New Relic and Apica compete in the monitoring and observability category. New Relic has the upper hand due to its ease of use, customer support, and better overall value considering pricing and ROI.
Features: New Relic offers robust monitoring capabilities, integrations with various services, and a user-friendly approach. Apica provides detailed synthetic monitoring, real-user monitoring, and extensive insights suitable for complex needs.
Room for Improvement: New Relic needs enhancements in dashboard customization, better alerting functionalities, and improved reporting automation. Apica requires improvements in reporting features, a more intuitive setup process, and streamlined configuration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: New Relic has a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Apica's deployment is challenging but benefits from comprehensive support post-setup. Users find New Relic's onboarding simpler and acknowledge Apica’s support quality after deployment.
Pricing and ROI: New Relic offers competitive pricing with high ROI due to its efficiency in problem-solving. Apica has higher pricing, but users find it justified by the advanced features provided.
There is return on investment because since we reduced the downtime, we can definitely save a lot of money within that period.
There is a definite return on investment for New Relic, as we would not have invested in building its infrastructure if there were no returns.
After implementing New Relic, we have decreased staffing requirements while saving time and money.
If I drop an email to them, they will respond quickly to my email.
Customer support from New Relic is very good, and we rarely need to create support tickets.
They are very polite and helped him out.
APICa is scalable.
We currently use New Relic for tens of thousands of developers and hundreds of teams within our organization, and we have not encountered any scalability issues.
It is also suitable for cloud native architectures, SaaS, or software as a service, and for high volume data ingestion also.
Regarding New Relic's scalability, it excels at the enterprise level for cloud integrations that can utilize tags.
New Relic lags sometimes.
New Relic is stable based on my experience, as I have not seen any problems with the UI.
When editing scripts, only one can be accessed at a time, risking changes affecting other folders.
If they could improve the customer support by reducing their SLA within three to five days, if they could remediate everything, that will be so much helpful.
Using real-time data, if there are any malicious patterns or something happening, they can identify those.
Because of the pricing model, organizations have experienced uncontrolled costs and were not able to afford New Relic.
Considering the features New Relic offers, the pricing or cost setup has not been a blocker for our budget.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for synthetic monitoring is that minions used to cost a lot.
As we talk about pricing, it is not that much cheaper.
It is useful for both performance and automation testing, facilitating access to headers and payloads easily, enhancing scripts with dynamic values.
Using New Relic speeds up troubleshooting and resolution, giving us a clearer picture of where issues are, thus saving time and effort.
New Relic is very useful for teams that don't have much of a dedicated DevOps team but want to have observability for their platform, and it's an easy way to get started.
New Relic has positively impacted our organization by reducing errors, improving performance, and saving time.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| New Relic | 3.8% |
| Apica | 0.7% |
| Other | 95.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 65 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 52 |
| Large Enterprise | 79 |
Apica leads in observability cost optimization, empowering IT teams to control telemetry data economics. Apica Ascent spans metrics, logs, traces, and events, reducing observability costs by 40% compared to traditional solutions.
Apica provides unrivaled flexibility, supporting any data lake with both on-premises and cloud deployment options, eliminating costly tool sprawl through modular solutions. Ascent efficiently handles high-cardinality data and boasts patented InstaStore optimized storage technology and advanced root cause analysis capabilities. Many organizations choose Apica to drive down observability expenses.
What are Apica's key features?Apica is employed across industries for monitoring and synthetic user emulation, providing external visibility into user experiences with applications. It supports infrastructure checks, proactive error detection, synthetic logins, load testing, and performance monitoring. Organizations leverage its capabilities for error checks, geo-protection, and content validation, ensuring IT service and web operation availability and performance globally.
New Relic offers real-time application monitoring and insight into performance bottlenecks. Its customizable dashboards and APM integration provide efficient operational support, while server performance alerts ensure quick issue detection.
New Relic provides comprehensive monitoring of application performance, tracking bottlenecks across databases and front-end components. Users employ it for server and infrastructure monitoring, as well as analyzing key metrics such as CPU and memory usage. The solution's ability to integrate with tools like PagerDuty enhances incident management capabilities. However, users have expressed a need for improvements in query language simplicity, more detailed historical insights, and better mobile app monitoring support.
What are New Relic's most important features?In industries like e-commerce and financial services, New Relic supports application performance monitoring to enhance user experience and system reliability. Organizations leverage its insights for optimizing performance, particularly in server operations and infrastructure management. Its ability to monitor API failures through synthetic monitoring is crucial for maintaining high service levels.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
