Windows Server Reviews

Windows Server is easy to use. It's user-friendly for the admin guys.

Windows should add some more compatibility tools to Windows Server.

We've been using Windows Server ever since it was first released. 

Windows Server is quite stable.

We haven't had any issues with Microsoft support thus far. 

Installing Windows Server is quite easy. I'm not exactly sure how long it takes to deploy. My team does that. We have a team of two to three Windows admin guys who manage the solution.

I rate Windows Server nine out of 10. I would recommend it to others.

We use Windows Server for applications, data storage, and communication.

Windows Server is easy to use.

The solution could improve by being more user-friendly.

I have been using Windows Server for approximately three years.

The solution is stable.

We have not had any scalability issues.

We had approximately three customers last year.

The technical support has been good.

The installation is straightforward.

We have a team that does the implementation and maintenance of the solution. We have recently done smaller implementations only requiring one manager and a few technicians as support.

Our customers had a bundle package with Microsoft that included Windows Server.

I rate Windows Server an eight out of ten.

We use this solution to run several personal applications and enterprise applications.

The performance is good.

Windows Server could be more user-friendly.

I have been using Windows Server for more than 10 years.

We have used several different versions starting from 2008 to 2020.

It is a stable solution.

Window Server is a scalable solution.

All of the users in our organization are using Windows Server.

We have no issues with the technical support.

There is no improvement needed with the Microsoft technical support.

I have not used any other solutions.

I was not involved in the installation of the Windows Server.

We need one or two team members to deploy and maintain this solution.

With my experience, I would definitely recommend this solution.

From a performance perspective, I would rate Windows Server a nine out of ten.

Because I have only used Windows Server, I can't give you a comparison with other solutions such as Linus or Unix.

I am using this solution for a databases server running Azure.

The solution is not easy to use and could be simplified. Additionally, the solution could have better integration.

I have been using this solution within the last 12 months.

The solution is stable.

The scalability has been fine for what we have been using it for. However, we have not fully utilized scalability.

We have approximately 100 users using this solution in my organization.

The installation is easy.

You do not need a vendor or consultant to do the implementation.

I would recommend this solution.

I rate Windows Server a seven out of ten.

I mainly use this solution for running applications.

An improvement would be to have more dashboards.

I've been using this solution for over fifteen years.

Windows server is stable, having improved on previous versions.

I would rate this solution as eight out of ten.

We use it to deploy any product.

It is stable, scalable, flexible, and easy to use.

The integration and monitoring could be improved.

I've been using it for a couple of months.

It is stable.

It is scalable.

The initial setup was easy and took about half an hour.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Windows Server at eight.

We use it for the operating system.

I like its simplicity. 

It would be better if they had more security features and fewer bugs. They can also improve their technical support.

I have been working with Windows Server for about ten years.

Windows Server is a stable solution.

Windows Server is scalable.

Technical support isn't very good. I would rate it somewhere in the middle.

The initial setup was straightforward.

It could be cheaper. 

I would tell potential users that it depends on the solution and the setup. If it's related to security, maybe it's better to go for Linux. If they're looking for usage and administration, they can go for Windows.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Windows Server a seven.

Our primary use case for Windows Server is to support applications and distribute them to all the company users.

The solution is invaluable, we need it for file and emails servers.

The solution has plenty of features.

I have been using Windows Server 

The solution is highly stable.

Windows Server is highly scalable.

The technical support could improve.

I have used Windows 10. If you compare Windows 10 to Windows Server they are very different. The Windows Server is supporting all the company users. While Windows 10 is a personal operating system.

The setup is very easy.

The price of the solution could improve.

I would recommend this solution to others, it can implement easily, it is very stable and reliable.

I rate Windows Server a ten out of ten.