What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Azure?

I would rate it an eight out of ten. There are a lot of benefits. The integration options for all services are great.

Code breaks from time to time, so maintenance is required periodically, especially for extensive codebases. Regular testing and checks are necessary to ensure reliability and performance. I use other tools that integrate Copilot, which will soon be integrated into Microsoft Azure. I rely on other sources when I need to find information. There's also the security issue, as there's always a risk concerning where company data will ultimately be stored. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We are currently evaluating how to maximize the use of services to back up our database. Microsoft Azure is a cloud-based solution. I would recommend Microsoft Azure to other users because it has many services that will benefit companies. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

In Kubernetes, what we are using offers different features, which is good. We are enabling more drivers and integrations, which is beneficial. Regarding virtual machines, they also perform very well. We are using cognitive services include the Face API. We have built a comprehensive AI search feature, specifically Cognitive Search, and implemented it in our application. If a product is supposed to include certain features, it performs as expected. The support team ensures it is a reliable product, without parts that don't work. Products are thoroughly tested to ensure quality. However, in Azure, maintaining new products can be challenging and requires significant work. AWS fixes these issues more efficiently. Some startups choose Azure because they may not have much funding. These startups find Azure services beneficial and cost-effective. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I recommend the solution to use it. This solution is cost-effective, with high uptime and zero downtime.

Most people use Azure Synapse for data onboarding and integration. Synapse is a big data analytics platform where data engineers and scientists can collaborate on a unified platform. Another service called API Management serves data outside Azure to downstream consumers or third parties. This is useful for cases where third parties can't be onboarded onto your system due to compliance or regulatory issues or need a specific slice of your data in near real-time. When we used Cosmos DB, we hosted near real-time data with a latency of about 15 minutes and served it via API M. With API M, authentication tokens were shared with the end users, allowing us to know precisely who was consuming data outside of our Azure environment. This setup was unique because it required providing near real-time information with minimal latency, even as the number of concurrent users increased. Cosmos DB worked well in this scenario due to its horizontal scalability. We also hosted similar data on Azure SQL, as Cosmos DB can be more expensive for cases where a smaller amount of data needed to be served, such as just the last one to three months of data. Azure SQL was a good alternative. The same API M interface was used to serve data from Cosmos DB and Azure SQL. Under the hood, one API would fetch data from Cosmos DB, and another would pull from Azure SQL. This architecture was tested and worked well for our client. It was easy to maintain. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten,

I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

Microsoft Azure has been a crucial component of our operations, and its continuous improvements in AI and security are promising. Staying updated with Azure’s developments through official announcements and industry news is vital for leveraging its full potential. I rate it a ten.

I would recommend using this solution. Internally, we've always preferred it over Cloud Foundry. Here's why: Microsoft Azure has been a much more seamless experience. For example, Cloud Foundry isn't very scalable. It can't handle parallel computation well, and it frequently hangs. Plus, it's not very user-friendly as a platform. So, for all those reasons, I would recommend Azure. It's highly scalable, supports parallel computation, and offers all the steps needed for a product lifecycle within one platform. That eliminates the need for separate storage, deployment, and production environments – everything's available from the start. Those are the key reasons for my recommendation. Overall, I would rate the solution as eight out of ten because there are still areas for improvement, like integration with cross-platform.

We use management tools for APIs. A few people were involved in the solution’s deployment and maintenance. I would recommend the solution to other users. Overall, I rate Microsoft Azure a nine out of ten.

I would advise that migrating to the cloud is an amazing opportunity. However, it's crucial to understand the drivers of the cloud, what changes it brings, and to reconsider the organization and skills within the organization. If you expect to move to the cloud without changing the structure, processes, personnel, or without providing training, it won't work. You might end up disappointed, wanting a direct copy of what you had in a cloud environment in the past, which could be more expensive. Moving to Azure requires training your IT teams, but also providing basic cloud training for everyone, including the CFO, CIO, and even the CEO. Everyone needs to understand the concept of the cloud and what can be achieved with it. Creating a cloud center of excellence is also critical to reshaping the company with cloud capabilities. This can lead to significant changes and transformation, increasing elasticity, reactivity, and potentially huge savings. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.

