Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Alluvio AppResponse vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager comparison

Riverbed and IBM are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Riverbed is ranked #47 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #55 with an average rating of 6.0. Riverbed holds a 0.2% mindshare in APM, compared to IBM’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of IBM users who would recommend it.
Alluvio AppResponse
Read 17 Alluvio AppResponse reviews
  • 436 Views
  • 273 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...
Read 2 IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager reviews
  • 565 Views
  • 334 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and Alluvio AppResponse are both powerful application management tools. Alluvio AppResponse is often seen as superior due to its feature set, making users feel it's worth the price despite higher costs.

What features are offered by IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to Alluvio AppResponse?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager offers comprehensive monitoring, deep diagnostic capabilities, and robust feature sets. Alluvio AppResponse provides excellent network and application performance monitoring, detailed reporting features, and superior data analysis.

What areas of improvement can be found in IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to Alluvio AppResponse?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager could improve its integration capabilities, simplify its configuration process, and address its complex setup. Alluvio AppResponse users desire better customer support, a more intuitive setup process, and enhanced deployment practices.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to Alluvio AppResponse?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager's deployment is seen as more complex and time-consuming. Alluvio AppResponse is valued for easier deployment despite its need for improved customer support. Users find the initial setup for Alluvio AppResponse more straightforward.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to Alluvio AppResponse?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is highlighted for better pricing and perceived value for money, resulting in a quicker return on investment. Alluvio AppResponse is considered expensive, but users acknowledge its comprehensive features justify the cost, though the ROI takes longer to realize.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Alluvio AppResponse vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Alluvio AppResponse vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Alluvio AppResponse
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
47th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (60th)
IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
55th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
4.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Alluvio AppResponse is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Ahmet Kilic - PeerSpot reviewer
It's a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility at all levels
I rate Alluvio AppResponse 10 out of 10. If you work for a financial company especially, you probably face problems on the application side. The problem is easy to identify, but you need to determine the root cause. You can solve issues easily via AppResponse because it shows you all the details of your transactions so you can see the real problem in the database, network, software, etc. For example, you can find the solution easily if you create the right dashboard on your site. If you can't find the problem, you can observe or investigate PCAP.
Read full review
CC
Integrates well with IBM technologies, but it's outdated and lacks essential features
Implementing synthetic monitoring for our Internet banking site has been challenging. The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively. I have concerns about the complexity of the tool and the challenges in managing it effectively. The support provided is not satisfactory, and the specialists available lack sufficient training and expertise in using the tool.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"AppResponse is a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility into applications at all levels, from Layer 1 to Layer 7. We can trace all those sections: physical, IP, transport, presentation, application, etc. It gives us the full picture."
"With some APM solutions, it can take a long time to check a periodic report, but you can get all the necessary details quickly with AppResponse."
"The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance."
"The most valuable feature is performance monitoring."
"I have found the AppResponse, which is a packet capture solution, very good. It gives you the ability to drill down back in time. You've got all the packets there. You can troubleshoot it later, not immediately. It's very interesting."
"When it comes to the ability to scale up the product, this is suitable for small medium and large environments,"
"It provides us with complete visibility of every packet."
"Ability to see end to end user, application, server, and network response time and throughput data."
More Alluvio AppResponse pros
"IBM's main value lies in its integration with its own technologies, which can be seen as a benefit in environments where IBM products are extensively used."
"The solution is very stable. We never had any issues with stability."
 

Cons

"Technical support needs to be more responsive."
"The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually."
"Need to bring back the NetFlow module for AppResponse."
"The initial setup is straightforward, but you have to know a little about the product. It's not for everybody to just plug and play. If you know how the solution is implemented then it is straightforward."
"The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality."
"The AI features should be addressed in respect of the analysis and intelligence that must be supported and delivered in the tool to predigest the large amounts of data."
"Alluvio AppResponse should improve its ability to expand across multiple operating systems."
"Integration between NPM and APM solutions would improve efficiency. There is no agent on the server site related to AppResponse."
More Alluvio AppResponse cons
"The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively."
"The user interface was not good."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is costly for small and medium businesses."
"The solution is no more expensive than other products."
"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."
"The price is a little bit high, especially because we have to pay an import tax."
"I would rate the pricing a nine to ten. It is very expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Insurance Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
41%
Computer Software Company
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The pricing of Riverbed Alluvio AppResponse is really high. Very few customers buy Riverbed because many do not have the sufficient budget. Its pricing is comparatively higher than SolarWinds. Rive...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually. Additionally, a feature similar to SolarWinds AppStack, which provides a holistic view of the i...
See all answers
What do you like most about IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager?
IBM's main value lies in its integration with its own technologies, which can be seen as a benefit in environments where IBM products are extensively used.
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager?
Implementing synthetic monitoring for our Internet banking site has been challenging. The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager?
I would rate IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager a six out of ten. The monitoring tool we currently use is outdated and lacks essential features for monitoring customer experience. We face lim...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 31% of the time
LogicMonitor vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
LogicMonitor vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 25% of the time
Nagios XI vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
Nagios XI vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 23% of the time
OP5 Monitor vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
OP5 Monitor vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 21% of the time
More Alluvio AppResponse Competitors
Dynatrace vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
Dynatrace vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 29% of the time
IBM Instana Observability vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
IBM Instana Observability vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 21% of the time
Azure Monitor vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
Azure Monitor vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 18% of the time
Catchpoint vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
Catchpoint vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 16% of the time
IBM Application Performance Management vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
IBM Application Performance Management vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 16% of the time
More IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2025
Alluvio AppResponse reportDownload Alluvio AppResponse product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2025
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager reportDownload IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager product report
 

Also Known As

Riverbed AppResponse, OPNET SteelCentral AppResponse, ACE Live, OPNET, AppResponse Xpert
Tivoli Composite Application Manager
 

Overview

Alluvio AppResponse provides fast packet capture and storage that feeds intelligent network and application analysis with fast troubleshooting workflows to speed problem diagnosis and resolution. AppResponse delivers full stack application analysis—from packets to web pages - enabling you observe all network and application interactions as they cross the wire, whether they are encrypted or not. Using powerful, flexible network and application analytics and workflows, AppResponse speeds problem diagnosis and resolution, helping you get to answers fast

Riverbed
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for Application Diagnostics on z/OS manages real-time problem detection, analysis, and repair to help maintain the availability, performance and general health of on-demand composite applications. it can gain in-depth diagnostic information for specific application requests to identify the root cause of problems. This software provides a consistent way to manage composite applications throughout Java EE application environments. Set alerts to help detect and fix potentially troublesome situations before they affect users. It can resolve performance issues faster and reduce downtime costs.
IBM
 

Sample Customers

N11.com, OneMain Financial, China Bank, Halkbank, Kaust
Michelin Tire Corp
Buyer's Guide
Alluvio AppResponse vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
April 2025
Free Report: Alluvio AppResponse vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Find out what your peers are saying about Alluvio AppResponse vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Alluvio AppResponse vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.