No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Aerospike Database vs Qubole Data Services comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aerospike Database
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
NoSQL Databases (11th)
Qubole Data Services
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Hadoop (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Aerospike Database and Qubole Data Services aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Aerospike Database is designed for NoSQL Databases and holds a mindshare of 3.4%, down 3.8% compared to last year.
Qubole Data Services, on the other hand, focuses on Hadoop, holds 3.8% mindshare, up 1.4% since last year.
NoSQL Databases Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Aerospike Database3.4%
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced13.7%
Redis9.1%
Other73.80000000000001%
NoSQL Databases
Hadoop Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Qubole Data Services3.8%
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop14.1%
HPE Data Fabric13.5%
Other68.6%
Hadoop
 

Featured Reviews

Manikandan Gunasekaran - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Engineering at Ola
Boost authentication and session management with reliable and fast data handling
There is a lot of technical debt in our company, and we need to update to the latest versions. The lack of automation in upgrading clusters from development to production is a concern. A tool for automatically handling such upgrades would reduce operational huddle. Additionally, it would be beneficial if Aerospike had a community version to encourage broader adoption and experimentation.
Use Qubole Data Services?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
885,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Government
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aerospike Database 7?
We use around half a TB of data and spend approximately $36,000 to $40,000 USD per year on Aerospike.
What needs improvement with Aerospike Database 7?
There is a lot of technical debt in our company, and we need to update to the latest versions. The lack of automation in upgrading clusters from development to production is a concern. A tool for a...
What is your primary use case for Aerospike Database 7?
Aerospike is mainly used as the first step for authentication, authorization, and session persistence in our organization. It is a critical part of our workflow, as without it, we wouldn't be able ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
QDS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AppNexus, Adform, KAYAK, Williams-Sonoma Inc., The Trade Desk, GREE, BlueKai, Chango CTO, InMobi, Yashi, eXelate CTO, Snapdeal, adMarketplace, Tapad, Komli Media, Neustar, So-net Media Networks, IMHO Vi, Vizury
Ola Cabs, GetSmart, AdIQuity, Glossom, Station X, Indix, TA telecom, bloomreach, Universal Music Group, Videoplaza, Sokrati, Flipboard, DEMAND BASE, Black Book, ImplementHIT, Answers.com, DataXu, DataLogix, Under Armour Connected Fitness, Quantdeck, Capillary, PubMatic, YouGov, Quora, Insightera, Komli Media, Pinterest, MediaMath, yieldr, TubeMogul, Saavn, Merkle, Nextdoor
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Microsoft, Couchbase and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: March 2026.
885,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.