The website is straightforward to configure, and also very quick to update. In other words, I can update a website even from my development tool, Visual Studio Code. I use Visual Studio Code in my company to develop websites and also to deploy the websites from Visual Studio Code. So, that makes Azure completely above what I've experienced with Amazon Web Services. Microsoft Azure is deployed on the cloud in our organization. One to five people with knowledge of Microsoft Azure, Visual Studio Code, and domain hosting are needed for the solution's deployment and maintenance. I would recommend the solution to other users. Users need to understand what they want to deploy and what cloud services they need to use because there are different trends in each one of these cloud services. Users can go multi-cloud as well. Microsoft Azure helps save infrastructure, staff, time, and insurance. You'll save a lot on ISO certification. I had a client who wanted a solution that would have required the client to be ISO-certified to manage the privacy or guarantee the privacy and security of data. Overall, I rate Microsoft Azure an eight out of ten.

The tool is a great product to use, and very intuitive. It is beneficial for users and enterprises. I rate it an eight out of ten. The product is easy to learn, but it may become difficult depending on your technical ability.

I would recommend Azure based on specific business needs. However, I would recommend using this solution. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten because of the customer support issues.

We are not allowed to store data in Azure. Our data is encrypted via third-party software. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

We've been leveraging Microsoft products on the Microsoft platform for the past 20 years. We are dedicated to Microsoft products and platforms. We no longer need someone to take care of the physical servers on our end. Many server administrations have been drastically reduced. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I rate the solution’s ability to support our client’s business growth a seven out of ten. We don't get direct support from Microsoft. I rate Azure's integration capabilities a seven out of ten. I will recommend the tool to others. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

I rate the product an eight out of ten.

I would rate Azure an eight out of ten for managed services and IaaS a seven out of ten. While I can advise, many factors influence decision-making. For example, if we invest in a ten-million-dollar data center capacity improvement, we need to see the return on investment within a one to three-year timeframe. If not profitable, such a large investment wouldn't be justifiable. Alternatively, customers could sign a five-year contract guaranteeing capacity usage and payment if we invest in the upgrade. These are the parameters that define decision-making in such situations.

We are partners. We pitch Microsoft products to our clients whenever there is a need. I will recommend the product to others. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

Azure supports the development and hosting of various applications, including those built with ASP.NET. We have developed an application using ASP.NET versions 4, 6, and 7, and then deployed it to Azure for hosting. Data analytics is one of the efficient features as well. The features I find most useful for cloud computing needs, particularly for fax services, include Azure RPA (Robotic Process Automation), Azure Logic App, and Azure Service Bus. We can easily integrate the product with MS SQL Server and Azure SQL Database as a service. Further, we can utilize event apps within the IT infrastructure. I have experienced significant benefits from Azure's security and compliance tools, particularly in the area of identity management. Working with Microsoft Identity, including Azure Active Directory (Azure AD), has proven valuable for operations involving customer-to-customer (CTC), business-to-customer (BTC), and business-to-business (B2B) scenarios. The customization capabilities help us with the registration of applications under Azure Active Directory, enabling robust authentication and authorization mechanisms. I recommend the product for small companies or startups. It is also a good option for established companies planning to reach beyond certain limitations in terms of business. I rate it a seven out of ten.

Microsoft Azure is deployed on the cloud in our organization. Overall, I rate the solution a seven or eight out of ten.

We utilize Azure for disaster recovery and business continuity, particularly for our graph database application. While our primary system is hosted on AWS, we have implemented a backup and disaster recovery strategy using Azure. In the event of any disruptions or failures, Azure serves as a reliable fallback, ensuring minimal downtime and data loss. While we don't create workflows directly in Azure, we benefit from its auto-scaling feature, which adjusts resources based on demand. Plus, Azure integrates well with tools like Control M for workflow automation, making our processes more efficient. Integrating Azure with other Microsoft solutions like Active Directory and Office 365 is seamless and straightforward, enhancing our business processes. However, we also need to integrate Azure with external systems like Jira and GitLab. While Azure excels in Microsoft product integration, we are exploring ways to streamline integration with non-Microsoft products, which is an area where Microsoft can improve. For those considering Azure, it is crucial to understand that Microsoft offers a comprehensive ecosystem of products and services. Azure is a top choice for cloud computing needs, especially when already using Microsoft products. It seamlessly integrates with other Microsoft solutions, providing a cohesive experience. So, if you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem, Azure is worth considering for your cloud computing needs. Overall, I would rate Microsoft Azure as a seven out of ten.

The projects or workload that have been migrated to Microsoft Azure in my company is an area that is managed by a different team since I work as an accounts manager. My job role is just to get the business for our company. Once I get the business for my company, I submit the details to the technical or delivery team, which takes care of the business part. The feature of the product that has been most impactful for our company's operations stems from the fact that everything is on a single dashboard. In general, everything is on a single dashboard or a single page where users can monitor and manage everything related to the product. The product's scalability benefited our company's business needs since we can upgrade it or scale up to meet our needs. The knowledge related to the integration capabilities of Microsoft Azure with the existing products in my company's infrastructure lies with the technical team in my organization. I rate the overall tool an eight out of ten.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Microsoft Azure is a cloud-based solution. I would recommend Microsoft Azure to other users. The solution's availability is vast. Centers in India have regulatory requirements to keep the data within India, and Microsoft Azure helps us mitigate those regulatory requirements. The solution's support is very good, and it helps meet the business requirements. Overall, I rate Microsoft Azure an eight out of ten.

I really like the solution. Overall, I rate the tool a ten out of ten.

Microsoft Azure is deployed on the cloud. I would recommend Microsoft Azure to other users, but they should have a strong system integrator or someone working with Microsoft to assist. The strength would lie with the organization deploying the solution; they have to be on par to understand better what is happening. Overall, I rate Microsoft Azure a seven out of ten.

We are into data management. We do a lot of data consumption and data validation. We need a lot of virtual solutions and storage solutions to process data. I would recommend the solution to others. Overall, I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Microsoft Azure provides a reliable cloud platform and comprehensive services so it would be a great choice for first-time users. I am rating it eight out of ten.

I can recommend it to other people who want to start using it. So, our company provides a lot of solutions to our clients, including backup solutions like NAS storage, cloud storage, and servers. Parallely, we provide support to users. I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten.

It's a good product and the correct choice. I would rate Microsoft Azure a nine out of ten.

I would recommend the suite. In our company, we use the Microsoft suite, which includes Outlook, SharePoint, and OneDrive. I believe that Microsoft offers a very good product. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I would recommend this solution to others. I rate Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse an eight out of ten.

I highly recommend this solution to any prospective buyer. If you are using other Microsoft applications like Microsoft 365, Power BI, Data Factory, or Azure Migrate, you will definitely find it useful. Azure is fully integrated with other Microsoft applications, as well, including Microsoft Office, Microsoft Project, and Microsoft SQL Server. Microsoft Azure is an all-in-one solution. We are feeling very secure hosting our application on Microsoft Azure because Microsoft is a global giant and provides excellent solutions and services.

My advice to first-time users of Microsoft Azure would be for them to go through certification training. This way they would be able to understand what they are doing. Without certification, it would be difficult to understand how the system is working. I rate Microsoft Azure a nine out of ten.

All the cloud service providers(CSP) are more or less have the same services. The use case for the cloud would need the sustainment of tiering storage. We don't see a big discrepancy when it comes to Microsoft Azure, but there are pros and cons. I rate Microsoft Azure a seven out of ten.

We implement the solution. We are silver resellers. We are using the latest version of the solution. I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten.

My advice to others is you need to be technically aware of Azure services, which are always in some kind of improvement. It is helpful to be aware of the possibility and functionality of your projects and the financial cost for Azure services in the project plan. I rate Microsoft Azure a nine out of ten.

We've been using different Microsoft solutions. Microsoft has solutions. It starts from Azure data sending, data storage, and other Azure related solutions. other Microsoft solutions that everybody uses include Office, Outlook, C#, .Net, etc., from the technical side. It is our customers who use Microsoft Azure. They wanted to move to Microsoft Azure, so we moved them. We just maintain it for them, and also do the development and the support for their applications. For people who want to start using this solution, if they are currently using the Microsoft Stack on-premises, moving to Microsoft Azure will be good. 'm giving Microsoft Azure a score of eight out of ten.

