Windows Server Reviews

We are using Windows Server as a cloud server.

I have found Windows Server to be easy to use and the performance to be good.

I have been using Windows Server for many years.

The stability of the Windows Server has been good.

We have been using the same Windows Server release for years, we haven't needed to buy another one.

We use Windows Server primarily as a file server and as a mail server and has been working well with 20 users.

We do our own technical support within the company.

The implementation process for Windows Server was fine, we did not have any problems. It took us less than a day to complete the implementation.

We have a team that handles the implementation.

The price of the solution should be less expensive. There is an annual subscription to use the solution.

The solution has fulfilled its requirements.

There are many operating systems that people can use, such as Linux and Windows Server. They all work well for their purpose.

I rate Windows Server a six out of ten.

On-premises

We used Windows Server to run SQL applications and a few remote desktop applications.

The solution is easy to use.

I have been using Windows Server for approximately four years.

The solution is stable.

Windows Server is scalable.

We have approximately 20 people in my organization using this solution.

Windows Server is easy to configure. However, it takes approximately three months for the full implementation.

We used integrators to do the implementation of the solution. We have one technician that works on the solution.

Windows Server's whole licensing model is complex because if you have, for example, Microsoft Office and end-user applications installed on a server with a remote desktop, then the licensing can be complex. If the model could be simplified it would be better.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Windows Server an eight out of ten.

We use this solution for hosting applications on the server. 

The on premises to cloud migration should be easier. 

I have used this solution for ten years. 

This is a stable solution. 

This is a scalable solution. 

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. 

In my organization, we use Windows Server both for our own company purposes and for our customers who use our software products. We are based in India, and most of our enterprise customers use Windows Server.

Network configuration and management in Windows Server is very easy, providing fast deployment, plug and play capability, and simplified partition creation. This ease is crucial for us as we operate in analytical sciences with multiple laboratories. Additionally, backup work is facilitated by our own backup deployment managers, enhancing our management capabilities.

An area of improvement in Windows Server is the diagnostics of network drops, especially in a cloud environment. The current diagnostic logs have not seen much improvement in the last ten years and aren't very helpful in addressing network-related issues specific to individual customer locations.

I have several years of experience with Windows Server, possibly even decades.

The initial setup of Windows Server was complex. We deployed it on Azure, and the process took approximately one to two days at most.

Windows Server is very stable, and I would rate its stability at nine out of ten.

Windows Server offers high scalability. I would rate its scalability at eight point five out of ten.

The technical support for Windows Server is of very high quality. I would rate it at nine point five out of ten.

Positive

My team and I have been dependent on Windows Server for several years and have never used any other solutions.

The initial setup of Windows Server was complex.

We handled the deployment ourselves in-house for both our internal requirements and our customers'. If a customer's workflow restricts us, we request them to deploy their own team or use a third-party team.

We calculate ROIs for several solutions, including Windows Server, and propose the results to our customers to convince them why they should upgrade. Our company manufactures both hardware and software, and we use our previous experiences for these calculations to maximize the utilization of resources available.

The price of Windows Server is high, with significant costs for maintenance, initial deployment, and hardware. These high costs can limit expansion for organizations unable to afford it, but those with the means can benefit from its scalability.

I went straight with Windows Server without evaluating other options.

Overall, I rate Windows Server as nine out of ten. It is one of the best solutions available globally. I recommend Windows Server to others.

Public Cloud

Microsoft Azure