Acunetix vs Kiuwan comparison

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

1,477 Views
1,177 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Acunetix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Acunetix and Kiuwan are prominent in web application security and code analysis, respectively. While Acunetix is recognized for its extensive scanning abilities, Kiuwan offers superior code insight, making it an all-around choice for diverse needs.

Features: Acunetix is noted for automatic scanning, vulnerability detection, and integration capabilities. Kiuwan stands out with in-depth code analysis, audit tools, and support for multiple coding languages.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix could enhance reporting features, scalability, and reporting detail. Kiuwan should focus on improving tool integration, enhancing integration flexibility, and broadening supported tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix offers a straightforward deployment process with supportive customer service. Conversely, Kiuwan ensures an easy deployment process backed by a proactive, responsive support team.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix involves higher upfront costs but offers strong ROI through continuous security enhancements. Kiuwan is cost-effective, providing substantial ROI via code quality improvements and lowered bug remediation costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: January 2025).

Download the complete report

Acunetix vs. Kiuwan

January 2025

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in Application Security Tools

16th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (22nd), DevSecOps (6th)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

29th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

25th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 2.6%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.0%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

AnubhavGoswami

Compliance Manager at Compunnel

Attractive automated reports with boost user productivity and an easy setup

The primary use is mainly related to vulnerability assessment, including both public and internal IP addresses By using this tool, we have reduced the workload and increased the productivity of users. It generates automated reports. This feature is beneficial when sharing reports with clients as…

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at Deloitte

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The usability and overall scan results are good."

"The vulnerability scanning option for analyzing the security loopholes on the websites is the most valuable feature of this solution."

"By integrating with CI/CD tools, it enables a shift-left approach in the development process."

"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."

"Overall, it's a very good tool and a very good engine."

"Their technical support has been very active. If I have an issue, I can reach out to them and get an answer pretty quick."

"I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention."

"The product is really easy to use."

More Acunetix pros

"We are using this solution to increase the quality of our software and to test the vulnerabilities in our tools before the customers find them."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report."

"Software analytics for a lot of different languages including ABAP."

"It provides value by offering options to enhance both code quality and the security of the company."

"I have found the security and QA in the source code to be most valuable."

"I personally like the way it breaks down security vulnerabilities with LoC at first glance."

"The feature that I have found the most valuable in Kiuwan is the speed of scanning. Compared to other SaaS tools I have used, Kiuwan is much quicker in performing scans. I have not yet used it on a large code base, but from what I have experienced, it is efficient and accurate. Additionally, I have used it both manually and in an automated pipeline, and both methods have been effective. The speed of scanning is what makes it valuable to me."

"I find it immensely helpful because it's not just about generating code; it's about ensuring efficiency in the execution."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"We want to see how much bandwidth usage it consumes. When we monitor traffic we have issues with the consumption and throttling of the traffic."

"The solution's pricing could be better."

"The only problem that they have is the price. It is a bit expensive, and you cannot change the number of applications for the whole year."

"The solution is generally stable, however, there might be room for improvement regarding glitches or bugs."

"Acunetix needs to include agent analysis."

"The jargon used makes it difficult for project managers to understand the issues, and the technical explanations used make it difficult for developers to understand issues. These things should be simplified much more. That would be very helpful for us when explaining to them what needs to be fixed. The report output needs to be simplified."

"Integration into other tools is very limited for Acunetix. While we're trying to incorporate a CI/CD process where we're integrating with JIRA and we're integrating with Jenkins and Chef, it becomes problematic. Other tools give you a high integration capability to connect into different solutions that you may already have, like JIRA."

"There was an issue related to updates from the internet."

More Acunetix cons

"The development-to-delivery phase."

"It could improve its scalability abilities."

"Integration of the programming tools could be improved."

"I would like to see additional languages supported."

"I would like to see better integration with the Visual Studio and Eclipse IDEs."

"The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."

"The configuration hasn't been that good."

"The integration process could be improved. It'll also help if it could generate reports automatically. But I'm not sure about the effectiveness of the reports. This is because, in our last project, we still found some key issues that weren't captured by the Kiuwan report."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."

"The price is exceptionally high."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."

"The solution is expensive."

"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."

"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"Check with your account manager."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I use Acunetix for penetration testing purposes. This is the primary use case.

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I rate the overall solution nine out of ten. I prefer Acunetix for its more precise and accurate results.

What do you like most about Kiuwan?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kiuwan?

I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business...

What needs improvement with Kiuwan?

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 16% of the time

Compared 12% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Acunetix

Compared 10% of the time

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning vs Acunetix

Compared 7% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Acunetix

Compared 6% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Kiuwan

Compared 54% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 10% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 8% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Kiuwan

Compared 5% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Download Acunetix product report

Acunetix

February 2025

Download Kiuwan product report

February 2025

Also Known As

AcuSensor

No data available

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Invicti

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial