Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon WorkMail vs Mailgun comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon WorkMail
Ranking in Cloud Email
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Email Applications (4th)
Mailgun
Ranking in Cloud Email
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Michael Olayemi - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides free messages and helps to keep customers updated
The solution is quite low-level and lacks some advanced features. For example, it doesn't provide tracking capabilities, such as knowing how many users opened an email, which is crucial for email marketing. You would need to integrate these analytics with other tools to get them. I need to know if there has been a bounce and how customers interacted with the email. I would only suggest that Amazon WorkMail relax the rules for using Amazon SES in production. When you create an account, it starts in Sandbox mode, which means you can't use it in production right away. You must go through a process, message Amazon, and request to move it to production. Since Amazon is a big company, I feel customers shouldn't need this permission to use the service in production.
Christopher Justice - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable, easy to set up, and offers good email-sending capabilities
We use the solution for high-volume email sending for event management. Simple and perfect for what we need.  It has helped us with email deliverability. The email-sending capabilities are great. It's a very easy product to set up.  The solution is stable. It is scalable.  The solution needs…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the Amazon WorkMail for me is the SMC server. It makes my work much easier, especially since I often work with Spring Boot. There are many built-in APIs in Spring Boot that help with messaging. What I appreciate about it is that it simplifies the process. I don't need to write much code; I define the credentials in my properties or environment variables. The Java Message API, an internal API from Spring Boot, does most of the work. I set up the properties and connected them to the SMC server, and I can send emails."
"We use the tool for transactional emails and marketing."
"Amazon WorkMail integrates with Route 53 and other AWS services, providing a seamless experience when using AWS infrastructure."
"The most valuable thing is that emails sent through SES have a delivery rate of greater than ninety percent."
"It is very stable. I haven't faced any issues."
"Amazon SES can handle a high volume of emails, making it suitable for organizations with large email lists or that need to send a large number of emails on a regular basis."
"The best feature is that Amazon SES provides verified email messages."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"It's a very easy product to set up."
 

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the scalability."
"When we first set up an email on Amazon SES, they had to verify it, which was not fast enough."
"It would be ideal to have detailed data and reporting on email opens, clicks, bounces, and other metrics, as well as integration with other business intelligence tools."
"The solution is quite low-level and lacks some advanced features. For example, it doesn't provide tracking capabilities, such as knowing how many users opened an email, which is crucial for email marketing. You would need to integrate these analytics with other tools to get them. I need to know if there has been a bounce and how customers interacted with the email."
"Amazon WorkMail's user interface could be more intuitive and user-friendly."
"WorkMail is not available in all the regions."
"There is room for improvement in the support. It's just that customer support, though good, takes time to resolve issues."
"I would like to see detailed reports on email success and failure rates."
"The solution needs better templating and email validation."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"WorkMail does require a license, it is, per user."
"It's very cheap. The cheapest among all the services available."
"I rate the solution's pricing as one out of ten. It is close to being cheap. Sometimes, the tool offers a generous amount of free messages, up to 40,000, which is great for startups like ours. This means that we don't accumulate any costs for some months because we stay within the free usage tier. When we exceed the free allocation, the costs are reasonable, and no hidden charges exist."
"The solution should improve its price."
"We pay $80 a month to use the solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Email solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon WorkMail?
We use the tool for transactional emails and marketing.
What needs improvement with Amazon WorkMail?
Amazon WorkMail's user interface could be more intuitive and user-friendly. Integration with Gmail using both SMTP and POP3 would be beneficial.
What advice do you have for others considering Amazon WorkMail?
Currently, I don't have any advice about using Amazon WorkMail. Since I only use AWS and am unfamiliar with its competitors, I can't recommend it.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Amazon SES
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Stripe. GitHub, Heroku
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon WorkMail vs. Mailgun and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.