There should be an intuitive end-user interface in JD Edwards World where users can autonomously manage their tasks. For instance, if they wish to design their workflows, they shouldn't rely on the technical team. Similarly, if they aim to launch a product, they shouldn't need technical assistance. The responsibility should lie with the sales team to strategize, execute, and launch products to meet business needs. It integrate perfectly with your existing infrastructure. I recommend the solution. Overall, I rate the solution a five out of ten.
Sr Manager - Delivery Head (ANZ & South Africa) at Cigniti Technologies
Real User
Top 20
2024-03-29T04:35:00Z
Mar 29, 2024
Integrating JD Edwards World was straightforward, especially through the Google Cloud layer. We primarily use API-based integrations and appreciate the ease of integrating with various systems. I would recommend JD Edwards World to other users based on our positive experience. We have already recommended it to at least two other collaborators. Overall, I would rate JD Edwards World as a nine out of ten.
I rate JD Edwards World a ten out of ten. If they are new and implementing the solution, they must prepare the document and process and have key users, process owners, and a dedicated team available for system implementation.
I started working with JD Edwards World 7.3. I worked with 9.1 and then now EnterpriseOne. It's difficult to compare this solution to the modern ERP solutions out there. It's very dated. I wouldn't recommend it to others as it is out of date. I'd rate it six out of ten.
I wouldn't go with World anymore since it's going to be out of support in the next year three years. That's out of the question. Nobody's going to implement it at this point. If you are a big company and willing to spend millions of dollars, SAP could be an option. That said, eventually, Enterprise One will be offering the same functionality as SAP - and at a lower cost. I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.
Head of IT at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2022-02-15T15:15:47Z
Feb 15, 2022
We are a customer and an end-user. I'd advise potential new users to understand better the requirements and check how their other applications can connect with the ERP before starting out. I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten.
I would rate JDE World and eight out of ten. I would like to see performance monitoring improve. Since I have experience with SAP, I know they have some program to monitor the performance, they can know what the current CPU is and what the program status is. But in JDE, I don't know whether they have enough programs to do the monitoring for the performance. I would recommend EnterpriseOne over World. I have done a comparison between JDE, SAP, and EPS, I think JDE is the best amongst these three ERPs. I'm in China and JDE has very few customers here. I think the root cause is the cost strategy. Their sales strategy is wrong.
Oracle's JD Edwards World single platform solution enables better collaboration both within and outside your business network. Get all of your lines of business working together sharing information, boosting performance, trimming costs, and driving profitable growth. ERP Suite.
There should be an intuitive end-user interface in JD Edwards World where users can autonomously manage their tasks. For instance, if they wish to design their workflows, they shouldn't rely on the technical team. Similarly, if they aim to launch a product, they shouldn't need technical assistance. The responsibility should lie with the sales team to strategize, execute, and launch products to meet business needs. It integrate perfectly with your existing infrastructure. I recommend the solution. Overall, I rate the solution a five out of ten.
Integrating JD Edwards World was straightforward, especially through the Google Cloud layer. We primarily use API-based integrations and appreciate the ease of integrating with various systems. I would recommend JD Edwards World to other users based on our positive experience. We have already recommended it to at least two other collaborators. Overall, I would rate JD Edwards World as a nine out of ten.
Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
I rate JD Edwards World a ten out of ten. If they are new and implementing the solution, they must prepare the document and process and have key users, process owners, and a dedicated team available for system implementation.
I started working with JD Edwards World 7.3. I worked with 9.1 and then now EnterpriseOne. It's difficult to compare this solution to the modern ERP solutions out there. It's very dated. I wouldn't recommend it to others as it is out of date. I'd rate it six out of ten.
If I were implementing JD Edwards World today, it would be version 9.2. My rating for JD Edwards World is nine out of ten.
I wouldn't go with World anymore since it's going to be out of support in the next year three years. That's out of the question. Nobody's going to implement it at this point. If you are a big company and willing to spend millions of dollars, SAP could be an option. That said, eventually, Enterprise One will be offering the same functionality as SAP - and at a lower cost. I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.
I am satisfied with the solution overall, and I would recommend it to others. I rate JD Edwards World a seven out of ten.
We are a customer and an end-user. I'd advise potential new users to understand better the requirements and check how their other applications can connect with the ERP before starting out. I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten.
I would rate JDE World and eight out of ten. I would like to see performance monitoring improve. Since I have experience with SAP, I know they have some program to monitor the performance, they can know what the current CPU is and what the program status is. But in JDE, I don't know whether they have enough programs to do the monitoring for the performance. I would recommend EnterpriseOne over World. I have done a comparison between JDE, SAP, and EPS, I think JDE is the best amongst these three ERPs. I'm in China and JDE has very few customers here. I think the root cause is the cost strategy. Their sales strategy is wrong.