ArcSight Logger vs Grafana Loki comparison

ArcSight Logger and Grafana Loki are key competitors in the log management solutions category. Users suggest Grafana Loki holds an advantage due to its superior query performance and scalability, while ArcSight Logger is recognized for its data retention capabilities.

Features: ArcSight Logger is recognized for extensive data retention, supporting high-speed search performance, favored for its intuitive management options. Grafana Loki stands out with integrated dashboarding, diverse data source support, and extensive customization options.

Room for Improvement: ArcSight Logger users note the need for adaptation to new log types, enhanced analytics features, and improved dynamic log handling. Grafana Loki users express a desire for better metric collection, streamlined configuration processes, and enhanced handling of dynamic logs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ArcSight Logger is noted for straightforward deployment and consistent support, aligning with enterprise needs. Grafana Loki is suited for rapid cloud deployments but can encounter setup complexity. Customer service receives positive feedback for both, with ArcSight Logger more consistently praised.

Pricing and ROI: ArcSight Logger presents higher initial costs but a strong ROI in large-scale environments. Grafana Loki is more cost-effective initially, offering good ROI in agile, cloud-centric scenarios. Users find Grafana Loki's price-performance ratio beneficial for evolving IT landscapes.