StorageGRID is pretty scalable. There are two key points here: scalability and multi-tenancy. Multi-tenancy itself is another use case, typically relevant to cloud storage, SC protocol storage, or even NetApp FAS series storage. We can also leverage the NetApp Volume Service, which is available in most cloud service providers. So, multi-tenancy is built into the FAS series, making it a cloud-enabled storage solution. However, if you have a specific use case for object storage like Google Drive (which is object storage from Google), and your customer only needs the object storage with the multi-tenant feature as the single requirement, then I wouldn't recommend a heterogeneous storage approach. In that case, the object storage, which is a separate product from NetApp called StorageGRID, would be the perfect fit. It's ideal for customers who want cloud-based storage, specifically to create a public or private cloud and offer dedicated storage to their tenants or even for general internal use. So, for that scenario, I would definitely recommend StorageGRID over the E series, F series, or FAS series. Now, in terms of scalability, each model has its own feature set. For entry-level storage, the FAS series scales up to one terabyte. More specifically, the FAS releases 2750 and 2820 are quite scalable within that range. They offer cost-effective options but with lower maximum capacities (like 54TB or 48TB). On the other hand, high-end models like M5300 scale up to six to seven petabytes. The key takeaway is scalability comes at a cost. If you need a highly scalable solution, expect to pay more. Now, for StorageGRID specifically, the scalable option is the 1700 series. If you don't require scalability and prefer a cheaper archiving solution, consider the F150 or F250. F150 initially offers a lower cost, and though DXRIS isn't scalable, it's a good option for customers focused on data migration performance and lower TCO (total cost of ownership) compared to newer StorageGRID models.
