Windows Server Reviews

We use Windows Server for hosting web pages, our SQL databases, and other things.

The interface is easy to use.

We had some complaints about the initial setup.

We have been using Windows Server for a couple of years.

This is a stable product.

We have approximately 600 users and there are two engineers responsible for management.

I have no direct experience with Microsoft technical support.

We do not have any Linux-based systems.

This is a normal installation and the initial setup is of average complexity.

It did not take too long to install, although we had some complaints while doing it.

I installed it myself.

Licensing fees are paid on an annual basis, and the price could be improved.

Overall, this is a good product and I recommend it.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We are using Windows Server locally for our DNS.

We are implementers, and we perform this service for our clients.

Our company is an ISP (Internet Service Provider). Windows Server is not directly used for internal purposes, but as our product for our external customers.

We chose Windows Server because it is easy to use, and easy to maintain.

The license model needs improvement. It would be better if the license had a longer lifetime.

This may be a feature that is already in place, but I like to see a monitoring feature for the desktop.

I have been using Windows Server for approximately three years.

It's a stable solution. Its stability is one of the reasons we decided to adopt Windows Server.

I have not yet experienced the scalability.

Technical support is pretty good.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward.

I recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.

I would rate Windows Server a seven out of ten.

We are in the waste logistics industry and we are using this product as the central server for our file systems. The SQL server is running on top of this.

Windows Server could be more secure.

We have been using Windows Server for six or seven years.

This is quite a stable product.

Windows Server is scalable and we have six users in the company. We plan to increase our usage in the future.

I don't have any experience with technical support.

I did not use another similar product before this one.

The installation is quite straightforward.

We completed the deployment ourselves.

I was responsible for the deployment and also handle maintenance.

This is not an expensive product.

I can recommend Windows Server.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

We primarily use Windows Server for Citrix desktops and domain controllers.

The domain controller features are useful.

The price should be reduced.

I have been using Windows Server for 10 years.

Windows server is a stable product and we will continue to use it.

Scalability has not been a problem. In one of the jobs I was doing, there were 700 users.

I have never had to log a case with Microsoft so I don't have any experience with technical support.

I have always used just only Windows.

The installation is straightforward and it takes about 20 minutes to deploy.

It is a manual installation and I handle the deployment myself.

The licensing fees are expensive.

This is a product that I can recommend.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

I use Windows Server for applications.

I like that Windows Server is easy to use.

It would be better if they improved the user interface.

I have been using Windows Server for a few years. 

Windows Server is a stable solution.

The initial setup is straightforward.

It's easy for me to install or set up the Windows Server, but I have some technicians who do it.

There is a license for Windows Server, but we have got the license from a local supplier,
Black Neuron Technology. They also provide tech support locally.

I would recommend this solution to potential users.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Windows Server a nine.

The solution can be used for remote access through the remote desktop.

The main feature of the solution is it has a graphical interface.

I have been using the solution for approximately five years.

The stability is not very good because you have to restart the system to keep the stability.

The solution is scalable.

The installation is very easy and the installation takes approximately 20 minutes.

I can do the implementation of the solution myself.

The price of the solution could be reduced and there is a license required.

I would recommend Windows Server if they are not able to use Linux.

I rate Windows Server a seven out of ten.

I am using this solution for a databases server running Azure.

The solution is not easy to use and could be simplified. Additionally, the solution could have better integration.

I have been using this solution within the last 12 months.

The solution is stable.

The scalability has been fine for what we have been using it for. However, we have not fully utilized scalability.

We have approximately 100 users using this solution in my organization.

The installation is easy.

You do not need a vendor or consultant to do the implementation.

I would recommend this solution.

I rate Windows Server a seven out of ten.

I use this solution for running applications that my clients use.

The solution is user-friendly, the UI looks good, and there are new versions every year. Each new version is very different, better, and cleaner.

I have been using the solution for five years.

We have not had an issue with the stability of this solution. However, there could be some improvements.

The scalability is good.

I was satisfied with the technical support from Microsoft.

The installation is very easy.

I did the implementation of the solution.

I rate Windows Server a nine out of ten.