What is our primary use case?
The primary use case is LAN switching. Users connect to these switches to access other corporate resources.
We deployed them for LAN switching across the organization. They do quite well in terms of both functionality and configuration.
How has it helped my organization?
HPE switches have supported our data center connectivity and improved our office network operations.
They do quite well when it comes to switching. We also use their wireless products, but the integration between them can vary. However, the switching functionality and configuration are both very good.
They facilitate easy connectivity between data centers and between data centers and campus networks. They are an integral part.
It was very easy to integrate the HPE switches with our existing network infrastructure.
What is most valuable?
Compared to other vendors, their support really stands out. They're always willing to help with expansion support needs and understand customer concerns well. They're eager to help, which I always adore and admire about HPE.
Additionally, their products are very stable and easily scalable.
HPE Ethernet Switches are very reliable. While some smaller products might not have dual power supplies, they typically offer redundant power supplies and CPUs depending on the model and requirement. Overall, they are quite reliable.
What needs improvement?
Some users might look for high-speed switching like Cisco or Nexus switches, which can handle larger volumes. HPE's current offerings aren't as robust in that area, but they could improve.
So, HPE could offer higher-end products for data center and LAN connectivity.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using it for six years. I use the latest version.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
HPE Ethernet Switches are quite stable. The version releases are good, and they patch any security vulnerabilities they find. They could even offer further improvements in that area.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
HPE Ethernet Switches are scalable.
We have around 3,000 end users. If the need arises, we plan to increase the number of users in the future.
How are customer service and support?
The customer service and support are very good; they are HPE's USP.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did use Cisco. HPE performs well for LAN switching, Wi-Fi, and even some routing. However, when it comes to WAN switching, Cisco is generally preferred.
While HPE's routing capabilities are good, Cisco might be preferable for complex routing scenarios.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward.
The steps are simple, and you can always contact support if needed. Overall, it's easy.
The deployment process includes racking and stacking, connecting to uplinks and enabling downlinks, configuring for interconnectivity and data center connections, and then configuring all ports (uplink and downlink).
What about the implementation team?
We did it in-house. For maintenance, a team of five should be sufficient for 3,000 users. We have around three to four engineers and one manager.
What was our ROI?
The ROI is quite good. The value is quite high in terms of reliability. We don't have much incidents with the devices.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The support is included with the product.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend using this product. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
It is quite a reliable product with all the features and is quite easy to implement.
Moreover, the troubleshooting operations are quite easy.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.