GitHub Reviews

Users report significant time savings with GitHub, translating to financial gains. Enhanced codebase management, version control, and streamlined product releases contribute to strong ROI. Security improvements and faster market delivery of features are noted. Cost benefits become apparent with increased usage. GitHub's adaptability in managing source codes across devices is valued. While initial cost savings were minimal, organizational efficiency and avoidance of disputes were cited as key benefits. No basic investment was required for some, enhancing perceived value.

Enterprise users generally find GitHub's pricing reasonable, with free versions available for open-source and public repositories. However, private and enterprise features require annual or monthly fees. Users experience difficulties with the licensing model, particularly in managing seats as team members change. Some users are unaware of exact costs due to internal management handling these expenses. Overall, while some suggest pricing could be improved, especially for developing regions, most agree it aligns well with market standards.

• "I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."
• "Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."
• "GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

Primary use cases for GitHub include version control, code storage, collaboration, and CI/CD integration. Teams use it to manage code repositories, support branching strategies, and facilitate development across diverse projects. It's widely used for personal projects, enterprise-level collaborations, and as a cloud-based resource for integrating with various DevOps tools. GitHub provides a centralized platform for tracking changes, enhancing teamwork, and ensuring seamless project management.

GitHub support is generally praised for quick responses and technical expertise. Many users rely on their community and online resources instead of direct contact, finding them sufficient for resolving issues. However, some indicate that official support could be more responsive. Users who have engaged with technical support often express satisfaction, noting effective communication. The community support is invaluable, helping users find solutions through shared knowledge and experience, complementing the empowered internal teams in organizations.

GitHub's initial setup is generally described as easy and straightforward by many users. They highlight its simplicity, ease of use, and quick installation time, often taking less than 15 minutes. Challenges noted include integrating with private repositories, understanding certain configurations, and using advanced features. For organizations, setup might involve additional complexity due to security needs or infrastructure creation, yet overall, users find the setup process well-documented and manageable with available online resources.

GitHub is praised for its scalability. Many organizations, from small teams to thousands of users, utilize GitHub without encountering performance issues. Its cloud-based nature allows seamless scaling, supporting numerous projects and a large number of users. Users consistently commend its ability to support growth effortlessly, making it suitable for enterprise-level deployments. GitHub's scalability often receives high satisfaction ratings, with several users indicating no concerns even in complex environments.

Users find GitHub largely stable, with minimal glitches or downtimes. It handles over 1,000 users daily with no crashes or freezes. While some experience brief connection issues, performance remains reliable and suitable for various company sizes. Users often rate stability highly, ranging from seven to ten out of ten. It's dependable, supporting code management efficiently, and users appreciate its high availability, especially under normal load conditions.