Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

AppDynamics helps in quickly finding solutions for specific business transactions and has comprehensive monitoring capabilities that go beyond just servers to business processes.
It provides essential features like the Business Journey dashboard, end-user monitoring, and transaction tracing that are geared towards enhancing user experience and operational efficiency.
Strong support for multiple technologies and third-party applications like NoSQL, Kafka, and Couchbase, which facilitates extensive performance and health monitoring of various systems.
AppDynamics is praised for its ease of implementation, good documentation, and stability, making it a reliable choice for future long-term use and scaling in large organizations.
Offers valuable insights into application code, database insights, and transaction performance, proving highly useful in capacity planning and overall enterprise monitoring across different platforms.

CONS

AppDynamics needs more integration with application suites like Oracle Enterprise Server or BMC Remedy.
There could be improvement in the performance monitoring and impacts when deploying database agents on the database server.
AppDynamics lacks cloud technology integration and may not fit emerging enterprises moving to the cloud.
The end-user monitoring complexities and lack of template designs make it challenging to understand and implement changes quickly.
AppDynamics requires extra setup and extensions for various hardware, making installation and configuration more challenging.
 

AppDynamics Pros review quotes

SeniorSofcae - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 13, 2019
In AppDynamics, everywhere I go, there's some sort of grouping and aggregation function, or there's some sort of timeline that lets me zero in more quickly on the traces that I need. They go to more pains to aggregate and bubble the important ones to the top. That removes a lot of manual work.
reviewer1555236 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 19, 2021
The SAP monitoring element is very helpful.
it_user560520 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 24, 2016
It allows us to configure health rules so that we can, based on our own experience, determine when an application is behaving incorrectly.
Learn what your peers think about AppDynamics. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user560499 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 2, 2017
The most valuable feature is the live reporting on the current health\performance of our application
it_user560490 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 7, 2016
The flow map is very valuable to us. Before we installed APM, we had no idea how our application looked.
it_user560529 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 14, 2016
That visual representation’s been really good, also the overhead that AppDynamics creates is quite small. We've tried Dynatrace in the past. Some of the applications didn't work as well with Dynatrace.
Chandan-Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 13, 2023
Technical support is helpful.
it_user560355 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 1, 2016
The transaction snapshots let you find out where the application broke; it pinpoints where in the call stack, and then how long it took to resolve.
Yacin  HATTAB - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 22, 2022
The initial setup is simple.
reviewer1112805 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 17, 2021
The solution helps us save a lot of time on certain tasks.
 

AppDynamics Cons review quotes

SeniorSofcae - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 13, 2019
I would like to see something that lets me set real dollar figures, not just to outages, but to the solutions as well... when I'm looking at problems and have found a problem that I know I need to address. I could flag it off and have AppDynamics estimate how long a person would have taken to find that without it. That would give me a lot of leverage for justifying the existence of APM, which I really need.
reviewer1555236 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 19, 2021
The cost element is an issue. I can't expect the company to change its way of work. However, given the fact that we earn and do all our business in South African Rand, I would prefer to buy in Rand as opposed to the American dollar or British pound.
it_user560499 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 2, 2017
I think I would like to see a better way to deploy and upgrade the machine agents that we use. Currently, we have to use SCCM, and that might just be our environment with the customer.
Learn what your peers think about AppDynamics. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
823,795 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user560490 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 7, 2016
I would like to see more of a unified platform. They're very, very new on the server side, machine agents. I want them to be more mature in this area.
Chandan-Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 13, 2023
If it can be able to intelligently provide all the things we need to look at, from a data point of view, that would be very useful.
it_user560355 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 1, 2016
We would love to see support for more types of agents in the mainframe world.
Yacin  HATTAB - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 22, 2022
If AppDynamics could do a one-agent function with their actual monitoring effectiveness, it will be the greatest tool.
reviewer1112805 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 17, 2021
The cloud licensing needs to be improved. It's quite pricey.
DG
May 19, 2021
There are too many installers available for this solution.
it_user560487 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 9, 2016
It could be a little more flexible in configuration on the back end.