Microsoft Azure Object Storage Reviews

Users report a positive return with Microsoft Azure Object Storage. The scalability allows growth without needing infrastructure teams. Azure provides significant financial advantages by avoiding hardware costs. Opinions differ; some see it as market fit, while some do not. Costs are low compared to database storage, incentivizing data migration. Users highlight stable uptime and good return when using appropriate tools. Limited usage time prevents some from evaluating return fully, though they anticipate future benefits.

Microsoft Azure Object Storage pricing is based on traffic, storage class, data size, and requests. Users often find it competitive yet confusing. Standard pay-as-you-go and monthly licensing models are common, with optional packages for technical support. Costs can rise for intensive use, but discounts exist for reserved instances. Enterprises generally see it as expensive, though flexible, especially for standard usage. Small businesses may find it less affordable, with costs influenced by usage complexity.

• "The price will be more competitive when we increase the time spent using the tool. For our company's size range, I think the price is okay."
• "Microsoft Azure Object Storage is an expensive solution."
• "The pricing is competitive."

Organizations primarily utilize Microsoft Azure Object Storage for data storage, backups, and archiving. It supports various use cases, including educational campus management, secure email services, IoT analytics, disaster recovery, consultancy services, file and image storage, data lakes, Kubernetes storage, and cloud-based analytics. Azure Object Storage helps with email, messaging, unstructured data management, cold storage, and supporting big data processes. It plays a crucial role in enhancing storage capabilities at reasonable costs for diverse business requirements.

Microsoft Azure Object Storage's customer service and support are generally praised for responsiveness, especially with premium plans. While many find the support good and effective, some report slower response times and issues being transferred among engineers. Satisfaction varies, often linked to the chosen support plan. The UK team receives higher ratings compared to the Indian team. Users acknowledge Microsoft's detailed documentation but mention challenges in accessing desired assistance swiftly. High satisfaction is noted with enterprise agreements.

Users frequently describe Microsoft Azure Object Storage's initial setup as straightforward and simple, requiring some technical expertise. Many find deployment quick, taking from minutes to several days, but acknowledge variability based on experience and resources involved. Automation plays a significant role, often easing the process. While some mention challenges related to information size or internet speed, assistance from Microsoft integrators or experts and comprehensive documentation help overcome potential difficulties.

Microsoft Azure Object Storage exhibits impressive scalability, efficiently accommodating thousands of users across various organizations. Many entities report ease in scaling, with seamless adjustments for increased storage demands. The platform supports extensive user bases and adapts to diverse use cases with high reliability. Various reviews consistently rate its scalability highly, noting its capacity to handle substantial data processing and storage needs, contributing to a robust and flexible storage solution adaptable to organizational growth.

Users generally find Microsoft Azure Object Storage to be stable and reliable, with no major issues like crashes, bugs, or freezing. Some reported occasional problems due to specific circumstances. Stability is often rated between seven to ten out of ten, with occasional outages affecting perceived reliability. Most experiences are positive, with improvements over time contributing to its high ratings.