Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AlgoSec vs Tufin Orchestration Suite comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.6
AlgoSec enhances visibility, reduces workload, improves security, optimizes firewall management, and justifies cost by delivering quick ROI.
Sentiment score
6.9
Tufin Orchestration Suite enhances efficiency and agility in firewall management, reducing time and errors while increasing productivity.
The Orchestration Suite saves time when implementing rules.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.2
AlgoSec's customer service is fast and helpful, with generally positive feedback but some inconsistency in technical support for complex cases.
Sentiment score
8.6
<p>Tufin's customer service is praised for responsive, knowledgeable support staff, effectively solving complex issues with overseas R&amp;D involvement.</p>
The support team is effective; they connect to the network quickly and help resolve any issues that arise.
The team is eager to help in fixing issues.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.8
AlgoSec is scalable, flexible, and integrates well, supporting numerous devices and improving cloud deployment capabilities with ongoing enhancements.
Sentiment score
6.2
Tufin Orchestration Suite is scalable, managing numerous devices efficiently, with licensing flexibility aiding diverse network environments.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
AlgoSec is highly regarded for its stability, user-friendliness, and prompt bug fixes, with minimal major disruptions reported.
Sentiment score
8.3
Tufin Orchestration Suite is stable and reliable, with occasional issues, quickly addressed by responsive developers, suiting most users.
 

Room For Improvement

AlgoSec needs improvements in reporting, integration, cloud capabilities, UI, support, customization, performance, automation, API, and user experience.
Tufin Orchestration Suite needs improvements in integration, customization, UI, cloud compatibility, automation, support, and performance.
AlgoSec should support in identifying most hit rules and re-ordering existing firewall rules - this is a very key to manage firewall CPU.
Issues can arise in larger enterprises, particularly concerning policy-based forwarding and NAT traffic.
The design needs improvement, particularly in recognizing target devices and target files.
 

Setup Cost

AlgoSec offers flexible pricing with high costs, justified by ROI, but demands careful financial planning for optimal use.
Tufin Orchestration Suite pricing is often seen as high, with complex licensing models, varying by company size and needs.
The pricing of Orchestration Suite is high, which is a point for improvement.
Tufin and AlgoSec are at the same level in terms of pricing.
 

Valuable Features

AlgoSec's key features optimize security through policy automation, risk analysis, compliance support, and seamless multi-vendor integration.
Tufin Orchestration Suite offers unified security management, automation, compliance tools, extensive reporting, and supports multiple vendor integrations for enhanced visibility.
AlgoSec auto implementation came into the picture, which helped the right departments to approve policies and implementations.
New employees can quickly grasp the various IPs, devices, and the network's logical and physical layout within a short period.
It offers automation capabilities that are very helpful, especially for network security orchestration and applying policies.
 

Categories and Ranking

AlgoSec
Ranking in Firewall Security Management
1st
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
182
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tufin Orchestration Suite
Ranking in Firewall Security Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
183
Ranking in other categories
Container Security (28th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of AlgoSec is 21.6%, up from 20.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tufin Orchestration Suite is 21.7%, up from 21.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Firewall Security Management
 

Featured Reviews

YUKTHIKUMAR K - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhances security with effective identification of unused and risky rules
There should be improvements in the analysis between internal zones, such as internal to DMZ or guest to DMZ. These scenarios should be considered critical and enhancements should be made, even if the risk score is set high. Improvements are also needed in the area of PCI, specifically the PCI controller.
Amroy Lumban Gaol - PeerSpot reviewer
A flexible, very secure solution that works well in Layer 2 environments
Integration for Layer 2 devices could be improved because it requires manual scripting. Other layers are very simple to integrate. It would be a benefit to have a form field for firewall names, user names, and passwords which then auto integrate. Licensing options are confusing and require additional fees for high availability. Competitors include high availability with their standard licenses.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Energy/Utilities Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AlgoSec?
AlgoSec's ability to integrate with various security and networking solutions enhances its overall value.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AlgoSec?
I am into operations and not aware of cost or pricing.
What needs improvement with AlgoSec?
AlgoSec is slow when it is loaded with too many firewalls and policies. A plan to take care of heavy usage is to be considered. Support of all firewalls and policy features to be enabled. AlgoSec s...
What do you like most about Tufin?
The most valuable feature of Tufin is security auditing. We are able to check the rules and compliance of the company, for example, what is allowed or not. We are able to check the rules over diffe...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tufin?
Tuffin is expensive, and we have to explain to our customers the benefit for them to purchase. If we explain the benefits in the correct way they do not mind the price. We typically do costing for ...
What needs improvement with Tufin?
The reporting function could improve in Tufin. For our clients with companies that have strong compliance, reporting privacy data is mostly a problem. In the IT department, private data needs a fun...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Tufin SecureCloud
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Maersk, Delta Airlines, Chevron, General Motors, T-Mobile, Chevron, AT&T, BP, Bell Canada, HCA Healthcare, Morgan Stanley, Unilever, Nationwide Insurance Enterprise, US Bank, Microsoft 
3M, AT&T, Blue Cross Blue Shield, BNP Parabas, ConocoPhillips, Deutsche Bank, GE, IBM, Pfizer, United States Postal Service 
Find out what your peers are saying about AlgoSec vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.