Adobe Digital Enterprise Platform vs IBM FileNet comparison

Adobe and IBM are both solutions in the Enterprise Content Management category. Adobe is ranked #30, while IBM is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. Adobe holds a 0.2% mindshare in ECM, compared to IBM’s 10.6% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution.

Adobe Digital Enterprise Pl...

72 Views
46 Comparison Views

IBM FileNet

Read 101 IBM FileNet reviews

3,588 Views
2,318 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Adobe Digital Enterprise Pl...

IBM FileNet

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Adobe Digital Enterprise Platform and IBM FileNet based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, IBM and others in Enterprise Content Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Content Management

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Digital Enterprise Pl...

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

30th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM FileNet

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

101

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Adobe Digital Enterprise Platform is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM FileNet is 10.6%, up from 9.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

Use Adobe Digital Enterprise Platform?

Share your opinion

Emad Rizki

System integrator at Indépendant

Facilitates seamless integration for large enterprises with strong deployment capabilities

FileNet was scalable and could be implemented into big multinational organizations. However, it has become very expensive recently. Compared to low-code solutions such as Appian and outsystems, FileNet has gaps, mainly because it requires coding, which is not preferred by clients due to pricing concerns in Pakistan. We transitioned clients to cloud solutions, although FileNet has been strongly integrated with on-prem deployments.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about IBM FileNet?

The product is robust and can process a lot of documents for enterprise content management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM FileNet?

The product has become more expensive and requires significant investment for enterprise solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM FileNet?

FileNet needs improvement in pricing as it has become very expensive. Also, in comparison to local solutions, the need for coding is a disadvantage.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

OpenText Extended ECM vs IBM FileNet

Compared 17% of the time

OpenText Documentum vs IBM FileNet

Compared 17% of the time

SharePoint vs IBM FileNet

Compared 15% of the time

Hyland OnBase vs IBM FileNet

Compared 9% of the time

Alfresco vs IBM FileNet

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM FileNet Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Content Management

February 2025

Adobe Digital Enterprise Platform report

Download Adobe Digital Enterprise Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM FileNet

March 2025

Download IBM FileNet product report

Also Known As

Digital Enterprise Platform

No data available

Overview

Adobe Digital Enterprise Platform (ADEP) provides a set of software, tools, and services for

building applications that can deliver engaging customer experiences across multiple digital
channels and devices.

Adobe

IBM FileNet is a leading IBM enterprise content management product family. IBM FileNet is one of the ECM solutions that can change the way a company does business by enabling users to capture, activate, socialize, analyze, and govern content throughout its lifecycle.

There are many IBM FileNet products available, all of which are integrated and based on the FileNet P8 Platform.

IBM

Sample Customers

Janus Health

Suncorp Group Limited, St. Vincent Health, Citigroup, SRCSD, and UK Dept for Work and Pensions.

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Content Management

February 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, IBM and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.