Azure is user-friendly which is great for those with no code experience, though this limits flexibility. This is a very simple solution. Their integration with Office 365 is very easy. And for those who are enterprise customers already using Office 365, their role-based access control communicating with Azure is much simpler and easier which allows for full control. I would rate this a nine out of ten.

My advice to others before implementing this solution is to be well-documented in your needs and to have support from a solution provider. Additionally, be aware of exactly what support you might require before starting. I rate Microsoft Azure a seven out of ten.

I rate Microsoft Azure eight out of 10.

I am very happy with the solution. Thanks to the training I have received from Microsoft Azure, which cost £60,000, I'm up-skilling all my team for the certification, databases, and machine learning tool. Every month I'm receiving approximately £1,000 from the training credit for the up-skilling. It is simple to start with Microsoft Azure if you know the application life cycle. You can try so many things without any cost because of the serverless system. You will not be charged for any request at the beginning. For example, you are creating a function application in Azure the first 10,000 requests are free. It is great because you can anyone a developer to test anything. They're not using very heavy machine learning systems, the system is generally cheap. For example, they are giving a free month trial and a developer can't finish it personally if they do not use a large computing machine. At the moment they are adding new features faster than I expected. For example, they have Python support but five years ago there wasn't any Python support. They were slow at the beginning but now it updates very quickly. For example, the community services for the low code, no code power platforms, and the power platforms. I spoke to my developers, machine learning engineer, data engineer, and data scientists and told them please use the auto ML or the community services better. As a London business user site team, we can create all the virtual agents and AI builders with the no code platform for the machine learning models for the power applications. The auto ML is very powerful and you don't need to be an expert in machine learning. I rate Microsoft Azure a nine out of ten.

I would rate Microsoft Azure a 10 out of 10.

In the next release of Microsoft Azure, they will be addressing the problem of the continuous ETL workload to continually extract the data and ingest it in a docker analysis database. This will be released in the next version released in 2022. Microsoft Azure is continuously improving the solution for the market. It is important to know that cloud services work differently than on-premise solutions. I was talking with our colleague in the internal department to let me test the scalability of his system because we have a process from our application to the online shop. They are having a problem with the scalability test because of their hardware. They have hardware that they can't scale the testing environment. Using Microsoft Azure we do not have these issues because it is on the cloud. I rate Microsoft Azure a nine out of ten.

I would recommend this solution to others who are considering using it. I would rate Microsoft Azure a nine out of ten.

I rate Microsoft Azure an eight out of ten. There are some quirks, but in terms of managing and configuring infrastructures, it's fairly good. I recommend Azure because it's a top-class cloud solution provider, so there aren't many issues.

I would advise those thinking about using Microsoft Azure to try it out, especially for businesses. If you know that your office might be moving, instead of having all the cost of physical hardware to either get rid of or repurchase, the cost of the subscription is going to be a lot less than moving all your physical servers, storage devices, and computers. You won't have any maintenance, the need to worry about hardware breaking, hardware crashing, or people breaking any of the hardware. The workstations and connectivity are all they would need to worry about if they decided to move from one spot to the other. I rate Microsoft Azure an eight out of ten.

I rate Azure nine out of 10. I would recommend it to others.

I would recommend this cloud computing service to new users. On a scale from one to ten, I would give Microsoft Azure a nine.

The solution is also cloud-based. At present, two of my clients are using the solution. I would not recommend the solution to someone who does not require it, instead referring the person to AWS. Like Microsoft Azure, AWS is also not sufficiently intuitive, although it is a more robust solution in my experience. I rate Microsoft Azure as a six out of ten.

I would recommend this solution to others. I rate Microsoft Azure a seven out of ten.

I would recommend this solution to others. I rate Microsoft Azure a nine out of ten.

