ActiveBatch by Redwood vs AuraQuantic comparison

ActiveBatch by Redwood and AuraQuantic are both solutions in the Process Automation category. ActiveBatch by Redwood is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.5, while AuraQuantic is ranked #18 with an average rating of 10.0. ActiveBatch by Redwood holds a 0.6% mindshare in PA, compared to AuraQuantic’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ActiveBatch by Redwood users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AuraQuantic users who would recommend it.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Read 35 ActiveBatch by Redwood reviews

664 Views
231 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AuraQuantic

Read 6 AuraQuantic reviews

347 Views
238 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ActiveBatch by Redwood

AuraQuantic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

AuraQuantic and ActiveBatch by Redwood are competing products in the process automation and workload automation markets, respectively. AuraQuantic seems to have the upper hand in terms of ease of use and deployment speed, while ActiveBatch is more robust in its automation capabilities.

Features: AuraQuantic offers user-friendly low-code application development, process modeling flexibility, and comprehensive deployment options. ActiveBatch by Redwood provides powerful scheduling features, extensive integration capabilities, and a centralized automation hub that supports complex workflows.

Room for Improvement: AuraQuantic could enhance its initial setup documentation, offer more advanced workflow customization options, and improve its mobile interface design. ActiveBatch might improve its user interface for non-technical users, simplify its onboarding process, and streamline its integration with some outdated systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AuraQuantic's cloud-based platform offers quicker deployment and strong customer support that facilitates seamless integration with existing systems. ActiveBatch requires a more complex initial setup but provides detailed technical support designed for complex IT environments.

Pricing and ROI: AuraQuantic provides competitive pricing with attractive ROI due to its reduced setup time and operational efficiency. ActiveBatch, despite higher initial setup costs, justifies its price with superior long-term automation efficiencies and detailed workflow management features.

To learn more, read our detailed ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. AuraQuantic Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. AuraQuantic

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,625 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Ranking in Process Automation

5th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT) (6th), Workload Automation (4th)

AuraQuantic

Ranking in Process Automation

18th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (21st), Low-Code Development Platforms (17th), No-Code Development Platforms (6th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AuraQuantic is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Shubham Bharti

Senior Analyst at Capgemini

Flexible, easy to use, and offers good automation

Occasionally, I find myself contemplating if there is room for improvement in the user interface (UI), and envisioning that with certain enhancements. The UI could potentially offer a more refined and user-friendly experience, fostering smoother interactions and facilitating easier navigation for users engaging with the application. New users might encounter a minor setback due to the absence of readily accessible training videos, which could have otherwise proven to be an invaluable resource in aiding their initial familiarization with the platform, potentially hindering their seamless onboarding process and delaying their ability to harness the software's full range of capabilities to its utmost potential.

Read full review

Emilio Valle

Programmer at Banco de Guatemala

Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable

It helped a lot when we started using it with more images. Before, it was basic. With images, it's more effective. Users consider it more animated and user-friendly. We can easily track a process and know exactly where a process is. It's a low-code application. The solution is very easy to use. It is stable and reliable. The solution scales well. Technical support is extremely responsive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the most valuable features is the job templates. If we need to create an FTP job, we just drag over the FTP template and fill out the requirements using the variables that ActiveBatch uses. And that makes it reusable. We can create a job once but use it for many different clients."

"Using this tool, if there are any huge failures, we immediately get an email notification, and the proper team will be informed, at which time they can act accordingly."

"By implementing a sophisticated scheduling mechanism, the system allows for the precise triggering of jobs at user-selected frequencies, enabling a seamless and automated execution of tasks according to specified time intervals."

"What ActiveBatch allows you to do is develop a more efficient process. It gave me visibility into all my jobs so I could choose which jobs to run in parallel. This is much easier than when I have to try to do it through cron for Windows XP, where you really can't do things in parallel and know what is going on."

"The product offers a centralized platform for managing activities across many environments, applications, etc."

"There are hundreds of pre-built steps."

"The REST API adapters and native integrations for integrating and orchestrating the software stack are very flexible."

"Since we are no longer waiting for an operator to see that a job is finished, we have changed our daily cycle from running in eight hours down to about five. We had a third shift-operator retire and that position was never refilled."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood pros

"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."

"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."

"AuraPortal has the best price for its process."

"It's a low-code application."

Cons

"As more organizations are moving towards a cloud-based infrastructure, ActiveBatch could incorporate more capabilities that support popular cloud platforms, such as AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud."

"Some of the advanced features in the user interface are a bit confusing even after referring to the documents."

"Except for the GUI, everything looks good."

"An area for improvement in ActiveBatch Workload Automation is its interface or GUI. It could be a little better. There isn't any additional feature I'd like to see in the tool, except for the GUI, everything looks good."

"Between version 10 and version 12 there was a change. In version 10, they had each object in its own folder. But on the back end, they saw it at the root level. So when we moved over to version 12, everything was in the same area mixed together. It was incredibly difficult and we actually had to create our own folders and move those objects—like schedules, jobs, user accounts—and manually put those into folders, whereas the previous version already had it."

"They could provide an easier installation guide or technical support to the organizations during the installation process."

"A nice thing to have would be the ability to comfortably pass variables from one job to another. That was one of the things that I found difficult."

"One thing I've noticed is that navigation can be difficult unless you are familiar with the structure that we have in place. If someone else had to look at our ActiveBatch console and find a job, they might not know where to find it."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood cons

"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."

"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."

"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."

"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."

"I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."

"It allows for lower operational overhead."

