Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon CloudWatch vs Solarwinds Papertrail comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.8
Amazon CloudWatch offers real-time monitoring, alerts, analytics, and customizable dashboards, integrated seamlessly with AWS for enhanced security and functionality.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
7.0
Amazon CloudWatch users are dissatisfied with pricing, UI complexity, inadequate log functionalities, and seek better integration, reporting, and monitoring features.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Amazon CloudWatch is highly stable and reliable, with minor UI lags on large data, rarely affecting overall performance.
No sentiment score available
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Amazon CloudWatch is highly rated for its scalability, handling high volumes and diverse organizational needs consistently across multiple accounts.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.6
Amazon CloudWatch customer service is praised for expertise and availability, though navigating support can be tedious; premium support offers faster resolution.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Amazon CloudWatch pricing varies widely, from as low as $25 to over $300 monthly, depending on usage and integration.
No sentiment score available
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon CloudWatch
Ranking in Log Management
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (13th), Cloud Monitoring Software (9th)
Solarwinds Papertrail
Ranking in Log Management
55th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Rasanpreet Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable AWS monitoring and logging
The choice of logging solution should always be determined by the specific business requirements. It is crucial to align the logging strategy with what type of logs are needed and how they should be used. There are instances where we require custom solutions to retrieve logs, especially application logs that may not be easily accessible through CloudWatch or similar services. When we heavily rely on AWS native services, CloudWatch is indeed a robust choice. However, in certain scenarios, we might need integration capabilities with other tools, and if they can incorporate such features, it would enhance overall logging capabilities. I would rate it eight out of ten.
Use Solarwinds Papertrail?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
8%
University
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon CloudWatch?
In general, Amazon CloudWatch is cheaper compared to Dynatrace. However, there are potential costs to be mindful of, like running a log query that returns trillions of bytes of data.
What needs improvement with Amazon CloudWatch?
There is room for improvement in setting up custom metrics in CloudWatch. Adding conditional expressions would enhance its functionality.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
Papertrail
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AirAsia, Airbnb, Aircel, APUS, Avazu, Casa & Video, Futbol Club Barcelona (FCBarcelona), National Taiwan University, redBus
Product Hunt
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.