We are currently in the process of deploying Zabbix to cover our monitoring needs. We have used other monitoring products which come with certain components. From my point of view, it would depend on the type of solution and everything they were trying to encompass. In our case, it made sense to go with Azure. I think that for other companies, I would recommend that it's a good solution, but that depends on what problem you are trying to solve. It also depends on what infrastructure is already in place, and whether you want to have a lot of disparate systems communicating, or whether you want to consolidate that to a specific vendor. But for the purposes of what we needed Azure to do, it does the job. However, we don't use all of the MS Apps functionality. It does the job, but it doesn't wow me. I am pretty happy with it. I don't get overly excited about it, but I am not disappointed with it. I would rate Microsoft Azure a six out of ten.

I would recommend this solution to others. I would rate Microsoft Azure a nine out of ten.

The smooth operation of the solution depends on the ability of the administrator. How the infrastructure is deployed overall and how it is optimized. I would recommend this solution to others. I rate Microsoft Azure an eight out of ten.

We are Azure partners. I'm mainly providing services to my customers, and therefore am not necessarily an end-user. For the most part, I would recommend Azure. However, we cannot just recommend Azure blindly. Azure suits mostly the customers that are using the Microsoft suite of products. It brings your own licenses into the play so that you don't end up with another cloud. If you're using Microsoft products, then Azure is a straight fit for you. You should not evaluate any other cloud. However, if you're not using the Microsoft suite of products, if you're using MS Skills, running Solaris, and all of those things, then you have to evaluate which cloud is better. I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten.

I recommend this solution to others. I rate Microsoft Azure a ten out of ten.

I would recommend this solution. I rate Microsoft Azure a nine out of ten.

Overall, I would recommend Azure to anyone who is interested in using it. I would rate Microsoft Azure a nine out of ten.

We are customers and end-users, however, we are also advisors. We give advice on products to our customers. As the solution is cloud-based, it's consistently updated and we are always on whatever the latest version is. We've been quite happy with its capabilities. I'd rate it at an eight out of ten. I would recommend the solution to other users or companies that want to start exploring it.

There are approximately 100 users utilizing the solution in our organization. I would definitely recommend it to others. I rate Microsoft Azure as a seven out of ten.

As it's a cloud-based solution, we're always on the latest version. it automatically self-updates. I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We've mostly been quite happy with the capability of the solution. I'd recommend the solution to other users and other organizations.

We're customers and end-users. We use both the cloud and on-premises. We're using the latest version of the solution. I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten. It's very good, however, it has room to grow. I'd highly recommend the solution to other individuals and organizations.

I would advise others to do their research before they purchase any platform service. Everything could look fine on the surface but if you do not understand things, such as DPUs and flexible databases, you can run into some difficulties. I rate Microsoft Azure an eight out of ten.

I would definitely recommend Azure because it's an enterprise trade cloud platform and can provide valuable insights of your data and of metrics of data sources in real time. It's totally secure, comes with support and numerous code development languages enabling scaling as you go. I rate this solution an eight out of 10.

It is great for a new workload and if you are starting with new systems. I would rate Microsoft Azure a seven out of ten.

We plan to continue using the solution in the future and I recommend it to others. I rate Microsoft Azure an eight out of ten.

I would recommend this solution to new users. If you want to get a free subscription or trial, it is quite good. Even for an organization, it is good because of the number of requests they offer in the free version. There are many. On a scale from one to ten, I would give Microsoft Azure an eight.

I rate Microsoft Azure a seven out of ten.

I would recommend this solution to potential users. On a scale from one to ten, I would give Microsoft Azure an eight.

My advice is to keep an eye on your usage otherwise you could wind up with a hefty bill. The biggest lesson I have learned is that Microsoft Azure is very dynamic — the environment is very dynamic. Microsoft Azure is absolutely great. On a scale from one to ten, I would give it a rating of eight because it's user-friendly and very simple to use. All of the basic features are covered. Some things can be tricky, but there is always a simple solution.

I'm a Microsoft reseller. I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using. While we are currently using the on-premises deployment model, we are considering moving to the cloud. I'd recommend the solution to other users and organizations. I'm already recommending it to various clients as a potential solution for them. I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. We're quite satisfied with the solution.

I would recommend this solution to others and we are going to continue using it in the future. We have numerous clients switching to this solution. I rate Microsoft Azure a nine out of ten.

