Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Access PeopleXD vs MHR iTrent comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Access PeopleXD
Ranking in Benefits Administration
30th
Average Rating
3.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Talent Management (47th), Expense Management (27th), HR Analytics Software (12th)
MHR iTrent
Ranking in Benefits Administration
18th
Average Rating
4.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Cloud HCM (24th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Benefits Administration category, the mindshare of Access PeopleXD is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MHR iTrent is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Benefits Administration
 

Featured Reviews

GM
Nov 4, 2021
Has many features in need of improvement, including its monitoring, interface, dashboard and technical support
We use the solution for employee and manager services and person management and employee records. When it comes to talent management, we utilize it for gauging the potential of the employee. We use it for succession planning.  The solution has many areas in need of improvement. I cannot cite just…
SB
Aug 8, 2023
A scalable solution with good functionalities, but customer support needs to improve
We use the whole integrated payroll HR system. I'm more on the payroll side. They do not host us, but we host ourselves MHR iTrent's functionality and the payroll part are good. It was all set up before I started. Customer support and getting help from MHR iTrent are not great at all. MHR iTrent…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is stable."
"MHR iTrent's functionality and the payroll part are good."
"The retrospection feature within iTrent is really good and better than what some other software provides. It's really useful."
 

Cons

"The solution has many areas in need of improvement, including management, monitoring, interface, dashboard and technical support."
"MHR's customer service needs to improve. It's dreadful at the moment. They're not very customer-focused."
"Customer support and getting help from MHR iTrent are not great at all."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Benefits Administration solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
19%
Computer Software Company
17%
Government
8%
Media Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about MHR iTrent?
MHR iTrent's functionality and the payroll part are good.
What needs improvement with MHR iTrent?
I'm not particularly happy with it if I'm being honest. But that is more due to the service provided by MHR rather than the software iTrent. I would like to improve the customer service in particul...
What is your primary use case for MHR iTrent?
We use it as an integrated HR payroll system. Any queries regarding the system not doing what it should are usually about the service provided by MHR—the customer service, the responses, and cases ...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

CoreTalent, CoreHR Compensation and Benefits, CoreHR CoreExpense
MidlandHR iTrent, iTrent
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bromford, Mercer, Novartis, Liberty Insurance, DCU
Brighton and Hove City Council, Cafcass, Capel Manor College, Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS, City and Islington College, City West Housing, Coventry University, Denbighshire County Council, Dudley College, Dyfed Powys Police Force, East Durham College
Find out what your peers are saying about Workday, Oracle, SAP and others in Benefits Administration. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.