Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ArcSight Logger vs Elastic Security comparison

OpenText and Elastic are both solutions in the Log Management category. OpenText is ranked #31 with an average rating of 6.7, while Elastic is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.7. OpenText holds a 0.8% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Elastic’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Elastic users who would recommend it.
ArcSight Logger
Read 31 ArcSight Logger reviews
  • 1,469 Views
  • 1,332 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
Elastic Security
Read 64 Elastic Security reviews
  • 8,249 Views
  • 7,021 Comparison Views
86% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ArcSight Logger and Elastic Security are both formidable in the security information and event management category. Elastic Security seems to have the upper hand due to its scalability, threat detection capabilities, and advanced threat hunting as highlighted by user reviews.

Features: ArcSight Logger users benefit from comprehensive event log management, efficient data auditing, and detailed log analysis. Elastic Security is valued for its scalable threat detection features, superior visualization tools, and ease of integration with other data sources.

Room for Improvement: ArcSight Logger faces integration complexities, a steep learning curve, and user challenges in mastering technical aspects. Elastic Security requires better documentation, seeks more seamless support options, and clearer configuration clarity as highlighted by users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ArcSight Logger has a straightforward deployment requiring technical expertise and is recognized for responsive customer service. Elastic Security offers flexible deployment models but involves complex configurations and has a need for improved support channels.

Pricing and ROI: ArcSight Logger involves a high initial setup cost but offers fair ROI with its log management capabilities. Elastic Security, while also necessitating a significant upfront investment, is perceived to deliver better ROI due to integrated security features and adaptability to dynamic threats.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ArcSight Logger vs. Elastic Security Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Logger vs. Elastic Security
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 845,564 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ArcSight Logger
Ranking in Log Management
31st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Elastic Security
Ranking in Log Management
7th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
64
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (5th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (16th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (6th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of ArcSight Logger is 0.8%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Elastic Security is 3.5%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Log Management
 

Featured Reviews

Geraldo Freitas - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhances our security incident investigation but not good for correlation
Investigation is good when you know what you want to search for in Logger. The most difficult part is parsing the logs and configuring the parsers. For investigation, it's good. For correlation, it's not good. We use Sentinel, and Sentinel has pre-built use cases that are much easier to configure. So, it enhances our security incident investigation. We have inbound integration, but configuring the parsers is sometimes very difficult. We only have two use cases where we have a correlation set up. We send the information to Check Point to block IP addresses when we see a lot of blocks from the same source. We have a trigger. So, Logger automatically blocks these IP addresses. We could have Logger put them on a blacklist. So, it offers the ease of integration.
Read full review
SyedAli17 - PeerSpot reviewer
Centralized monitoring improves security posture through rapid data processing
The processing part of Elastic Security ( /products/elastic-security-reviews ) is very interesting for us since we handle almost 7,000 to 8,000 alerts per minute. We require rapid processing speed for alerts and event data, and Elastic Security is very efficient at handling this level of data. Additionally, Elastic Security helps improve the security posture of Pakistan through centralized visibility and real-time processing.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the level of detail that you can see about certain events, even when they do not come up in the console."
"We haven't had any crashes or bugs. It is stable."
"I am impressed with the product's ability to pick up logs. It also has UEBA which has reduced the time to take charge of the events."
"It is one of the best products available in the market."
"It provides in-depth information on business activities once we log into the system."
"In terms of ArcSight Logger's most valuable feature, it is their scalability. ArcSight's real advantage is its scalability because they have two layers, including the logger layer."
"Our return on investment for implementing ArcSight Logger over the past 12 months has been positive."
"The ESM use cases are the most valuable. It enables us to use the big data collection inside our company. We are able to create use cases for whatever it suits and I find that the most interesting part of any SIEM solution."
More ArcSight Logger pros
"ELK Logstash is easy and fast, at least for the initial setup with the out of box uses."
"I like that it's a SIEM platform. I like that I can sell Elastic Security quickly. Elastic Security has a large community that can support users."
"I can look at events from more than one source across multiple different locations and find patterns or anomalies. The machine learning capabilities are helpful, and I can create rules for notifications to be more proactive rather than responding after something has gone wrong."
"The most valuable feature for me is Discover."
"Enables monitoring of application performance and the ability to predict behaviors."
"Elastic Security offers advanced features such as machine learning and integration with ChatGPT."
"Elastic is straightforward, easy to integrate, and highly customizable."
"What customers found most valuable in Elastic Security feature-wise is the search capability, in particular, the way of writing the search query and the speed of searching for results."
More Elastic Security pros
 

