I would recommend ensuring that you perform regular backups, specifically the TX backup, which is essential for Portworx. It's crucial to note that no other backup software is suitable for this purpose. Therefore, when obtaining the enterprise license, including a comprehensive backup solution is important as part of the package. Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.
As a company managed in a Kubernetes environment, being trusted by a Kubernetes vendor, Red Hat creates barriers against using other certified solutions that work. Because IBM is a competitor of Pure Storage, things seem to be getting worse. I don't have plans to use Portworx Enterprise in the future because, at the moment, I am working with Ondat, and I have to follow NetApp's direction on that. When evaluating Portworx, one should make sure their company has already chosen Pure Storage. Still, if they are evaluating the solution on Ondat or Dell or other platforms, they should get a roadmap statement from Pure Storage, that they will continue to develop storage hardware diagnostics. I rate Portworx a nine out of ten.
Database Infrastructure Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
May 10, 2023
I would recommend the solution depending on the use case. If a use case demands support, and the high-performance, then you should go for Portworx. Also, consider the type of application you want to use it for and take certain factors into consideration before going into the storage, VPS layer, or CSI. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten because of the data locality, documentation, and possibly a cheaper price, which could increase the score. It works quite well under intensive load, and support is available. It does what it has to do at the end of the day.
Business Development Manager of Storage Systems at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Dec 24, 2021
I rate Portworx Enterprise 10 out of 10. I would recommend Portworx for anyone who uses Kubernetes or any other kind of container. Portworx is a great solution for managing container environments.
Director of Information Technology at a logistics company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Oct 15, 2021
Portworx. We haven't done anything. We are licensed for Portworx, but we haven't implemented it and incorporated it into our use case scenario. However, we will use Portworx with our Kubernetes cluster. Some of us use Portworx on a personal level, which is their lighter version of Portworx, and it's amazing. Pure, is an amazing company. That company has kept its word. I have other businesses that I talk to that leverage them, and we all feel the same way. Pure came into the industry and said, I'm going to answer your questions and I'm going to address your complaints. And they did. I would rate Portworx Enterprise a ten out of ten.
Cloud Software Defined Storage offers flexibility, scalability, and efficient storage management through software-centric architectures. This solution is ideal for dynamic business environments that require agile data handling and robust storage solutions.
The scalability of Cloud Software Defined Storage solutions differentiates them from traditional storage methods. They enable businesses to efficiently manage and scale their storage capabilities as data demands evolve. With...
I would recommend ensuring that you perform regular backups, specifically the TX backup, which is essential for Portworx. It's crucial to note that no other backup software is suitable for this purpose. Therefore, when obtaining the enterprise license, including a comprehensive backup solution is important as part of the package. Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.
As a company managed in a Kubernetes environment, being trusted by a Kubernetes vendor, Red Hat creates barriers against using other certified solutions that work. Because IBM is a competitor of Pure Storage, things seem to be getting worse. I don't have plans to use Portworx Enterprise in the future because, at the moment, I am working with Ondat, and I have to follow NetApp's direction on that. When evaluating Portworx, one should make sure their company has already chosen Pure Storage. Still, if they are evaluating the solution on Ondat or Dell or other platforms, they should get a roadmap statement from Pure Storage, that they will continue to develop storage hardware diagnostics. I rate Portworx a nine out of ten.
I would recommend the solution depending on the use case. If a use case demands support, and the high-performance, then you should go for Portworx. Also, consider the type of application you want to use it for and take certain factors into consideration before going into the storage, VPS layer, or CSI. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten because of the data locality, documentation, and possibly a cheaper price, which could increase the score. It works quite well under intensive load, and support is available. It does what it has to do at the end of the day.
I give the solution a ten out of ten.
I rate Portworx Enterprise 10 out of 10. I would recommend Portworx for anyone who uses Kubernetes or any other kind of container. Portworx is a great solution for managing container environments.
Portworx. We haven't done anything. We are licensed for Portworx, but we haven't implemented it and incorporated it into our use case scenario. However, we will use Portworx with our Kubernetes cluster. Some of us use Portworx on a personal level, which is their lighter version of Portworx, and it's amazing. Pure, is an amazing company. That company has kept its word. I have other businesses that I talk to that leverage them, and we all feel the same way. Pure came into the industry and said, I'm going to answer your questions and I'm going to address your complaints. And they did. I would rate Portworx Enterprise a ten out of ten.