"If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."

"The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."

"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."

"I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."

"Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."

"The price could be better. It's quite expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

Managing the workload and monitoring the tasks were very difficult with manual interventions. Now, by using ActiveBatch, the process is automated and it runs tasks on a scheduled basis.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

I'd advise users to start by knowing what the actual requirement is and thoroughly assess the automation needs. New users should take advantage of the demos and trial versions so they get an idea o...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

After upgrades we are facing a few issues and errors triggered, so focusing on this would be appreciated. Some of the advanced features in the user interface are a bit confusing even after referrin...

See all answers

What do you like most about AuraQuantic?

It's a low-code application.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AuraQuantic?

I do not handle the licensing. I do not have direct knowledge of the pricing. It's not within the scope of my work.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AuraQuantic?

We're just using images. We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example. There could be more adoptions. We'd like the option to connect this product with oth...

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 20% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 18% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 14% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 10% of the time

Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

More ActiveBatch by Redwood Competitors

Appian vs AuraQuantic

Compared 53% of the time

Camunda vs AuraQuantic

Compared 28% of the time

Bizagi vs AuraQuantic

Compared 19% of the time

More AuraQuantic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood

April 2025

Download ActiveBatch by Redwood product report

Buyer's Guide

AuraQuantic

April 2025

Download AuraQuantic product report

Also Known As

ActiveBatch

No data available

Overview

ActiveBatch by Redwood automates and manages batch processes, data integration tasks, and workflow scheduling. It's used for file transfers, data processing, server monitoring, and report generation, supporting both on-prem and cloud environments.

Organizations implement ActiveBatch by Redwood to automate complex job scheduling and data workflows, integrating seamlessly with FTP, SQL, PowerShell, and other systems. With features like real-time monitoring, error handling, and centralized management, users can significantly boost productivity while minimizing manual intervention. Its flexibility in supporting on-premises and cloud environments makes it adaptable for diverse IT landscapes. The tool simplifies workflow orchestration with an extensive library of pre-built steps and robust API integrations, ensuring efficiency in handling various workloads.

What are ActiveBatch by Redwood's key features?

Job automation: Automates routine and complex jobs.
Real-time monitoring: Offers instant insights into job performance.
Customizable workflows: Tailors workflows to specific business needs.
PowerShell integration: Supports advanced script execution.
Job triggering: Initiates tasks based on specific conditions.
File handling: Manages file transfers and processing efficiently.
Server management: Monitors and handles server tasks consistently.
API integration: Connects with various applications for streamlined operations.
Alerting: Provides notifications for critical job events.
Flexible scheduling: Enables detailed and adaptable job scheduling.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Centralized management: Simplifies oversight of all processes.
Productivity boost: Reduces manual effort and errors.
Time savings: Accelerates task completion and workflow execution.
Comprehensive visibility: Enhances monitoring of all job activities.
Reliable performance: Ensures consistent task execution.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business and IT needs.

In various industries, ActiveBatch by Redwood is used to streamline operations, whether in finance handling large-scale data processing, healthcare managing patient records, or retail optimizing supply chains. It addresses specific needs by offering robust automation, efficient job scheduling, and seamless integration with existing systems, driving operational excellence and efficiency.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

AuraQuantic is a digital platform designed for business users to easily and rapidly build unlimited processes and applications to automate end-to-end operations, reducing costs and optimizing productivity.

AuraQuantic is a no-code platform for building the enterprise solutions that drive Digital Transformation.

Interface

Delight users with attractive interfaces across multiple devices and deliver the best user experience. Respond immediately to their ever-changing needs with the agility provided by the platform and its no-code changes on the fly.

Logic

This is the most powerful part of any application. This is why AuraQuantic offers a long list of built-in, no-code functionalities.

Data

To manage application and process data models, AuraQuantic provides a visual data model designer and supports importing data schemas.

Application Governance

Access rights management (to apps and app development), Application metadata collection, Application performance monitoring, Application works dashboard, Custom ‘guardrails’ for practitioners/developers, Role-based access control to data and services for app dev, Multiple practitioners/developers for a single app and across the platform.

Business Analytics

Digital Decisioning features aim to inform and automate operational decisions. These decisions continue to increase in amount and complexity due to growing customer demands. Business decision automation is a must to keep up with ever-changing customer needs.

Thanks to business activity data collection, using custom applications built with AuraQuantic, the organization is empowered to carry out accurate analysis and act smart by leveraging business insights.

Connectivity

API REST, API SOAP, API DLL
Exposing APIs (process/application logic and decision systems)
Connector builder
REST and SOAP web services connector
External database connectors (Adapters Servers, scripts and stored procedures execution)
.Net Assembly connector Connectors with Artificial Intelligence services (AI)
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) service connectors
More built-in connectors (50+)
Microsoft Office 365, Google Suite, SAP…

AuraQuantic

Sample Customers

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital

Nissan, RSA Chile, New Millennia Group Plc (UK), TOYOTA, ArcelorMittal Brasil, KPN, Farmacia Luis Corbi, Farmacia del Paseo, Frutas Bean, IncAE Business School, BDO Argentina, Refinery of the Pacific, Balfego Grup, Fundacion Seneca, Technological Institute Maranosa, Coprusa Group, Constructec, University of Deusto, Tenco Shopping Centers, Spanish Railways Foundation, Arbora & Ausonia.

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. AuraQuantic

April 2025

Free Report: ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. AuraQuantic

Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. AuraQuantic and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,625 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. AuraQuantic report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.