I would rate Microsoft Azure at eight on a scale from one to ten.

I'm a consultant. As we are using the cloud version of the solution, we are always using the latest version as well. It updates automatically. I'd recommend the solution to other organizations. I would rate the solution at a nine out of ten.

We are a customer and end-user. We don't have a business relationship with Microsoft. We deployed the solution in multiple ways. We've used the solution both on-premises and on the cloud. I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten.

I can sometimes see that Microsoft has poor training, but to be honest the whole training thing isn't good at a technical level. They are designed to be the entrance point and show the way you can create a web portal and database. But if they could offer an in-depth technical solution of Azure services that would be good. It's possible that Google has something about it and they can offer better learning than Microsoft sometimes does. Reading through their documentation can take some time. I rate this solution a nine out of 10.

The advice I would give potential users would be to focus on their cost management skills and metering skills. It's all about managing your consumption. You've got to understand your consumption patterns and then learn how to manage consumption patterns going forward. It's a really good product. In terms of leading hyperscalers, they offer very competitive features, functions, and rates compared to AWS and Google. They continue to advance their technical capabilities as rapidly or more rapidly than the other two hyperscalers. So, I would rate Microsoft Azure very high. On a scale from one to ten, I would give Microsoft Azure a nine.

I would recommend this solution to others. I would rate Microsoft Azure an eight out of ten.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate this solution at eight. It is a very stable and secure product. It is also easier to use than AWS.

I would rate Microsoft Azure an eight out of ten because my environment is Windows-based. For a non-Microsoft environment, I would rate it a seven out of ten.

Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of eight.

If Microsoft Azure meets the demands of the company, we would recommend it. Other companies, may require products like Amazon, or they use their own data center. It depends on the company. I would rate most of the areas in Microsoft Azure an eight out of ten.

A company should look at the suitability for their use case before choosing a solution. I rate this solution an eight out of 10.

You have to look out for the external storage costs — it can be a bit of a surprise. You have to do your budgeting. We didn't really anticipate that the storage expenses would be so much higher than anything else. That's something people have to budget and account for before they migrate to the cloud. Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this soluting a rating of eight.

I would absolutely recommend this solution to other users. Microsoft Azure has all of the latest cloud services with all high availability and scalability. It's also very secure. The cost is more or less the same across all cloud service providers, too. Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of nine. Due to the pandemic, I haven't been able to utilize their full resources.This has made it complicated to scale up. I hope this will be resolved after the pandemic.

Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give Microsoft Azure a rating of eight. It's a good product. It does have a few flaws but it's solid.

If you're interested in going with Microsoft, my advice would be to do it. Everybody's using Microsoft. Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of seven. The problem is that I'm an old Microsoft engineer. I like to build it the way I want to build it. I don't want it to be SaaS. I liked the fact that you could build your servers in the AWS environment and build out the servers the way you want. They're actually taking away a lot of the applications. More and more companies are switching to SaaS or IAS, etc. Now, the structure is going towards SaaS. I think I have a three-year lifecycle on my licenses and then I will have to drop or either migrate my data to SaaS. It's probably cheaper for people to go that way, but it gives you less flexibility. There's probably more security, but you're depending on the vendor's security or however they have that set up. You lose a lot of your flexibility when you go into SaaS.

It's a good product and I recommend it to others. I would rate it a nine out of ten.

I would definitely recommend this solution. I rate it an eight out of 10.

I am a Microsoft partner, so I would, of course, recommend it. I would recommend Azure, then AWS, and then Google. I would rate Microsoft Azure a nine out of ten.

I recommend this solution. I rate Microsoft Azure a ten out of ten.

I would recommend this solution. We plan to keep using it. I would rate Microsoft Azure a seven out of ten.

Overall, this is a good product. We definitely plan to continue using it in the future and I recommend it to others. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

For anyone who is interested in using this solution, I would recommend it. I would rate Microsoft Azure a nine out of ten.

If a company wants to concentrate more on their mission and less on supporting infrastructure, they should give Azure a go. I find that it saves us a lot of time. I would rate this solution an eight out of 10.

