Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Arcserve UDP vs Vision Solutions Double-Take comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 15, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Arcserve UDP
Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
9th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
43
Ranking in other categories
Backup and Recovery (18th)
Vision Solutions Double-Take
Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
28th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Data Replication (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of Arcserve UDP is 1.7%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Vision Solutions Double-Take is 0.8%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
 

Q&A Highlights

it_user186732 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 17, 2016
 

Featured Reviews

MukundKambli - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 8, 2022
Global deduplication, stable, and flexible licensing options
I give the solution ten out of ten. This solution offers one dashboard to manage the BC con, disaster recovery plan, DR solution, and backup as well as different licensing options, unlike other OEM products. We are the system integrators for our clients, so we design the solution as per the customer's requirements. We provide several solutions options to our clients such as Druva inSync, Druva Phoenix, and Arcserve UDP with the specifications and the client makes a decision based on their requirements. I would advise potential users to first be clear on whether they are going to use it as a backup solution for compliance purposes, just wanting to take the backups of files and servers, or for instant recovery. The IQ and RPO discussion with our customers usually takes 30 minutes. I recommend this solution.
it_user157563 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 21, 2014
​Has improved our organization: it takes less time to replicate files between 2 servers.
File replication It takes less time to replicate files between 2 servers. 1 year. No issue so far. No issue so far. Not in the pipeline to upgrade. Customer Service: Good. Technical Support: Good. Yes, straightforward. In-house. Reduce man hour to manage file server. Original setup cost-…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is very expensive."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a four or five out of ten."
"There is an annual license required for this solution and it is priced well."
"Its price seems reasonable. Its price is average as compared to the other products I've looked at. We have a three-year license right now. There are no other costs beyond the standard licensing fee."
"The solution is priced well compared to other solutions."
"It is approximately $400 to purchase a virtual service outright."
"We only have the maintenance of three standard UDP licenses. Each license is 50 Euro. There are some additional costs for the storage and software but it has nothing to do with the UDP."
"There are annual subscription fees and there are licensing costs for three computers. It is an expensive solution."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

it_user186732 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 18, 2016
Aug 18, 2016
You've correctly identified that Arcserve UDP Premium Plus (f.k.a. RHA) is a direct competitor to Double-Take in the area of asynchronous replication. Bottom line is both solutions are good. Double-Take has the advantage in its support for HP-UX. We feel that Arcserve UDP has the easier process when it comes to "fail-back" to the new Production environment. When you do your POC, be sure to ...
2 out of 13 answers
it_user187770 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 16, 2016
Ariel, Thank you for your inquiry, Dan Mack will get the appropriate Vision resource in contact with you. Thanks
it_user187770 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 16, 2016
Lars, Please assist. On Aug 16, 2016, at 6:17 AM, Bob Johnson > wrote: Ariel, Thank you for your inquiry, Dan Mack will get the appropriate Vision resource in contact with you. Thanks
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Government
8%
Non Profit
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
20%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Major Differences Between These 4 Backup and Disaster Recovery Solutions?
Comparing the features of the four is not the right approach. You need to develop a list of requirements for backup and DR that are specific to your organization and then compare each of the four ...
What do you like most about Arcserve UDP?
The most valuable feature of Arcserve UDP is the initiative UI and the logs are clear and detailed that are generated when there has been an issue or failure on the user's system. We only have to l...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arcserve UDP?
The licensing cost is for one year. There are not any hidden costs involved in the pricing model of the solution.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

StorageCraft ShadowProtect, StorageCraft Backup Analyzer
Double-Take, DoubleTake
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ITPS, North Hertfordshire Homes, SEMIKRON, Kajaani University of Applied Sciences, Test Valley Borough Council, EK Services
ABC Fine Wine & Spirits, Accessor Capital Management, Adventist Health, Alfa Bank, Alphawest Services, Ameristar Casinos, Ambrian Capital PLC
Find out what your peers are saying about Arcserve UDP vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.