Solution Architect at Column Software Solutions Pvt. Ltd
Real User
Jun 13, 2023
The solution is more costly than the other competitors, like HP automation products. It charges more for the features and support services. Although, its support needs improvement. We prefer open-source solutions if they provide all accesses and credentials for configuration.
Senior Security Solution Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Jun 26, 2019
There's a fee for the licenses themselves, per contract, and then we have a yearly licensing fee that's many thousands of dollars. But that's not just for TrueSight, that's also for support for ITSM, Atrium Orchestrator, BBNA, and other BMC tools in the environment. We have to support more than just TrueSight in that space. It's a package deal from a support perspective. From a licensing perspective, when we get a contract in we size the contract, do quotes from the contract, and then we engage BMC to say, “This is how many additional licenses we're going to need as a function of that contract.” Then we do the numbers thing. But we've actually dumped a lot of money. I think recently it was about $174,000. But again, it depends on the contract, it depends on what we're dealing with. It's been many thousands of dollars.
Learn what your peers think about BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks provides valuable automation in network processes like compliance and configuration management while ensuring consistent device setups and robust security.
BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks is an effective tool for automating network processes, reducing manual labor through automation of patching and OS updates. Its compliance, configuration management, and oversight features such as change tracking and audit logs enhance control and visibility. The...
The product is expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
The solution is more costly than the other competitors, like HP automation products. It charges more for the features and support services. Although, its support needs improvement. We prefer open-source solutions if they provide all accesses and credentials for configuration.
The solution is worth the price.
The pricing has been alright.
There's a fee for the licenses themselves, per contract, and then we have a yearly licensing fee that's many thousands of dollars. But that's not just for TrueSight, that's also for support for ITSM, Atrium Orchestrator, BBNA, and other BMC tools in the environment. We have to support more than just TrueSight in that space. It's a package deal from a support perspective. From a licensing perspective, when we get a contract in we size the contract, do quotes from the contract, and then we engage BMC to say, “This is how many additional licenses we're going to need as a function of that contract.” Then we do the numbers thing. But we've actually dumped a lot of money. I think recently it was about $174,000. But again, it depends on the contract, it depends on what we're dealing with. It's been many thousands of dollars.