It is a good solution. If you have any on-premise applications, you have to be very careful about the architecture. What you don't want to do is copy what you have in your data center and put it on the cloud because there are various alternatives once you are in the cloud. Therefore, I would recommend others to review the architecture and take advantage of the features that it provides. I would rate Microsoft Azure a nine out of ten. We are happy with Microsoft and this solution.

I rate Microsoft Azure an nine out of ten.

We're just a customer. We aren't a reseller or consultant and we don't have a professional business relationship with Microsoft. We only really use the solution to host a website, and therefore we don't really use the full scope of features right now. I'd recommend the solution to other organizations as it is rather easy to use. Overall, we've been quite happy with the product. I'd rate it eight out of ten.

I would recommend this solution. It is a good solution. I would rate Microsoft Azure a nine out of ten.

This is a good product and I recommend it to others who are interested in using it. I would rate Microsoft Azure an eight out of ten.

This is definitely a product that I recommend, but it has to be done smartly. Not everything can be migrated and you shouldn't try to migrate everything as-is. It has to be done properly and people have to understand how services that are to be migrated need to be done. Also, there are some services that should not be migrated because it is better to keep them on your own cloud. This should all be studied in advance. I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.

I would advise taking care of the intermediate layers between your business and Microsoft. They aren't good. I would rate Microsoft Azure an eight out of ten. This rating is based on the general features. If they put more programming languages, I would rate it a ten. It is a good product.

We use both Private Cloud and Public Cloud. For Banks it's generally through Private Cloud, otherwise, it's on a Public Cloud, as we deliver services as well on Azure. This is a product that I can recommend to others. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

We're a gold partner with Microsoft in Bangladesh. We're always using the latest version of the solution as Azure constantly updates itself. I'd recommend the product to other organizations. Overall, I would rate the solution at a seven out of ten. Mostly we've been happy with it, however, we do find the pricing to be a bit high.

We're just a customer and an end-user. We don't have a business relationship with Microsoft. I'd recommend the solution for larger clients, especially if they are based in Europe or America. In general, on a scale from one to ten, I'd rate this product at a seven. It's been mostly good for us. However, it could use much better technical support and documentation to make things easier.

Azure is a good product and I can recommend it to others. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We're simply Microsoft customers. We don't have a business relationship with the company. Overall, I would rate the solution eight out of ten. We're mostly happy with it, although we would prefer if pricing was more transparent.

Overall, this product is very good and I can recommend it. It would be difficult to improve. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

I would advise others to go for the closest possible platform as a service. Do not go for infrastructure as a service; go for platform as a service. I would rate Microsoft Azure a nine out of ten.

I would advise starting directly with Microsoft and then asking the vendors to recommend the trusted partners to work on the implementation or migration, and not vice versa. First, talk with the architect of the design and see if they can recommend a trusted partner who can do the implementation. I would rate Microsoft Azure a nine out of ten. It is a big product and platform. It covers many things in terms of features.

This is a product that is fast-growing and they are gaining popularity. We have invested in it, and plan to keep using it for the next five or ten years. In my opinion, it is an awesome product. Microsoft is everywhere and it predates the cloud. Everything that they have is easy to use. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

The suitability of this product depends on the customer's requirements and needs. AWS is stable and nice, the Google Cloud Platform is really improving a lot, and IBM Cloud is also available. The decision for which to use will be based on what kind of solutions you are deploying and how you want to integrate them. Ultimately, it is best to choose the provider that is most suitable for your existing workload. Overall, this is a good solution but there are certainly features that need to be improved, as well as the pricing. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

It is a cloud solution at the end of the day. People can pick up any cloud solution, but Azure is renowned. Azure and AWS are the main competitors in the cloud market now. AWS comes first, and Azure comes after that. If your solution is predominantly in the Linux space, you should go for AWS. If you are primarily Windows-based, you should go for Azure. I would rate Microsoft Azure an eight out of ten.

I can recommend this solution because of its capability and scalability. In terms of improvements, I cannot think of any specific requests for new features at this time. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We're Azure partners. We have a business relationship with the company. I'd advise others that Azure is good for monitoring for a small to mid-size organization. For those, it works well. For very complex scenarios, it will be difficult to manage. I'd rate the solution six out of ten. It's much to complicated for larger organizations.

