Amazon CloudWatch and Cribl are competitors in the field of data monitoring and management. Cribl seems to have an edge with its real-time data transformation capabilities and cost-effectiveness.
Features: Amazon CloudWatch offers robust integration with AWS, providing real-time data and detailed metrics. It delivers efficient system-wide visibility for monitoring AWS infrastructure. Cribl enables powerful real-time data transformation within its pipeline, supporting enterprise product integration and efficient data management.
Room for Improvement: Amazon CloudWatch could improve in drill-down analytics, dashboard visualization, and mobile app monitoring. Users also desire enhanced documentation and API performance monitoring. Cribl could enhance logging and debugging capabilities, integration with certain enterprise solutions, and extend data view periods for better analytics.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon CloudWatch primarily supports public cloud deployment, while Cribl offers flexibility with on-premises and hybrid options. Amazon's technical support varies with paid tiers but can be cumbersome. Cribl’s customer support decisions suggest a need for improvements to accommodate different expertise levels.
Pricing and ROI: Amazon CloudWatch operates on a pay-as-you-go model that can become expensive as project scope increases, providing ROI through AWS integration. Cribl offers competitive pricing against alternatives like Splunk, offering notable cost savings and scalability advantages for large data management needs.
Amazon CloudWatch offers cost-saving advantages by being an inbuilt solution that requires no separate setup or maintenance for monitoring tasks.
In recent years, due to business expansion, knowledge levels among support engineers seem to vary.
The community, including the engineering and sales teams, is available on Slack and is very supportive.
Amazon CloudWatch's scalability is managed by AWS.
I sometimes notice slowness when Amazon CloudWatch agents are installed on machines with less capacity, causing me to use other monitoring tools.
Maybe Amazon Web Services can improve by providing a library for CloudWatch with some useful features.
Amazon CloudWatch charges extra for custom metrics, which is a significant disadvantage.
Perhaps more flexibility in terms of metrics would be helpful.
Amazon CloudWatch charges more for custom metrics as well as for changes in the timeline.
Being an inbuilt solution from AWS, it saves time on installation, setup, and maintenance.
I like its filtering capability and its ability to give the cyber engine insights.
The community on Slack is excellent for solving questions and getting ideas.
Amazon CloudWatch is used for monitoring, tracking logs, and organizing metrics across AWS services. It detects anomalies, sets dynamic alarms, and automates actions to optimize cloud utilization, troubleshoot, and ensure service availability.
Organizations leverage Amazon CloudWatch for collecting and analyzing logs, triggering alerts, and profiling application performance. It's also employed for monitoring bandwidth, virtual machines, Lambda functions, and Kubernetes clusters. Valuable features include seamless integration with AWS, real-time data and alerts, detailed metrics, and a user-friendly interface. It provides robust monitoring capabilities for infrastructure and application performance, log aggregation, and analytics. Users appreciate its scalability, ease of setup, and affordability. Additional key aspects are the ability to create alarms, dashboards, and automated responses, along with detailed insights into system and application health. Room for improvement includes dashboards and UI enhancements for better visualization and customizability, log streaming speed, advanced machine learning and reporting capabilities, pricing, and integration with non-AWS services and databases. Users also seek more real-time monitoring and comprehensive application performance features, and simpler alerts and configuration processes.
What are the most important features?
What benefits and ROI can users expect?
Amazon CloudWatch is implemented across a range of industries, including technology, finance, healthcare, and retail. Technology firms use it to monitor application performance and traffic, while financial organizations leverage it for ensuring compliance and system reliability. Healthcare entities rely on it for maintaining service availability and monitoring data flow, and retail companies utilize it for tracking customer interactions and optimizing server usage.
Cribl optimizes log collection, data processing, and migration to Splunk Cloud, ensuring efficient data ingestion and management for improved operational efficiency.
Cribl offers seamless log collection directly from cloud sources, allowing users to visually extract necessary data and replay specific events for in-depth analysis. It provides robust management of events, parsing, and enrichment of data, along with effective log size reduction. Cribl is particularly beneficial for migrating enterprise logs, optimizing usage, and reducing costs while streamlining the transition between different log management tools.
What are Cribl's most important features?
What benefits and ROI should users look for?
Cribl is widely implemented in industries requiring extensive data management, such as technology and finance. Users leverage Cribl to handle log collection, processing, and migration efficiently, ensuring smooth operation and effective data analysis. It aids in managing temporary data storage during downtimes and better handling historical data, preventing data loss and allowing extended periods for viewing statistics and monitoring trends.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.