Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Icinga Logo

Icinga Reviews

Vendor: Icinga
3.8 out of 5
2,307 followers
Start review

What is Icinga?

Get the report
Helped 842,767 peers since 2012

Featured Icinga reviews

Icinga mindshare

As of April 2025, the mindshare of Icinga in the Network Monitoring Software category stands at 3.4%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software

PeerAnalyst reports based on Icinga reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryNetwork Monitoring SoftwareApr 1, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersApr 1, 2025Download
ComparisonIcinga vs ZabbixApr 1, 2025Download
ComparisonIcinga vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)Apr 1, 2025Download
ComparisonIcinga vs DatadogApr 1, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Datadog4.33.5%97%188 interviewsAdd to research
Zabbix4.213.0%95%105 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
Educational Organization
6%
University
6%
Hospitality Company
4%
Retailer
4%
Healthcare Company
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Construction Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Insurance Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Non Profit
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Legal Firm
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%

Compare Icinga with alternative products

Learn more about Icinga

Icinga customers

Related questions

 

Icinga reviews

Sort by:
Harrison Bulley - PeerSpot user
Senior Infrastructure Engineer at Net Consulting
Verified user of Icinga
May 31, 2023
A stable, scalable and cost-effective solution that helps with inbuilt scripts for easy modification

Pros

"I like the ability to amend and adjust things really easily, which is useful in a case where you could make it auto-discover and then set a template to say all of these applications or servers under this template have an automatic threshold set that you’d set up manually."

Cons

"I think the software is quite good, but we have had problems with getting it to recognize certain areas and amend certain checks, where we needed so we would have to create backend scripts for those checks. Though, being open source, it has the support to create backend scripts, it would be better to have these scripts in-built."
Lasse Wackers - PeerSpot user
Senior System Integration Engineer at SVA System Vertrieb Alexander GmbH
Verified user of Icinga
Jun 4, 2023
It's a flexible platform that has powerful automation capabilities, but it's complicated and hard to learn

Pros

"Icinga has multiple automation and integration features. There is an API for everything and a web UI for configurations. The APIs enable you to automate tasks in Icinga. We can also use plugins to talk to the API. The Icinga Director talks to a database in the background, and you can import settings from the CMDB to all systems in Icinga. "

Cons

"Icinga is a complex solution that's hard to learn. It's a powerful product for monitoring, but new users will have a hard time figuring out what to do. "
Find out what your peers are saying about Icinga. Updated March 2025
842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Claudio Kuenzler - PeerSpot user
Senior Systems Engineer at Infiniroot
Verified user of Icinga
May 30, 2023
Product version discussed: 2
A free and time-saving product that helps to monitor servers and network devices

Pros

"The apply rules feature saves a lot of time."

Cons

"The user interface should be improved."
Aynalem Yehualaw - PeerSpot user
System Engineer at Jimma University
Verified user of Icinga
Dec 18, 2022
Good monitoring, able to expand, and generally reliable

Pros

"We have found the solution to be stable. "

Cons

"The installation and configuration are very complex."
Aditi Mishra - PeerSpot user
Monitoring Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Verified user of Icinga
Jul 21, 2023
Product version discussed: 2.11
Excels as a monitoring tool for Linux and AIX servers, providing health checks, service monitoring, process tracking, and overall system health management

Pros

"It is really easy in Icinga to create your own plugin and integrate it without any fuss. And it works just perfectly fine."

Cons

"One thing that Icinga lacks is the capability to create advanced and customized dashboards within the tool itself. "
RO
CEO at Orbitron, s. r. o.
Verified user of Icinga
Dec 27, 2022
Product version discussed: 2.9
Useful for monitoring infrastructure devices like network devices, firewalls, and servers, but support isn't very responsive

Pros

"There's a module called Icinga Director, which helps us configure the product using an intuitive interface through clicks instead of creating a text configuration. It's very helpful for us."

Cons

"We have found some problems with Nagios, and support isn't very responsive. "
YI
Team lead at NTG
Verified user of Icinga
Nov 13, 2023
A tool to monitor servers with an easy initial setup phase and great stability

Pros

"The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first."

Cons

"The tool currently fails to provide notifications to users."
PeerSpot user
Innovation Service Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Verified user of Icinga
May 22, 2024
Easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have but average multi-tenancy aspect

Pros

"The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated."

Cons

"There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved. "