If budget allows using the per socket license and not the agent based with per GB counter for Dedup is the way to go.
New licensing is easy and affordable.
If budget allows using the per socket license and not the agent based with per GB counter for Dedup is the way to go.
New licensing is easy and affordable.
It’s simple, straightforward, and we were able to see 50% hard savings.
The setup cost is a bit high, but the solution is an all-in-one solution.
It’s simple, straightforward, and we were able to see 50% hard savings.
The setup cost is a bit high, but the solution is an all-in-one solution.
Licensing is VM based so you can buy packages or single VM. Price is not low but the power of application is high, so you will get your money back.
Pricing depends on your future growth. Start small and then scale up.
Licensing is VM based so you can buy packages or single VM. Price is not low but the power of application is high, so you will get your money back.
Pricing depends on your future growth. Start small and then scale up.
Licensing was very expensive and did not scale well if needed to move between license models.
So far I can only say that the license structure could be looked at to be aligned as either capacity-based or traditional.
Licensing was very expensive and did not scale well if needed to move between license models.
So far I can only say that the license structure could be looked at to be aligned as either capacity-based or traditional.
Licensing is per node and per protected terabyte. You will also pay 10-15% annually for support.
The ROI is huge. Not really measurable at this point, but the price of the unit was a fraction of what a couple hours of downtime could result in.
Licensing is per node and per protected terabyte. You will also pay 10-15% annually for support.
The ROI is huge. Not really measurable at this point, but the price of the unit was a fraction of what a couple hours of downtime could result in.
The pricing of this solution is ok, but I'm expecting that the price will decrease in the future.
The pricing of this solution is good, and it is one of the easiest things that you can sell Azure with.
The pricing of this solution is ok, but I'm expecting that the price will decrease in the future.
The pricing of this solution is good, and it is one of the easiest things that you can sell Azure with.
Technical support is pretty good. It is doing fine, but you pay for it.
Licensing can be either complicated or simple depending on what type of licensing you wish to use and what works best for your environment.
Technical support is pretty good. It is doing fine, but you pay for it.
Licensing can be either complicated or simple depending on what type of licensing you wish to use and what works best for your environment.
Oracle Data Guard is a feature available only in Oracle Database Enterprise Edition, and is available for extra cost.
It saves money and is cost-effective.
Oracle Data Guard is a feature available only in Oracle Database Enterprise Edition, and is available for extra cost.
It saves money and is cost-effective.
If you need to extend it, it can be extended acting like a normal Spectrum Protect with a long archive.
The licensing model of Spectrum Protect Plus is more efficient and cheaper compared to the original.
If you need to extend it, it can be extended acting like a normal Spectrum Protect with a long archive.
The licensing model of Spectrum Protect Plus is more efficient and cheaper compared to the original.
Cost could be lower.
NetApp Cloud Backup has a subscription-based model and it is paid annually.
Cost could be lower.
NetApp Cloud Backup has a subscription-based model and it is paid annually.
