Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Akamai App and API Protector Logo

Akamai App and API Protector pros and cons

Vendor: Akamai
4.2 out of 5

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Akamai App and API Protector is scalable and handles DDoS attacks efficiently, which is essential for fast-paced product deployment and infrastructure protection.
DDoS protection, customizable WAF features, and CDN efficiency are highlighted as some of the most valuable aspects of Akamai App and API Protector, enhancing web application security.
Charges for Akamai App and API Protector are usage-based, particularly beneficial for managing large volumes of Fully Qualified Domain Names (FQDNs) while keeping costs tied to actual traffic and labor for onboarding.
Custom rules capabilities cater to specialized client requirements, making Akamai App and API Protector adaptable for customized security projects.
Technical support from Akamai App and API Protector is noted for being responsive and helpful, providing significant assistance compared to other CDN providers.

CONS

Pushing configurations across a network has issues, taking about 20 minutes, and retracting requires another 20 minutes.
Pricing is considered high and could be reduced.
Customer support and documentation need improvement.
Akamai needs better application layer attack protection compared to competitors like Cloudflare.
Custom rules and analytics reporting could be improved for better visibility in the OEM console.
 

Akamai App and API Protector Pros review quotes

Security82ff - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Architect at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Mar 11, 2019
It is scalable for DDoS.
AC
CTO at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Aug 18, 2019
It enables us to move faster with new products because we have this layer of protection set up in our infrastructure.
it_user1266276 - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Cloud Security & DevSecOps at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
Jan 26, 2020
The most valuable feature is the DDoS protection, which is the main reason we got it.
Learn what your peers think about Akamai App and API Protector. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1362408 - PeerSpot reviewer
Solutions Architect, Cloud & SDDC at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Jun 8, 2020
The CDN and the WAF features are the best.
Neha Shakyawar - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Information at a leisure / travel company with 51-200 employees
Mar 29, 2021
The solution can scale extremely well.
YA
Co-Founder and CEO at PT Eugenea Kreasi Utama
Jan 10, 2024
The features are powerful and better than F5.
RB
Head of Infrastructure at AIA
Aug 10, 2021
I like that the charges are all based on usage and labor costs. For the time that we spend onboarding almost 252020 FQDN, Akamai charges us only for the traffic usage, but it's only charging us for the labor costs for onboarding.
CF
Senior Security Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Oct 7, 2021
The most valuable feature is the custom rules feature. This is because many of our customers require a lot of custom rules. Because it's a very customized project for our customers, I think they have the best of everything already.
reviewer1892376 - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Technologist at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
Jul 7, 2022
They have a fantastic tool for analyzing and viewing your traffic.
Bill Lee - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud Architecture Consultant at Metaage
Feb 23, 2023
The solution easily identifies, delays, or allows business traffic.
 

Akamai App and API Protector Cons review quotes

Security82ff - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Architect at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Mar 11, 2019
There are some issues with pushing configurations across a network. It still takes about 20 minutes and that means to retract it's another 20 minutes.
AC
CTO at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Aug 18, 2019
The WAF features definitely have a lot of room for improvement. A lot of the WAF is really basic. For some products or some of our solutions, we need to run a second layer of more advanced WAF. If it had better layer seven protection then we would not need a second WAF.
it_user1266276 - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Cloud Security & DevSecOps at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
Jan 26, 2020
The interface is a little bit clunky and can be improved.
Learn what your peers think about Akamai App and API Protector. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1362408 - PeerSpot reviewer
Solutions Architect, Cloud & SDDC at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Jun 8, 2020
Could integrate more features for each security.
Neha Shakyawar - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Information at a leisure / travel company with 51-200 employees
Mar 29, 2021
The pricing could be reduced a bit.
YA
Co-Founder and CEO at PT Eugenea Kreasi Utama
Jan 10, 2024
Support and the pricing need to improve.
RB
Head of Infrastructure at AIA
Aug 10, 2021
It would be better if there weren't any issues with latency. We had latency issues, but I think they are all solved now.
CF
Senior Security Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Oct 7, 2021
They are already very flexible, but room for improvement is there. Reports generation could be better and should be improved.
reviewer1892376 - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Technologist at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
Jul 7, 2022
It's fine for a simple tool, but as I recall, if you encounter a lot of bots, scrapers, and other things, you'll need this tool bot and this other thing they offer called Bot Manager.
Bill Lee - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud Architecture Consultant at Metaage
Feb 23, 2023
The solution could offer even more integrations.