Cons

"I think the ArcSight team should try to simplify legacy products for the customers, because that product is not easy to use or to work with. It needs more more competency or appeal to use. We hope Micro Focus is trying to resolve this."
"The initial setup was a little bit complex."
"It would be better if the product is cheaper."
"The product's connectors should work better and the user manuals need an update."
"The solution should make it possible to integrate network analysis features."
"The next release should have AI capabilities."
"You have limited reporting capabilities and I wouldn't choose ArcSight Logger for this purpose."
"The console in older versions is not user-friendly."
More ArcSight Logger cons
"Authentication is not a default in Kibana. We need to have another tool to have authentication and authorization. These two should be part of Kibana."
"Elastic Security could improve the documentation. It would help if they were more simple and clean."
"There should be a simulation environment to check whether my Elastic implementation is functioning perfectly fine. Other solutions have their own Android and iOS applications that I can install on my mobile so that I am continuously connected to the SIEM."
"If the documentation were improved and made more clear for beginners, or even professionals, then we would be more attracted to this solution."
"The solution's basic setup takes time, and a lot of effort is required from the beginning to make it actually work."
"The solution could also use better dashboards. They need to be more graphical, more matrix-like."
"The problem with ELK is it's difficult to administer. When you have a problem, it can be very, very difficult to rebuild indexes."
"The initial configuration and setup are complicated and not straightforward."
More Elastic Security cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's not cheap at all as it's a big product and has been in the market for quite some time now."
"I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is inexpensive, and ten is expensive."
"I would rate the product a seven out of ten since it's an enterprise product."
"The pricing is quite harsh."
"ArcSight Logger is very expensive compared to their competitors, but when we talk to the customer and explain what the features are and how we can scale, they understand. Still, ArcSight is more expensive than the competition."
"We have a lifetime license, so we don't pay a monthly fee."
"ArcSight is an expensive solution."
"Pricing is reasonable compared to similar tools on the market. They offer perpetual licenses."
"It's a monthly cost with Elastic SIEM, but I am not sure of the exact cost."
"Compared to other products such as Dynatrace, this is one of the cheaper options."
"The tool's pricing is flexible and comes at unit cost. You don't have to pay for everything."
"The solution is not expensive and costs around ten dollars a month."
"I can say that the product is cheaply priced."
"The solution is free."
"The licensing cost of Elastic Security is based on the daily ingestion rate. I can't recall the exact figure, but for 10GB of log action daily, it would cost around $20,000."
"Affordable but with additional costs"
More Elastic Security pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
845,564 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
17%
Government
9%
Educational Organization
6%
Computer Software Company
17%
Government
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ArcSight Logger?
We have a trigger. So, Logger automatically blocks these IP addresses. We could have Logger put them on a blacklist.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Logger?
The pricing isn't the problem. We have a lifetime license, so we don't pay a monthly fee.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ArcSight Logger?
The solution has room for improvement. We're currently upgrading to the newer version, where they have something like Kafka, a hub for all solutions feeding information into Logger. However, I thin...
See all answers
Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?
With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...
See all answers
What do you like most about Elastic Security?
Elastic provides the capability to index quickly due to the reverse indexes it offers. This data is crucial as it contains critical information. The reverse index allows fast data indexing because ...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Security?
Elastic Security is considered cost-effective, especially at lower EPS levels. However, a direct comparison was not made due to different pricing structures.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ArcSight Logger Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs ArcSight Logger
Compared 38% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs ArcSight Logger Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs ArcSight Logger
Compared 35% of the time
Wazuh vs ArcSight Logger Logo
Wazuh vs ArcSight Logger
Compared 7% of the time
LogRhythm SIEM vs ArcSight Logger Logo
LogRhythm SIEM vs ArcSight Logger
Compared 4% of the time
Grafana Loki vs ArcSight Logger Logo
Grafana Loki vs ArcSight Logger
Compared 4% of the time
More ArcSight Logger Competitors
Wazuh vs Elastic Security Logo
Wazuh vs Elastic Security
Compared 23% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Elastic Security Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Elastic Security
Compared 9% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs Elastic Security Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs Elastic Security
Compared 7% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Elastic Security Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Elastic Security
Compared 6% of the time
Microsoft Sentinel vs Elastic Security Logo
Microsoft Sentinel vs Elastic Security
Compared 5% of the time
More Elastic Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Logger
April 2025
ArcSight Logger reportDownload ArcSight Logger product report
Buyer's Guide
Elastic Security
April 2025
Elastic Security reportDownload Elastic Security product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Arcsight Logger, HPE Arcsight Logger
Elastic SIEM, ELK Logstash
 

Overview

HPE ArcSight Data Platform (ADP) offers a future-ready data solution that enriches data in real time and supports open standards for better threat detection. Using security data connectors, ADP collects data and enriches it in real-time to give analysts organized information that can be acted upon instantly.
OpenText
Elastic Security is a robust, open-source security solution designed to offer integrated threat prevention, detection, and response capabilities across an organization's entire digital estate. Part of the Elastic Stack (which includes Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana), Elastic Security leverages the power of search, analytics, and data aggregation to provide real-time insight into threats and vulnerabilities. It is a comprehensive platform that supports a wide range of security needs, from endpoint protection to cloud and network security, making it a versatile choice for organizations looking to enhance their cybersecurity posture.


Elastic Security combines the features of a security information and event management (SIEM) system with endpoint protection, allowing organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats in real time. This unified approach helps reduce complexity and improve the efficiency of security operations.

Additional offerings and benefits:

  • The platform utilizes advanced analytics, machine learning algorithms, and anomaly detection to identify threats and suspicious activities.
  • It offers extensive integration options with other tools and platforms, facilitating a more cohesive and comprehensive security ecosystem.
  • With Kibana, users gain access to powerful visualization tools and dashboards that provide real-time insight into security data.

Finally, Elastic Security benefits from a global community of users who contribute to its threat intelligence, helping to enhance its detection capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the solution remains on the cutting edge of cybersecurity, with up-to-date information on the latest threats and vulnerabilities.

Elastic
 

Sample Customers

China Merchants Bank, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa
Texas A&M, U.S. Air Force, NuScale Power, Martin's Point Health Care
Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Logger vs. Elastic Security
March 2025
Free Report: ArcSight Logger vs. Elastic Security
Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Logger vs. Elastic Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
845,564 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ArcSight Logger vs. Elastic Security report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.