Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ADP Workforce Now vs Namely comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

ADP Workforce Now
Ranking in Benefits Administration
8th
Ranking in Talent Management
9th
Ranking in Cloud HCM
9th
Ranking in HR Analytics Software
3rd
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Namely
Ranking in Benefits Administration
27th
Ranking in Talent Management
39th
Ranking in Cloud HCM
42nd
Ranking in HR Analytics Software
11th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Cloud HCM category, the mindshare of ADP Workforce Now is 1.3%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Namely is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud HCM
 

Featured Reviews

Vineeth John - PeerSpot reviewer
May 21, 2024
Custom reporting tool with field grabber, easy modules for recruitment and provides numerous options for integration
The complexity is the key challenge with a tool like ADP because it has all the bells and whistles and all the key features you can possibly think of. If it isn't there, there's always a third-party vendor you can integrate that way. But the only issue is that because it's complex, there needs to be some sort of system, at least on the back end, for the admins to understand what leads to what. We expect AI to improve multiple things with HR processes. The most obvious and common one would be the self-service function for employees, like a chatbot to help with FAQs. We are also building an AI tool that can possibly help managers make better talent management decisions. This tool will pull from the performance management tool, the talent profile, and the reports that we generally have to score employees across all different dimensions.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I give the pricing a seven out of ten."
"The solution is expensive."
"It is expensive."
"I know some of what we're currently paying. Most customers would say it's too high, but I don't have a comparison to know that."
"The solution is expensive and everyone complains about the price."
"The pricing is expensive and I would say it is below average for the value it provides based on the high cost."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud HCM solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ADP Workforce Now?
The licensing is on the pricer side, given that there aren't a lot of other tools out there that are applicable, we just decided to go ahead with ADP anyway. I would definitely recommend ADP to oth...
What needs improvement with ADP Workforce Now?
The complexity is the key challenge with a tool like ADP because it has all the bells and whistles and all the key features you can possibly think of. If it isn't there, there's always a third-part...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Lawrence and Schiller, The Children's Center, The Kansas City Royals
The Motley Fool, Spongecell, TechnologyAdvice, Gyro, Central Oklahoma Family Medical Center, 1stdibs, Blue Apron, JW Player, The Motley Fool, Penton, Red Frog Events, VaynerMedia
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Workday, Oracle and others in Cloud HCM. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.