IBM Application Performance Management vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager comparison

IBM Application Performance Management and IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. IBM Application Performance Management is ranked #58 with an average rating of 6.0, while IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is ranked #59 with an average rating of 6.0. IBM Application Performance Management holds a 0.4% mindshare in APM, compared to IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 62% of IBM Application Performance Management users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager users who would recommend it.

IBM Application Performance...

Read 7 IBM Application Performance Management reviews

1,057 Views
687 Comparison Views

62% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Read 2 IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager reviews

693 Views
430 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

IBM Application Performance...

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and IBM Application Performance Management compete in the application performance management sector. Users find IBM Application Performance Management superior due to its advanced features and overall value despite IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager's strengths in pricing and support.

What features are offered by IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to IBM Application Performance Management?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager offers strong application monitoring, problem identification capabilities, and cost-effectiveness. IBM Application Performance Management excels with detailed analytics, proactive issue resolution, and more insightful analytics tools.

What areas of improvement can be found in IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to IBM Application Performance Management?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager requires a more modern approach to visual data representation, enhanced integration capabilities, and more modern aesthetics. IBM Application Performance Management can improve its integration with third-party tools, streamline its deployment process, and enhance the user interface for better usability.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to IBM Application Performance Management?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is recognized for its straightforward deployment process but has mixed reviews on customer support. IBM Application Performance Management has a slightly more complex deployment but is praised for its exceptional customer support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to IBM Application Performance Management?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is cost-effective with decent ROI. IBM Application Performance Management, though higher in cost, delivers significant value and better ROI due to its comprehensive feature set and value delivery.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Application Performance Management vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Application Performance Management vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

IBM Application Performance...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

58th

Average Rating

6.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

59th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of IBM Application Performance Management is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Daniel Tamiru

Manager, Database & System Administration at Awash International Bank

A multi-functional solution but has poor stability and performance-related issues

We are using version 4 of IBM Application Performance Management, and it is deployed on-premises. We use it for internet banking and mainly for application performance on-site. For example, if we face performance-related issues in one of our software or managed services, we use this solution to…

Read full review

Christian Campos

Sales manager at Prodeo Innovation

Integrates well with IBM technologies, but it's outdated and lacks essential features

Implementing synthetic monitoring for our Internet banking site has been challenging. The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively. I have concerns about the complexity of the tool and the challenges in managing it effectively. The support provided is not satisfactory, and the specialists available lack sufficient training and expertise in using the tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's easy to use."

"The transaction tracking feature from IBM is the most important feature for us. It is something that provides a terrific value for us and our clients. It has a lot of data sources and agents that are collectors. It is also stable."

"Because we have partnerships with other partners, I can share a bit about what I've noticed with IBM APM compared to other vendor solutions. Specifically, with IBM, the visibility into detailed process information is more tangible. On the OS level, APM displays all processes (or the top 10 processes) that are consuming CPU or resident memory. This is the most important thing that is not always available with other vendors."

"IBM Application Performance Management helped us increased our response time by 80% and cost 60% less."

"I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten."

"The most valuable feature is the breakdown that it provides, such as a description of the fields for a particular transaction."

"The initial setup was straightforward and took minimal effort."

"IBM's main value lies in its integration with its own technologies, which can be seen as a benefit in environments where IBM products are extensively used."

"The solution is very stable. We never had any issues with stability."

Cons

"Its web user interface is a little bit old in comparison to other solutions, such as New Relic, and it should be improved. Its scalability and technical support should also be improved. Currently, it is scalable, but only in a vertical way. They provide good technical support, but the initial steps for a new case can be improved to fasten the resolution process."

"The stability is not great and should be better."

"It's still missing some platforms. For example, if you look to applications itself, it is missing the interface."

"With APM, we noticed that the agent can cause a lot of issues for the application, making the agent very unreliable. Many issues are happening, and we've had to discuss it with support to try and get a fix. It affects application availability, and sometimes actions fail because of the agent, degrading the performance of the application."

"Technical support can be slow and needs improvement."

"The demo that was provided to us is not working very well. At times, there are errors."

"They should focus on potentially enhancing the dashboard to make it more contemporary and adding some customization options. Furthermore, there might be room for improvement in the pricing policy."

"The user interface was not good."

"The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As I previously indicated, I initiated the IBM and uncovered all its elements. Consequently, I'm not inclined towards a licensing approach."

"IBM APM is one of the cheaper products on the market, while everything necessary to get started is included in the license."

"The licensing fees can be paid every six months or on a yearly basis."

"I would rate the pricing a nine to ten. It is very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

11%

University

Financial Services Firm

35%

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Application Performance Management?

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Application Performance Management?

They should focus on potentially enhancing the dashboard to make it more contemporary and adding some customization options. Furthermore, there might be room for improvement in the pricing policy. ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Application Performance Management?

I monitor business applications for more than four end users.

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager?

IBM's main value lies in its integration with its own technologies, which can be seen as a benefit in environments where IBM products are extensively used.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager?

I would rate IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager a six out of ten. The monitoring tool we currently use is outdated and lacks essential features for monitoring customer experience. We face lim...

See all answers

Comparisons

Instana Dynamic APM vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 42% of the time

BMC Compuware Strobe vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 18% of the time

AppDynamics vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 11% of the time

Dynatrace vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM Application Performance Management Competitors

Dynatrace vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 39% of the time

Azure Monitor vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 22% of the time

IBM Instana Observability vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 15% of the time

More IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

November 2024

IBM Application Performance Management report

Download IBM Application Performance Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

November 2024

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager report

Download IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager product report

Also Known As

IBM APM

Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Learn More

IBM

Overview

The IBM Application Performance Management portfolio provides visibility, control and automation of your mission-critical applications. It helps pinpoint the root cause of application's issue more quickly and resolve the problem. The integrated capabilities cover the five key areas: discovery, end-use experience, transaction tracking, enterprise diagnostics and analytics. It also easily monitors applications to ensure optimal performance to extend your hybrid management environment capabilities, to measure the customer experience from multiple locations and to further eliminate blind spots in your application environment.

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for Application Diagnostics on z/OS manages real-time problem detection, analysis, and repair to help maintain the availability, performance and general health of on-demand composite applications. it can gain in-depth diagnostic information for specific application requests to identify the root cause of problems. This software provides a consistent way to manage composite applications throughout Java EE application environments. Set alerts to help detect and fix potentially troublesome situations before they affect users. It can resolve performance issues faster and reduce downtime costs.

Sample Customers

Mibtree, EatDrinkDeals.com, IT Performance Advisor

Michelin Tire Corp

Buyer's Guide

IBM Application Performance Management vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

October 2024

Free Report: IBM Application Performance Management vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Application Performance Management vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Application Performance Management vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.