Apica vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM comparison

Apica and Logsign are both solutions in the Log Management category. Apica is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.7, while Logsign is ranked #43 with an average rating of 7.7. Apica holds a 0.2% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Logsign’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Apica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Logsign users who would recommend it.

Apica

Read 11 Apica reviews

1,035 Views
424 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Read 4 Logsign Next-Gen SIEM reviews

816 Views
604 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apica

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM and Apica are key players in IT infrastructure monitoring solutions. User feedback suggests Apica holds the upper hand due to its comprehensive features.

Features: Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is known for effective threat detection, intuitive dashboard design, and cost efficiency. Apica stands out with detailed performance monitoring capabilities, extensive integrations, and feature-rich solutions favored by users.

Room for Improvement: Logsign needs better integration options, more sophisticated analytics, and improved reporting tools. Apica could enhance its reporting tools, reduce alert noise, and refine its alert system.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Logsign offers straightforward deployment and reliable customer service. Apica provides a robust support system but has a more complex initial deployment process. Logsign is often easier for quick onboarding, while Apica requires more setup time.

Pricing and ROI: Logsign is seen as cost-effective with a favorable ROI, appealing to those with budget constraints. Apica, while more expensive, is perceived to deliver significant long-term value, attractive to businesses prioritizing feature depth and return on investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Apica vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apica

Ranking in Log Management

18th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (17th), IT Operations Analytics (5th), Observability Pipeline Software (2nd)

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Ranking in Log Management

43rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (45th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Apica is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Punith H K

Senior Systems Engineer at Infosys

Enables users to create scripts easily and provides excellent real-time monitoring features

It is easy to create scripts. We don't have to write any script. Ready-made options are available. We can select, drag, and drop the options, and the script is ready. The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery. If we have an application and the script for it, we keep monitoring it. When the script goes red, it indicates that something is not working. So, we check and analyze the applications. We keep track of applications and monitor whether they are live or not. The tool is also useful for monitoring cloud services.

Read full review

Ayaz Ahmed

Cyber Security Specialist at lums

Works well for threat detection and security

Improvements needed in Logsign SIEM are providing specific security alerts that can be filtered and configured more effectively. There should be a focus on delivering alerts tailored to specific needs rather than overwhelming users with numerous alerts. Additionally, incorporating more mature data about threats is necessary for better threat detection.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like the most is that Apica can simulate different browsers and different versions of desktop or mobile browsers."

"We see the benefit almost every day. It allows us to be alerted whenever there is a store that is not responding properly around the world. We do have a network operation center (NOC) who receives these alerts, immediately checking if everything is okay."

"It helps with releases because we monitor them in staging. We can tell if something is critically wrong before it gets into production, e.g., if it was load related or function related and also what was different in the dev stage. It then alerts us straightaway inside of our production monitors once it has been released. Therefore, it has improved how we run our systems since we monitor multiple environments."

"It is easy for beginners to learn and use Apica."

"Apica allows me to record APIs easily and enhances scripts through options like auto-correlation, enabling me to access dynamic fields."

"It is easy to set up and configure."

"APICa allows me to record APIs easily and enhances scripts through options like auto-correlation, enabling me to access dynamic fields."

"The solution captures all our requests and responses."

More Apica pros

"Logsign provides sample logs within the product, allowing users to see how logs will appear before integration, which is a valuable feature for testing and understanding log formats."

"It has full automation and automated SIEM responses."

"The most valuable features of Logsign SIEM are its cloud capabilities, alerting functionality, integration with Elastic Search, and configuration options."

Cons

"Apica should add more features and integrations with different tools and certain ticketing systems, like ServiceNow."

"We have been focused on reducing polling times for synthetic checks. We have gone from 10 minutes down to five minutes for a pretty broad swath, but there is some appetite to reduce that further, which could be an improvement."

"Apica was a relatively new tool when I started using it. Although Apica had good documentation, it still felt less developed or advanced than a tool like LoadRunner."

"The reporting part that we use for our executives needs a bit more customization capabilities. Right now, you can use only the three main templates for reporting. We would like to be able to customize them."

"The tool does not provide automatic correlation features."

"The having to install an application on your desktop to utilize something like ZebraTester is a little cumbersome. It would be nice to see that become a web-based application. Having the documentation a little more accessible, and easier to digest by people who are just learning how to use the framework, especially when it comes to more complex or more edge-based cases would be really helpful to have."

"It is difficult to create a script using ZebraTester."

"The initial screen on their dashboard could have a bit more data, but this is a small thing. It could have more data, so we do not need to drill down to a screen behind that initial information. I would like them to get a little better on the user interfaces that we need to go into."

More Apica cons

"AI and machine learning need to be developed. If they develop those features, I think everything will be fine."

"I hope they address the pricing model for Logsign Next-Gen SIEM, especially regarding regional variations. The pricing should not differ based on the country of operation as it can lead to dissatisfaction among customers. A fixed pricing structure would be more favorable for us. I would also suggest enhancing the GUI interface and adding features similar to xFi Exchange from IBM Pure. This would streamline operations and save time for analysts."

