Active Risk Manager and IBM OpenPages are competing products in the risk management category. IBM OpenPages has an edge in terms of feature set and performance, while Active Risk Manager is favored for pricing and support.
Features: Active Risk Manager provides risk identification, assessment tools noted for simplicity, and scalability. IBM OpenPages delivers extensive regulatory compliance capabilities, advanced analytics, and a feature-rich environment.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Active Risk Manager is known for straightforward deployment and strong customer service, enabling swift integration. IBM OpenPages offers premium support but has a more complex deployment that demands additional time and resources.
Pricing and ROI: Active Risk Manager offers a cost-effective setup, leading to quicker ROI realization, ideal for budget-conscious buyers. IBM OpenPages entails a higher initial cost but promises substantial ROI due to its extensive features and efficiency.
Active Risk Manager offers comprehensive risk management solutions tailored to knowledgeable professionals. It provides a structured platform to identify, assess, manage, and report risks effectively, enhancing decision-making and operational resilience.
Active Risk Manager addresses diverse business challenges with its robust features, supporting businesses in mitigating potential risks and maximizing opportunities. Known for its adaptability, it integrates seamlessly into business processes, helping organizations navigate complex risk landscapes. With its focus on proactive risk management, Active Risk Manager ensures that companies can anticipate and adapt to changing risks, thereby safeguarding their strategic objectives and daily operations.
What are the most important features of Active Risk Manager?Active Risk Manager is applied across industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, where it supports compliance and risk mitigation efforts. In finance, it helps manage strategic and operational risks, while healthcare uses it to address patient safety and data protection concerns. Manufacturing relies on it to ensure safety and supply chain resilience.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.