Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Anaconda vs KNIME comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.9
KNIME offers substantial ROI with ease of use, low costs, and supports efficient project development and concept testing.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.6
Anaconda users often solve issues via documentation and community support, with responsive technical support when needed.
Sentiment score
6.6
KNIME offers satisfactory service with strong community support, though documentation and language options could improve to assist users globally.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
Anaconda is scalable and effective for data science, though larger deployments may present challenges for some users.
Sentiment score
7.0
KNIME is scalable, efficiently handles large datasets, integrates well with technologies, but faces RAM limitations on desktops.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Anaconda is favored for stability and reliability, despite occasional memory delays and deployment issues noted by some users.
Sentiment score
7.6
KNIME is generally stable and reliable, with occasional memory issues and crashes that can improve with updates and configurations.
 

Room For Improvement

Anaconda requires improved multi-language support, stability, user interface, and documentation to enhance usability and adoption in the community.
KNIME users seek improvements in data visualization, resource efficiency, integrations, documentation, UI, automation, and community support.
For graphics, the interface is a little confusing.
 

Setup Cost

Anaconda offers a free open-source version with key features, but GPU-intensive tasks may require extra hardware costs.
KNIME provides a cost-effective analytics platform with a free desktop version and a paid server version for enterprises.
 

Valuable Features

Anaconda provides a comprehensive platform for data science with extensive libraries, virtual environments, and intuitive visualization tools.
KNIME offers user-friendly data integration and processing with extensive language support, algorithms, and open-source features for enhanced analytics.
KNIME is more intuitive and easier to use, which is the principal advantage.
 

Categories and Ranking

Anaconda
Ranking in Data Science Platforms
12th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
KNIME
Ranking in Data Science Platforms
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
59
Ranking in other categories
Data Mining (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Data Science Platforms category, the mindshare of Anaconda is 2.1%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of KNIME is 11.3%, up from 9.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Science Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Rohan Sharma - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides all the frameworks and makes it easy to create environments for multiple projects
The best thing is that it provides all the frameworks and makes it easy to create environments for multiple projects using Anaconda. It is easy for a beginner to learn to use Anaconda. Comparatively, it is easier than using virtual environments or other environments because of the Conda environment. However, there are many things in Anaconda that people need to be aware of, so it can be challenging.
Hansong Choi - PeerSpot reviewer
A low-code platform that reduces data mining time by linking script
The solution allows for sharing model designs and model operations with other data analysts. Other solutions such as SAS, R, and Python consist of just the script which is difficult to share. The solution is a low-code platform which reduces data mining time and its platform includes a clickable icon for linking script.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Science Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
825,399 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
10%
University
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
9%
Educational Organization
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Anaconda?
The tool's most valuable feature is its cloud-based nature, allowing accessibility from anywhere. Additionally, using Jupyter Notebook makes it easy to handle bugs and errors.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Anaconda?
Anaconda does not require a pricing structure, and it is available as an open-source tool. The features of Python, Jupyter, and others are free to use.
What needs improvement with Anaconda?
Anaconda consumes a significant amount of processing memory when working on it. This is something that needs improvement as it can impact performance.
What do you like most about KNIME?
Since KNIME is a no-code platform, it is easy to work with.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KNIME?
I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
What needs improvement with KNIME?
The current UI is primarily in English. Analyzing data in local languages might present challenges or issues.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
KNIME Analytics Platform
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

LinkedIn, NASA, Boeing, JP Morgan, Recursion Pharmaceuticals, DARPA, Microsoft, Amazon, HP, Cisco, Thomson Reuters, IBM, Bridgestone
Infocom Corporation, Dymatrix Consulting Group, Soluzione Informatiche, MMI Agency, Estanislao Training and Solutions, Vialis AG
Find out what your peers are saying about Anaconda vs. KNIME and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
825,399 professionals have used our research since 2012.