I'm a consultant. I work as a partner with Microsoft. We're using the latest version of the solution at this time. I would recommend the solution to others. I'd rate it nine out of ten overall.

I would recommend anyone wanting to implement this solution to carry out background homework on active directory, on information access management (IAM), and then understand the licensing before you deploy. That aside, it's pretty straightforward. I've learned that setting up secure documents doesn't have to be difficult as long as you take into account those caveats of understanding your licensing and active directory. I would rate this solution an eight out of 10.

I would rate Microsoft Azure a ten out of ten.

Microsoft Azure is a good service and I recommend it. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

Depending on the project requirements, I would recommend using Azure. I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.

We found it difficult to train our regular Windows admins to dive into Azure things, so it's important to get the right people or the project is doomed. There are too many people who don't really want to get to grips with the cloud. I would also suggest not starting from a fully regulated basis. We have our deployment fully integrated with Azure Active Directory, which can be quite a hindrance when it comes to just playing around with things. It's essential to give people developer accounts where they can just play around, break things, work through them, like a little lab. I would rate this solution an eight out of 10.

For the most part, Microsoft Azure works well. They are constantly upgrading their services. That said, I don't think that it's perfect. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

We don't have customer reviews of some of those applications. They should provide a lot of understanding. If reviewing and rating also becomes one of the alternatives, I think that will be a big win for them. They are loaded with functionalities. I would rate Azure a seven out of ten. They are very open with the options, but customers are not there with the road map. There are too many options. That confusion is a con of the solution.

My advice for anybody who is considering this solution is to do a proof of concept first. This is what I suggest to all of our customers, especially before migrating to the cloud. It will ensure that it meets the requirements. I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.

If you look at it from the cloud product perspective, AWS is first. There is no doubt about it, and Azure is in the second position, and Google is the third. Serverless is something that Microsoft needs to focus on, it is not so mature. That would be a game-changer. I would rate it a seven out of ten. Not a ten because they need to improve in terms of maturity, flexibility, and user experience.

I would definitely recommend Azure as a solution because it is a popular product by a major brand and it is very easy to use. I think those people I would recommend it to should normally be those who understand the cloud and the advantages and disadvantages. I use it for a lot of things and I do not see any problems. I love it now as a solution so I would recommend it. But if I have a different experience with another very large migration project using a different product, I would have to compare Azure with that. I may get more comfortable with the other product for reasons I have not discovered yet. On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate Microsoft Azure as a seven-out-of-ten. It is a good product and I love using it but it could do even more and has a lot of possibilities to grow as part of a relatively new technology. The future is more open than closed to the possibilities.

There are multiple players in the market and this seems to be a good solution. It really depends on the use case and on the customer. I would personally choose AWS over Azure because that's where my experience is and I'm more familiar with AWS. I would rate this solution a seven out of 10.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

I would rate Microsoft Azure at an eight out of a scale of ten.

My advice for anybody who is considering this product is that it can be a good start for SME, up to MNC who needs to see their full environment, rather than just a particular system or area. Overall, this is a good solution but there is room for improvement. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

I would rate this solution a nine because they are always incorporating new alerts and new features. I wouldn't give it a ten because it's sometimes not easy to use and the price is not a fair price for the solution. I don't know why customers think that Amazon is the best. I think that the customer thinks that the best option for cloud is an Amazon service and the second one is Microsoft. My advice to someone considering this or a similar solution is to be careful with Amazon because the customers think that they are always on the list.

If you are a C#, .NET or SQL server person, do not even think about using AWS, use Azure instead. If you are more of a Linux/PHP/Java type of person, you may consider AWS as it works much better from the command line and much more like a Linux or Java environment.

I would rate this solution a seven out of 10. Most important criteria for selecting a vendor: The client will choose the license and buy it. We can try to convince them, but we can not compel them to use a specific vendor's license. Ultimately, the decision-maker is the client.

When choosing a vendor what's important to me are stability, a lot of features, variety, and good support. My advice would be, try it using the free trial and I am sure you will be satisfied and take it.