JD Edwards World Reviews

JD Edwards World pricing is considered reasonable for a legacy solution, with reduced costs compared to modern tools like SAP and Salesforce. Licensing is user-based, affecting overall expenses. While some find it affordable, others note increasing annual renewal fees and additional implementation expenses. The cost is rated mid-range, neither premium nor budget-friendly, scored eight out of ten for pricing satisfaction. Users highlight the need for a detailed cost matrix and functionality chart.

• "You have to pay for a license, and the license cost is calculated based on the number of users you have."
• "The pricing for JD Edwards World could be more affordable."
• "The price of JD Edwards World is reasonable. Since it is a legacy solution the price has been reduced."

Organizations primarily use JD Edwards World for finance, distribution, and manufacturing. They utilize modules for financials, taxes, supply chain, procurement, and capital asset management. It supports retail businesses, warehouse management, and HR, providing crucial operations for generating configurable bills in manufacturing. Despite some modified code issues, it remains integral for maintaining intercontinental communication and operational backbone for various sectors, including sales, accounting, warehouse management, and supply chain functions.

JD Edwards World is noted for its stability and reliability, with users finding the system helpful. The customer service team responds, but experiences vary, featuring both positive and negative aspects. While some integrate internal support, those engaging technical support appreciate the prompt service and efficient solutions, such as scripts. Users find support beneficial during asset management tasks, though challenges arise in sourcing resources due to its legacy nature.

JD Edwards World's initial setup is generally easy and not complex for companies. Some commented that the setup process might take one to two weeks, with potential help needed for multiple modules. While some found upgrades to be okay, others noted the difficulty over time due to frequent command usage. Setting up is manageable if tasks are well-understood. However, challenges may arise with IBM hardware, requiring specific skills. Setup ratings varied, with one rating it as a seven out of ten.

JD Edwards World exhibits robust scalability, handling up to thousands of users, making it ideal for medium to large companies but costly for smaller ones. Users note its ability to support extensive customizations, especially for regional adaptations, while highlighting some challenges integrating new interfaces. The system smoothly accommodates business growth and expands functionalities without issues, though users rate its scalability between seven and eight out of ten, indicating room for improvement in certain areas.

JD Edwards World is praised for its high stability, being more reliable than JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. Users note its resistance to bugs, glitches, crashes, and freezing. While mostly stable, concerns arise when nearing 75% of planned capacity, leading to occasional login issues. Integrations or network problems might contribute to these concerns. Users describe World as one of the most stable ERPs available, rating its stability at eight out of ten.