Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services Reviews

Enterprise buyers report mixed experiences with Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services' pricing. Some find it reasonable and cost-effective compared to alternatives, particularly for developers, while others see it as expensive due to complex licensing. Many rate the pricing a seven out of ten, indicating moderate cost. The complexity of acquiring licenses is noted, and though some users find it fitting for business needs, budget constraints may lead businesses to consider open-source options.

• "The pricing is high."
• "The product pricing is reasonable in terms of suitable features for business."
• "Value-wise, the solution's pricing is good for the price that we pay."

Organizations primarily use Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services for creating and managing reports, dashboards, and monitoring data operations. It aids in generating customized reports for diverse needs, including internal data analysis, customer requirements, KPIs, and project management. It integrates with existing applications for streamlined reporting processes and supports document export to formats like Excel and CSV. It serves enterprise-level systems and smaller applications with less complicated reporting requirements, facilitating data-driven decision-making.

Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services customer service and support receive mixed opinions. Some praise their effectiveness and promptness, citing good experiences and satisfaction. They appreciate timely responses and complex issue resolution within expected timeframes. Others report challenges in communication, delayed problem-solving, and dissatisfaction at times. Many users resort to forums, web research, or FAQs rather than contacting support. Ratings vary, with some users preferring to use support primarily for licensing due to its complexity.

Many find Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services' initial setup straightforward, often rating it around seven out of ten for ease. Setup time varies from 30 minutes to a few days, depending on deployment size and familiarity with the tool. Maintenance is typically handled by regular staff, though documentation can be challenging. Larger migrations and specific configurations might require more time and expertise, yet the setup generally integrates smoothly with existing infrastructures.

Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services scales well vertically on a Microsoft platform, with positive feedback from users in diverse roles within organizations. Horizontal scalability is sporadically addressed with mixed experiences. While some praise its adaptability, others suggest limits for larger enterprises. Usage spans from small teams to thousands of users, with scalability ratings varying widely, reflecting both satisfaction and noted challenges in configuration consistency and deployment on multiple servers.