Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services vs SAP Crystal Reports comparison

"The SQL Server Reporting Services makes it very easy to get the data whenever we need it."

"Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services has been functional whenever I needed to use it."

"I am impressed with the product's seamless integration. It can work with different databases like Oracle."

"It is a stable solution."

"The tool's valuable features are its drill-down feature, graphs, and charts."

"We were able to embed the report builder within our internal proprietary systems, improving our reporting capabilities."

"With SQL Server Reporting Services, I can create reports and printable reports, known as paginated reports."

"We get good support from Microsoft."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a fantastic way of generating reports."

"I find Crystal Reports very easy to use, even for a non-technical person."

"The most valuable feature is that from a user's point of view, it is easy to use and requires just a simple click to generate a report."

"It is an user-friendly solution."

"SAP Crystal Reports offers a plethora of features, many of which were available much earlier than in the Crystal Reports we previously used. We extensively use its capabilities for generating general reports, working with Kaspersky data, and even incorporating images into our reports. The range of functions available in SAP Crystal Reports is diverse, and we leverage them across various systems for our needs."

"The initial setup of the solution is pretty easy."

"We use SAP Crystal Reports for operational reporting."

"The overall environment is the best. Data management, graphs, and layout – everything is the best, in my opinion."

"They could improve the scalability and stability of SQL Server Reporting Services."

"Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services needs to improve performance."

"Sometimes, we need to make sure that the configuration stays consistent across the reporting instances. They all connect to the same database. So, it shares that same backend, but the reporting services itself can also be configured. On the application level, for reporting level. And it is, based on my own experience, it is a manual effort to make sure that the reporting servers are configured the same across the environment."

"We have had issues with the refresh interval since we have too many reports scheduled. Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services is also expensive."

"Tableau is more user-friendly because it doesn't need to do any extra programming. It has drag-and-drop functionality."

"There are occasions during maintenance runs when the Check Point monitoring system reports a lot of blocked sessions."

"The complex tuning for report performance is complicated. There is a lack of native support for source code control. We often need to use separate tools like VS Code or other software to manage version control and changes in the database. It would be beneficial if source code management were integrated directly into SSRS, thus eliminating the need to rely on external tools. While CLI-based operations are exemplary, the trend is towards GUI for a better user experience. Integrating both visualization and source code management within SSRS would simplify the process for users."

"The product should improve its performance."

"If at all possible, a little bit of improvement on the analytical side is needed."

"A real improvement would be a simpler system that allows users to play with the visualization without needing specialized skills and code."

"SAP Crystal Reports has some compatibility issues with third-party products."

"It has significantly enhanced security features, especially when compared to the standard security features of the earlier PeerSpot version I purchased. I've observed improvements in security, and overall, it's quite commendable. Regarding potential enhancements for the next release of this solution, I haven't closely examined SAP Crystal Reports 53. I've only encountered it briefly, perhaps once or twice. However, I anticipate that it likely offers advanced features distinct from its predecessor. I believe there may be notable improvements and additions in the latest version, and I look forward to exploring them further."

"There could be improvements made to the analytics capabilities."

"Maybe some Power BI-related features could be added, like dashboards or direct editing in reports."

"SAP Crystal Reports should provide better support for dynamic connectors."

"The financing part needs improvement."

"The price is pretty good."

"The solution is expensive."

"The tool's licensing costs are expensive."

"The pricing is high."

"Value-wise, the solution's pricing is good for the price that we pay."

"The solution is free to use for developers."

"The solution is cheaper than its alternatives."

"The product pricing is reasonable in terms of suitable features for business."

"This product costs a lot of money."

"The cost of licensing can be a significant factor to consider when upgrading or transitioning to a new version of SAP Crystal Reports. It's important to evaluate the benefits and features offered by the new version against the associated costs to ensure it aligns with your organization's needs and budget."

"We pay fifteen hundred dollars as licensing fee."

"SAP Crystal Reports is a very expensive solution."

"I feel that SAP Crystal Reports is a reasonably priced product."