"Improvements needed in Logsign SIEM are providing specific security alerts that can be filtered and configured more effectively."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides."

"Apica is pretty cost-effective if you buy both solutions together: Synthetic and LoadTest. If you are going for one solution, the cost is on par with any tool in the market."

"I am sure that Apica's price will be lower than LoadRunner."

"The solution's pricing is not cheap, but it is in the midrange."

"License management is another area that Apica could do better. We have already had these conversations with our account teams. This is something that they are looking at largely improving in upcoming releases. I believe that this is already on their roadmap."

"The product is less expensive compared to LoadRunner."

"The tool is completely free and open source. I've been using it for about two and a half years and installed it on both my personal and client machines without needing a license. All features are available for use without any hidden fees."

"Another main difference between Apica and the other products was the cost. We really thought that the balance in Apica between the features and costs was the best among all the products on which we did a PoC."

More Apica pricing and cost advice

"Compared to other SIEMs, it has low pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Media Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apica Synthetic?

The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apica Synthetic?

I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apica Synthetic?

Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently. It requires other tools like ALM. When editing scripts, only one can be accessed at a time, risking changes affecting other folders. ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Logsign Next-Gen SIEM?

It does not have much AI and machine learning features yet. They are developing them and will be releasing them in a few months.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Logsign Next-Gen SIEM?

We use Logsign SIEM for various tasks in our daily operations. One key use case is for forensic analysis. We also use it to monitor critical servers and generate security alerts for actions like lo...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Logsign Next-Gen SIEM?

Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten. AI and machine learning need to be developed. If they develop those features, I think everything will be fine. I can recommend it. Not for large enterp...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Apica

Compared 26% of the time

Cribl vs Apica

Compared 22% of the time

Datadog vs Apica

Compared 15% of the time

AlertSite vs Apica

Compared 14% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Apica

Compared 13% of the time

More Apica Competitors

Grafana Loki vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 37% of the time

Falcon LogScale vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 24% of the time

Wazuh vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 17% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 11% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Compared 11% of the time

More Logsign Next-Gen SIEM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apica

July 2025

Download Apica product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

June 2025

Download Logsign Next-Gen SIEM product report

Also Known As

Apica LoadTest, Apica Synthetic

No data available

Overview

Apica offers a unified platform to remove complexity and cost associated with data management. You collect, control, store, and observe your data and can quickly identify and resolve performance issues before they impact the end-user. Apica Ascent swiftly analyzes telemetry data in real-time, enabling prompt issue resolution, while automated root cause analysis, powered by machine learning, streamlines troubleshooting in complex distributed systems. The platform simplifies data collection by automating and managing agents through the platform’s Fleet product. Its Flow product simplifies and optimizes pipeline control with AI and ML to help you easily understand complex workflows. Its Store component allows you to never run out of storage space while you index and store machine data centrally on one platform and reduce costs, and remediate faster. Observe offers modern observability data management, helping you with MELT data, effortless dashboarding, and seamless integration of synthetic and real data.

Experience the Apica Ascent Platform

Apica

Logsign delivers automation-driven cyber security solutions and are committed to providing the smartest, easiest-to-use and most affordable cybersecurity detection and response solutions and value-added services. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM is an enterprise-grade SIEM, inline with our promise, it's easy-to-deploy, easy-to-use and affordable unlike the other enterprise-grade SIEM softwares.

Easy-to-deploy, easy-to-use and affordable SIEM for all.
Unlimited scalability, high availability - cluster SIEM, big data infrastructure.
Deploy on every environment, on-premise solution.
400+ predefined integrations and free plugin service.
Collects & stores unlimited data.
Threat hunting, fast search & investigation, advanced behavior analysis, IOC detection.
Real-time detection & prevention, wide correlation library based on Mitre Att&ck framework.
Real-time monitoring, predefined dashboards & reports, meeting compliance requirements (PCI DSS, ISO 27001, HIPAA, SOX and more).
Automated notifications, automated actions.
Flexible pricing options, and more information and for more automated response features, please look for our SOAR platform.

Logsign

Sample Customers

HBO, JPMC, Morgan Stanley, Xander, EA Sports, Volvo

Turkish Petroleum, Tırsan, DP World, SAC American Colleges, Robert College, Unlu&Co, UniCo Insurance Company, ETSTur, CK Energy, UEDAS Energy, Wilo, Eurocross Assistance, Deloitte Turkey, Incı GS Yuasa, Pappara, Bilgi University, Anadolu University, İstanbul University, The Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, TRT, Anadolu Media Agency, Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Services, Ispark, Spor AS and wide range of enterprises in different industries.

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

July 2025

Free Report: Apica vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM

Find out what your peers are saying about Apica vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apica vs. Logsign Next-Gen SIEM report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.