Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Actional vs Mezmo comparison

Aurea and Mezmo are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Aurea is ranked #97, while Mezmo is ranked #76. Aurea holds a 0.0% mindshare in APM, compared to Mezmo’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Aurea users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Mezmo users who would recommend it.
Actional
Read 2 Actional reviews
  • 109 Views
  • 59 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Mezmo
Read 2 Mezmo reviews
  • 202 Views
  • 115 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Actional and Mezmo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Actional vs. Mezmo Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Actional vs. Mezmo
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,270 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Actional
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
97th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
SOA Governance (8th)
Mezmo
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
76th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (54th), Observability Pipeline Software (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Actional is 0.0%, down from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mezmo is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

it_user690762 - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides speed and scaling in the cloud
Provides speed and scaling in the cloud Effortless scaling Never throws away data Takes action now Delivers analytics at the speed of business Automates and speeds up system discovery I would like to see better marketing. We have used this for four years. There are no deployment issues at this…
Read full review
TO
Has vastly increased our ability to reach SLA targets consistently
Scalability could be improved. We are using it through the IBM cloud deployment and on some of the data centers that are very heavily used, there is a significant lag in the event stream, sometimes 10, 15 minutes behind, which makes the RCA impossible. If an event hits but you don't have the information to look at it, then it's tricky. This is probably not an issue of the product itself, but more a deployment issue. There is something on the IBM side that needs some readjustment to make certain these lags don't happen too often. We now use other tools for back-up in that area. But if you really want to do SIEM type work, then that is an aspect that needs some improvement. It's hard to tell if it's the product or the IBM deployment of it. The user interface is really very productive interactively but for an additional feature, it would be nice if we somehow could encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team so that specific types of actions can be carried out quickly. In particular, when we deal with a customer issue, it may pertain to a particular transaction through the system and each transaction has a unique ID. It would be great if we could query that ID and request all transactions that pertain to a specific ID. For now, we need to find the events, then extract the ID. Once we have that, we can go through the UI to set up the query and filter it to give us a transaction. But it would be really nice if we could simply say, "Here's the ID. Give me all the transactions."
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
Datadog vs Mezmo Logo
Datadog vs Mezmo
Compared 58% of the time
Cribl vs Mezmo Logo
Cribl vs Mezmo
Compared 42% of the time
More Mezmo Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2025
Actional reportDownload Actional product report
Buyer's Guide
Cribl vs. Mezmo
April 2025
Mezmo reportDownload Mezmo product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
LogDNA
 

Overview

Actional (CX-Monitor) automatically discovers both systems and processes associated with your active customer journeys or applications and gives you real-time operational profiles and analysis of each system and process.
Aurea

Today’s enterprises must manage a massive amount of machine data. They require a platform that enables engineering teams to deliberately route and store structured and unstructured data for different teams with unique use cases. Legacy platforms weren’t made for this moment.
‍
Mezmo, formerly LogDNA, lets organizations ingest, process, route, analyze, and store all of their log data. Purpose-built for modern engineering teams—including developers, SREs, IT Operations, and Security Engineers—the Mezmo platform is trusted by thousands of companies for SaaS, cloud, and hybrid applications.

Mezmo
 

Sample Customers

Proximus, Air France-KLM, Barratt Developments, Freedom Mortgage
Instacart, Asics, Lime, Salesforce
Buyer's Guide
Actional vs. Mezmo
April 2025
Free Report: Actional vs. Mezmo
Find out what your peers are saying about Actional vs. Mezmo and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Actional vs. Mezmo report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.