Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AppDome vs DexGuard comparison

 

Categories and Ranking

AppDome
Ranking in Mobile Application Management
2nd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
DexGuard
Ranking in Mobile Application Management
1st
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Mobile Application Management category, the mindshare of AppDome is 43.9%, up from 37.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of DexGuard is 43.9%, up from 37.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile Application Management
 

Featured Reviews

Use AppDome?
Share your opinion
AnirbanSarkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Has code hardening and obfuscation features, and adds a security layer; user-friendly and easy to integrate
What needs improvement in DexGuard is its maturity level in terms of Flutter support. DexGuard doesn't cover every aspect of SDK protection, particularly for Flutter-based applications. The product just started supporting Flutter-based applications, so it's not yet on a mature level. Flutter is a platform widely used for mobile application development, and DexGuard still needs many improvements in supporting Flutter for obfuscation purposes. Compared to other products, onboarding DexGuard can be more challenging because it lacks evaluation. The DexGuard team gives a very technical demonstration. Still, there's no evaluation for this product, which means people have to judge it based on the demonstration only, which can be challenging. If you compare DexGuard with Alluvial or New Relic APM based on technical aspects, there's no problem with DexGuard because it's pretty stable. I've not heard anyone saying that it's a low-end product or that it doesn't meet requirements. However, other products can sometimes be a bit more economical when compared with DexGuard because the DexGuard team still has some low-hanging scenarios that need to be taken care of. As DexGuard is a sophisticated product, for example, it can give thirteen layers of obfuscation and a very high level of code hardening. It can catch particular issues and run time through ThreatCast. Hence, it has features that other products don't have, so you might have to pay a small premium based on specific scenarios, which makes other products more economical than DexGuard. This could be another area for improvement. An additional feature I'd like to see in DexGuard is a GUI. There should be two options in the product, the command line option and a GUI option. Some people prefer using the command line option, and some people would love the GUI option, so having both options in DexGuard would make the product better.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile Application Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
11%
University
5%
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview