DNS.

We are implementers, and we perform this service for our clients.

Our company is an ISP (Internet Service Provider). Windows Server is not directly used for internal purposes, but as our product for our external customers.

We chose Windows Server because it is easy to use, and easy to maintain.

The license model needs improvement. It would be better if the license had a longer lifetime.

This may be a feature that is already in place, but I like to see a monitoring feature for the desktop.

I have been using Windows Server for approximately three years.

It's a stable solution. Its stability is one of the reasons we decided to adopt Windows Server.

I have not yet experienced the scalability.

Technical support is pretty good.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward.

I recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.

I would rate Windows Server a seven out of ten.

We use Windows Server for sharing files and running applications, for example, Microsoft Exchange for correspondence.

The solution could improve by being more user-friendly.

I have been using Windows Server for approximately three months.

The newer version of this solution is highly stable.

The solution is scalable.

We have approximately 50 users using the solution.

I have not needed to use the support.

We use Ubuntu Linux for some servers.

The solution is straightforward to install and took approximately 30 minutes.

Our IT department did the implementation of the solution. We have a team of engineers and administrators that do the implementation and maintenance.

I recommend this solution to others.

I rate Windows Server an eight out of ten.

We use this solution for virtualization and the remote desktop.

We like the performance. 

We use this solution because we need Microsoft. It's not a choice about the other operating systems.

I have been using Windows Servers for approximately five years.

We are not yet using the latest version. We are using version 2016.

We have approximately 80 users in our company and we have a range of a couple of customers to 1,000 customers who are using this solution.

Technical support is okay.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward.

Depending on the size of the infrastructure, you need one single person single-handedly to four or five people to maintain this solution.

The price could be better and the licensing model could be easier to understand.

Our customers prefer lifetime licenses.

I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.

I would rate Windows Server an eight out of ten.

We use this solution for common management and group policy management. Within our organization, there are between 300 to 400 people using this solution and we intend to expand and continue using Windows Server in the future.

The user interface could be simplified. Sometimes I feel like there are too many things going on at once. It should be easier to navigate and find the functions that I am trying to implement. 

I have been using this solution for roughly 20 years.

Windows Server is reasonably stable.

The technical support is okay. Sometimes Microsoft cannot answer our questions quickly or precisely. There are times when we need to trouble-shoot on our own.

The initial setup was straightforward. We had it fully installed within one or two hours.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of eight.

We primarily use Windows Server for Citrix desktops and domain controllers.

The domain controller features are useful.

The price should be reduced.

I have been using Windows Server for 10 years.

Windows server is a stable product and we will continue to use it.

Scalability has not been a problem. In one of the jobs I was doing, there were 700 users.

I have never had to log a case with Microsoft so I don't have any experience with technical support.

I have always used just only Windows.

The installation is straightforward and it takes about 20 minutes to deploy.

It is a manual installation and I handle the deployment myself.

The licensing fees are expensive.

This is a product that I can recommend.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.